USE OF BIOMATERIALS IN BONE DEFECT HEALING

V. PADMAJA¹, P. VEENA²*, R.V. SURESH KUMAR³, M. SANTHI LAKSHMI^4
1Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
²Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
³Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
⁴Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : vienoa8893@gmail.com

Received : 01-09-2023     Accepted : 28-10-2023     Published : 30-10-2023
Volume : 15     Issue : 10       Pages : 12692 - 12693
Int J Agr Sci 15.10 (2023):12692-12693

Keywords : Fracture fixation, Biomaterials, Nanocomposites
Academic Editor : Dr Abhijit K Barate, Dr Srinivas Sathapathy
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Chittoor Road, Tirupati, 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Bone defects, resulting from trauma, congenital anomalies, present significant challenges in orthopedics, necessitating innovative approaches for effective and functional tissue regeneration. This reviews the utilization of biomaterials in addressing bone defects for enhancing healing. It synthesizes advancements in biomaterial design and application for optimal bone regeneration. Key focus areas include biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and bioactivity of diverse materials, emphasizing their roles in fostering osteogenesis. It highlights significant studies and trends, underscoring the potential of biomaterials in overcoming challenges associated with bone repair. By providing a concise overview, this aims to inform researchers and clinicians about the ongoing progress in effective bone defect healing

1. Haas N.P. (2000) Chirurg, 71, 987-988.
2. Willie B.P.A., Schmidt-Bleek K., Cipitria A., et al. (2010) Soft Matter Journal, 6, 4976.
3. Killington K., Mafi R., Mafi P., Khan W. (2018) Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 13(4), 284-291.
4. Putzier M., Strube P., Funk J.F., et al. (2009) European Spine Journal, 18, 687-695.
5. Schell H., Duda G.N., Peters A., et al. (2017) Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 4, 5.
6. Schmidt-Bleek K., Petersen A., Dienelt A., Schwarz C., Duda G.N. (2014) Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 14, 247-259.
7. Lienau J., Schmidt-Bleek K., Peters A., et al. (2009) Journal of Orthopedic Research, 27, 1133-1140.
8. Nudelman F., Pieterse K., George A., et al. (2010) Nature Materials, 9, 1004-1009.
9. Kim S.S., Sun Park M., Yong Jeon O., Choi C., Kim B.S. (2006) Biomaterials, 27, 1399-1409.
10. Aulakh T.S., Jayasekera N., Kuiper J.H., Richardson J.B. (2009) Biomaterials, 30, 1732-1738.
11. Kothapalli C., Wei M., Vasiliev A., Shaw M.T. (2004) Acta Materialia, 52(19), 5655-5663
12. Song J.H., Kim H.E., Kim H.W. (2007) Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 83(1), 248-257.
13. Webster J., Massa-Schlueter E., Smith J., Slamovich E. (2004) Biomaterials, 25(11), 2111-2121.
14. Wang D.A., Williams C., Li Q., Sharma B., Elisseeff J. (2003) Biomaterials, 24(22), 3969-3980.
15. Le G.R. (1991) Monographs in Oral Science, 15, 1-201.
16. Webb A.R., Kumar V.A., Ameer G.A. (2007) Journal of Material Chemistry,17(9), 900-906.