ESTIMATION OF BIOMASS YIELD OF WHEAT USING CANOPY REFLECTANCE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGE

R. BAGHEL1*, S.K. PYASI2, R. SHARMA3
1Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, India
2Professor of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, India
3Principal Scientist Agriculture & Soil Division, RSAC, Madhya Pradesh Council of Science and Technology, Bhopal, 462003, Madhya Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : rachnabjnkvv@gmail.com

Received : 19-09-2023     Accepted : 28-10-2023     Published : 30-10-2023
Volume : 15     Issue : 10       Pages : 12674 - 12680
Int J Agr Sci 15.10 (2023):12674-12680

Keywords : LAI meter, Chlorophyll meter, Spectrometer
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Director, Regional National Institute of Hydrology, Bhopal; Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Adhartal, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India and Agriculture & Soil Division, RSAC, Madhya Pradesh Council of Science and Technology, Bhopal, 462003, Madhya Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : BAGHEL, R., et al "ESTIMATION OF BIOMASS YIELD OF WHEAT USING CANOPY REFLECTANCE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGE ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15.10 (2023):12674-12680.

Cite - APA : BAGHEL, R., PYASI, S.K., SHARMA, R. (2023). ESTIMATION OF BIOMASS YIELD OF WHEAT USING CANOPY REFLECTANCE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGE . International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 15 (10), 12674-12680.

Cite - Chicago : BAGHEL, R., S.K. PYASI, and R. SHARMA. "ESTIMATION OF BIOMASS YIELD OF WHEAT USING CANOPY REFLECTANCE AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGE ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 15, no. 10 (2023):12674-12680.

Copyright : © 2023, R. BAGHEL, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The study was planned in village Halali of district Raisen to determine the vegetative canopy of wheat at different growth stages, to compare canopy reflectance/ radiance of wheat crop using radiometer observation, remote sensing data and recommendation of best method to examine the utility of hyperspectral remote sensing in predicting canopy characteristics such as LAI and canopy chlorophyll content in a crop. The study area belongs to eastern part of the fertile Vindyanchal Plateau. This study has been done for the data collected during humid subtropical climate with cool, dry winter’s a hot summer and a humid monsoon season. Reflectance observations available at very high (56m) spatial resplution from Advanced Wide- Field Sensore (AWiFS) sensore onboard Indian Remote Sensing, Resourcesat-2 satellite was used in this study. Forward simulation of canopy reflectance in four AWiFS band viz. GREEN (0.52um), RED(0.62-0.68um),NIR(0.77-0.86um),SWIR(1.55-1.70um)were carried out to generate the look up table using CRT model PROSIAL from all combinations of canopy intrinsic variable. An inversion technique based on minimization of cost function was used to retrieval LAI from LUT and observed AWiFS surface reflectance. The plant bio physical parameter of wheat was measured in different stage and reported as maximum plant height 79 cm, No. of leaf/plant 17, leaf length 42.68cm, leaf width 1.90cm, leaf area 64.20cm², chlorophyll content 73.25 micro gram /cm² LAI, 4.52, leaf water equivalent thickness 0.18 g/cm² and wheat yield 4300 kg ha-1. The plant bio physical parameters were taken from LAI meter, Chlorophyll meter and Spectroradiometer. These parameters were taken as input parameters for PROSIAL model. The simulated data & ground data were used to get R² by linear correlation. The linear correlation between simulated and ground data during the wheat growing season gave high coefficient of determination (R²= 0.99) in SWIR band. Relationships between wave length and spectral response were drawn by relative spectral response (RSR) for 2nm intervals using Lagrange’s interpolation scheme. The empirical regression models were developed for the study area by using in situ field observation and LAI was calculated during growing to harvesting crop season 2015-2016. A spatial yield maps of the study area were generated using LAI values and yield data, LAI values and NDVI values of crop season 2015-2016. The LAI Vs yield regression model showed positive correlation with equation (Y = 11.70x - 2.041) and (R² = 0.94). The LAI Vs NDVI regression model also gave higher coefficient of determination equation (Y = 643.3x + 1108.86) (R² = 0.93) as well as lowest standard error 0.02

