INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND SOWING DATES ON YIELD COMPONENTS, YIELD AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF BLACK GRAM (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)

K. SINGH1*, T. SINGH2, R.K. TIWARI3, V.K. PRAJAPATI4
1Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, 485001, India
2Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, 485001, India
3Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, 485001, India
4Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, 485001, India
* Corresponding Author : kuldeepsingh623280@gmail.com

Received : 08-09-2023     Accepted : 28-10-2023     Published : 30-10-2023
Volume : 15     Issue : 10       Pages : 12689 - 12691
Int J Agr Sci 15.10 (2023):12689-12691

Keywords : Black gram, Date of sowing, Phosphorus levels, Urad, Yield
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, 485001, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SINGH, K., et al "INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND SOWING DATES ON YIELD COMPONENTS, YIELD AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF BLACK GRAM (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15.10 (2023):12689-12691.

Cite - APA : SINGH, K., SINGH, T., TIWARI, R.K., PRAJAPATI, V.K. (2023). INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND SOWING DATES ON YIELD COMPONENTS, YIELD AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF BLACK GRAM (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 15 (10), 12689-12691.

Cite - Chicago : SINGH, K., T. SINGH, R.K. TIWARI, and V.K. PRAJAPATI. "INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND SOWING DATES ON YIELD COMPONENTS, YIELD AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF BLACK GRAM (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15, no. 10 (2023):12689-12691.

Copyright : © 2023, K. SINGH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

During the Kharif season of 2022, an experiment was carried out to delve into the production potential and quality of black gram under the influence of phosphorus and different sowing dates. The treatment combinations from four levels of phosphorus i.e., P? (Control), P? (10 kg P?O? ha-1), P? (20 kg P?O? ha-1), P? (30 kg P?O? ha-1) and three dates of sowing i.e., D? (9?? July), D? (15?? July), D? (22?? July) were laid out in Factorial Randomized Block design and were replicated thrice. The results manifest that the use of 30 kg P?O? had a substantially higher number of pods plant-1 (21.96), number of seeds pod-1 (4.69), test weight (35.84 g), grain yield plot-1, (1.37 kg), grain yield (11.38 q ha-1), stover yield (27.33 q ha-1), harvest index (29.34%) and protein content (22.80%). The beneficial effect of sowing dates was also noticed and maximum values for the number of pods plant-1 (21.25), number of seeds pod-1 (4.40), test weight (35.01 g), grain yield plot-1, (1.27 kg), grain yield (10.56 q ha-1), stover yield (25.38 q ha-1), harvest index (29.22 %) and protein content (22.03 %) were obtained when the crop was sown on 9?? July. Therefore, it may be concluded that 30 kg P?O? ha-1 and sowing on 9?? July proved to be a better strategy to realize better production and higher protein content in the seeds of black gram

References

1. Anonymous (2020-2021) Crop-wise Area, Production and Productivity of Pulses from 2010-11 to 2020-21, DPD, GoI, Bhopal, 18.
2. Shekhawat A.S., Purohit H.S., Jain H.K., Meena R.H. and Meena R. (2018) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(2), 3419-3422.
3. Kachave R.R., Indulkar B.S., Vaidya P.H., Ingole A.J. and Patil N.M. (2018) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 7(7), 3359-3365.
4. Patidar K. and Singh T. (2018) Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 20(4), 428-431.
5. Kumawat P.K., Tiwari R.C., Golada S.L., Godara A.S., Garhwal R.S. and Choudhary R. (2013) Legume Research, 36(1), 70-73.
6. Niraj V.P.S. and Prakash V. (2014) An Asian Journal of Soil Science, 9(1), 117-120.
7. Parashar A., Jain M. and Tripathi L. (2020) Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci., 8(5), 276-280.
8. Mir A.H., Lal S.B., Salmani M., Abid M. and Khan I. (2013) SAARC J. Agri., 11(1), 1-6.
9. Jadhav P.B., Kamble D.R., Jadhav K.T. and Gadpale D.L. (2014) Adv. Res. J. Crop Improv., 5 (2), 166-171.
10. Patle T., Singh T. and Namdeo K.N. (2019) Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 21(4), 407-409.
11. Kumar K. and Kumar R. (2022) Agricultural Science Digest, 42(1), 84-87.
12. Pantora N., Kumar A. and Singh O.P. (2016) International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 5(6), 3821-3826.
13. Reddemma K., Reddy M.S., Ramesh Babu P.V. and Umamaheswari P. (2019) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(4), 2275-2278.