BIOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) WILT CAUSED BY Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris

A.J. DESHMUKH1*, V.P. PRAJAPATI2, P. SINGH3, R.P. BAMBHAROLIA4, H.E. PATIL5, B.K. PATEL6
1Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Waghai, 394730, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
2Department of Plant Pathology, ASPEE College of Horticulture, Vejalpore, 396450, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
3Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Waghai, 394730, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
4Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Waghai, 394730, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
5Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Hill Millet Research Station, Waghai, 394730, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
6Department of Agronomy, Pulse Research Station, Navsari, 396450, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
* Corresponding Author : amol_deshmukhnau@nau.in

Received : 16-09-2023     Accepted : 28-10-2023     Published : 30-10-2023
Volume : 15     Issue : 10       Pages : 12721 - 12724
Int J Agr Sci 15.10 (2023):12721-12724

Keywords : Chickpea, Wilt, Biological management
Academic Editor : Dr Vijaya Lakshmi V, Waseem Akram Khan
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Waghai, 394730; Hill Millet Research Station, Waghai, 394730 and Director of Research, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : DESHMUKH, A.J., et al "BIOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) WILT CAUSED BY Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15.10 (2023):12721-12724.

Cite - APA : DESHMUKH, A.J., PRAJAPATI, V.P., SINGH, P., BAMBHAROLIA, R.P., PATIL, H.E., PATEL, B.K. (2023). BIOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) WILT CAUSED BY Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris . International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 15 (10), 12721-12724.

Cite - Chicago : DESHMUKH, A.J., V.P. PRAJAPATI, P. SINGH, R.P. BAMBHAROLIA, H.E. PATIL, and B.K. PATEL. "BIOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) WILT CAUSED BY Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15, no. 10 (2023):12721-12724.

Copyright : © 2023, A.J. DESHMUKH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is grown on an average area of about 16401 ha in the Dangs district of South Gujarat per year. Severe incidence (10 to 40%) of wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris is one of the important constraints in the production of Chickpea in the Dangs. Since recent past The Dangs district of South Gujarat was declared as organic district and thus, afield experiment on biological management of chickpea wilt was formulated and conducted for three years. Two bio agents viz., T. viride 1.5% WP (2 x 10? cfu/g) (IIHR strain) and P. fluorescence 1.5% liquid form (1 x 10? cfu / ml) (NAU strain) were used as seed treatment and soil application. Among all the treatments, maximum disease control and grain production was reported in the seed treatment of T.viride @ 10g/kg of seeds + two soil applications of T.viride @ 2.5 kg /ha in 250 kg FYM at sowing and at 50% flowering with minimum wilt incidence (5.46 %)and highest grain yield (2513 kg/ ha) followed by the seed treatment of P. fluorescence @ 10 ml / kg of seeds + two soil applications of Pseudomonas fluorescence @ 2.5 l /ha in 250 kg FYM at sowing and at 50% flowering with the wilt incidence of (5.51 %) and highest grain yield (2471 kg / ha) over all the other treatment and control with positive effect on average plant height (cm), average numbers of branches/plant, average numbers of pods/plant, average numbers of root nodules/plant bio agent cfu /gm soil at harvest with high cost benefit ratio

References

1. Dobariya J.B., Thesiya N.M., Zinzala V.J. and Aklade S.A. (2016) J. Krishi Vigyan, 5(1), 19-22
2. Pandya J.R. (2010) PhD Thesis, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India.
3. Prasad R.D., Rangeshwaran R., Anuroop C.P. and Rashni H.J. (2002) Ann. Pl. Prot. Sci., 10(1), 72-75.
4. Rudresh D.I., Shivaprakash M.K. and Prasad D. (2005) Biological Control, 19(2), 157-166.
5. Nikam P.S., Jagtap G.P. and Sontakke P.L. (2007) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(12), 692-697.
6. Srivastava R., Abdul K., Singh U.S. and Sharma A.K. (2010) Biological Control, 53, 24-31.
7. Singh S.P., Singh H.B. and Singh D.K. (2013) The Bioscan, 8(3), 801-804.
8. Dubey S.C., Singh V. and Priyanka K. (2015) Biocontrol, 60, 413-424.
9. Mahmood Y., Khan M.A., Javed N. and Arif M.J. (2015) J. Anim. Plant Sci., 25(4), 1063-1071.
10. Pandey R.N. Gohel N.M. and Jaisani P. (2017) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6(5), 2516-2522.
11. Deshmukh A.J., Jaiman R.S., Bambharolia R.P. and Patil V.A. (2020) International Journal of Economic Plants, 7(1), 38-43.
12. Bawane A.S., Zacharia S. and Kar S.R. (2022) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(3), 1284-1288.
13. Joshi R., Sunkad G., Amaresh Y.S. and Kenganal M. (2022) Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2), 346-349.