References

1. FAO (2014a) Facts and figure on food and Biodiversity IRDC communication.
2. FAO (2014b) Food Outlook Biannual Report on global food markets.
3. Rao B.B., Chowdary P.S., Sandeep V.M., Pramod V.P. and Rao VU.M. (2015) Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200,192-202.
4. Anonymous (2011) Reference Manual.Chapter-1 FAO crop water productivity model to simulate yield response to water.
5. DWR (2014) Wheat Scenario, A Snippet- Directorate of Wheat Research
6. Wang F.M., Huang J.F. and Wang X.Z. (2008) Journal International Plant Biology, 50(3), 291-299.
7. Pradhan S., Bandyopadhyay K.K., Sahoo R.N., Sehgal V.K., Singh R., Gupta V.K. and Joshi D.K. (2014) Journal of the Indian Society Remote Sensing, 42(4),711-718.
8. Zhu Y., Li Y., Feng W., Tian Y., Yao X. and Cao W. (2006) Journal Plant Science, 86,1037-1046.
9. Ranjan R., Chopra U.K., Sahoo R.N., Singh A.K. and Pradhan S. (2012) International Journal Remote Sensing, 22(20), 6342-6360.
10. Mahajan G.R., Sahoo R.N., Pandey R.N., Gupta V.K. and Kumar D. (2014) Precision Agriculture, 15(2), 227-240.
11. Prabhakar M. Prasad Y.G., Thirupathi M., Sreedevi G., Dharajothi B. and Venkateswarlu B. (2011) Computer Electronic Agriculture, 79,189-198.
12. Prasannakumar N.R., Chander S. and Sahoo R.N. (2014) Phytoparasitica, 4, 387-395.
13. Hunt J., Ramond E. and Rock B.N. (1989) Remote Sensing Environment, 30, 45-54.
14. Jacquemoud S.W., Verhoef F., Baret C., Bacour P.J., Zarco-Tejada G.P., Asner H., François & Ustin S.L. (2009) Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 56-66.
15. Manjunath K.R. (2014) Journal Indian Society Remote Sensing, 42(1), 201-216.
16. Jacquemoud S. & Baret F. (1990) Remote Sensing of Environment, 34, 75-91.
17. Verhoef W. (1984) Sensing of Environment, 16, 125-141.
18. Verhoef W.L., Jia Q., Xiao & Z Su, (2007) IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1808-1822.
19. Darvishzadeh R.C., Atzberger A., Skidmore and Schlerf M., (2011) Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(6), 894-906.
20. Clevers J.G.P.W.L., Kooistra and Schaepman M.E., (2010) International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12, 119-125.
21. Campbell J.B. (1996) Introduction to Remote Sensing. Taylor and Francis, London, 622.
22. Champagne C.M., Staenz K., Bannari A., Mcnairn H. and Deguise J. C. (2003) Remote Sensing Environment, 87,148-160.
23. Gonsama A. (2011) International Journal Remote sensing, 32,2069-2080.
24. Haboudane D., Miller J.R., Trembley N., Zarco-Tejada P.J. and Dextraze L.(2002) Remote Sensing Environment, 81, 416-426.
25. Kumar L.K., Dury S.S. and Skidmore A. (2006) Basic principles and Prospective Applications, edited by F D van der Meer & S M de Jong (Springer), 111-155.
26. Markweel J., Osterman J.C. and Mitchell J.l. (1995) Photosynthesis research, 46, 467-472.
27. Matsushita B., Yang W., Chen J., Onda Y. and Qiu G. (2007) Sensors, 7,2636-2651.
28. Strachan I.B., Pattey E. and Boisvert J.B. (2002) Remote Sensing Environment, 80, 213-224.