T. PATEL1, R.A. PATEL2, P. PATEL3*
1Senior Research Fellow, Directorate of Research, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,388110, Gujarat, India
2Associate Research Scientist, Directorate of Research, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,388110, Gujarat, India
3Department of Agronomy, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,388110, Gujarat, India
* Corresponding Author : pinalpatel448@gmail.com
Received : 01-01-2023 Accepted : 28-01-2023 Published : 30-01-2023
Volume : 15 Issue : 1 Pages : 12192 - 12196
Int J Agr Sci 15.1 (2023):12192-12196
Keywords : Groundnut, Irrigation, Nitrogen, Vermicompost
Academic Editor : Dr Vijaya Lakshmi V, K.D. Gharde, Somnath Koley, Dr Prashant Shrivastava
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agronomy, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand,388110, Gujarat, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
An experiment was conducted at College Agronomy Farm, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat) during summer season of the year 2019 to study Effect of irrigation scheduling and nitrogen management on growth and yield of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The experiment were four irrigation schedules (IW: CPE ratios 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 and irrigation at critical growth stages flowering, branching, pod formation and pod development stages) and five nitrogen management treatments were tried. Irrigation level I? (0.8 IW: CPE ratio) recorded higher pod yield and haulm yield, nitrogen content in seed and haulm, nitrogen uptake by seed and haulm. The highest water use efficiency was recorded under treatment I?. Nitrogen management treatment N? (50% RDN through chemical fertilizer + 50% RDN through vermicompost) recorded significantly increase pod yield, haulm yield, nitrogen content in seed and haulm, nitrogen uptake by seed and haulm. The treatment combination I?N? recorded higher pod yield, haulm yield, nitrogen uptake by seed and haulm, net realization. Significantly higher WUE was recorded under treatment combination I?N?.
1. Anonymous (2015) Indian Statistical Department.
2. Gayathri J.A. (2018) Shanlax International Journal of Economics, 6(3), 15-21.
3. Panse V.G., Sukhatme P.V. (1978) Statistical methods for agricultural workers, ICAR Pub., New Delhi, 361.
4. Lokhande D.C, Jayewar N.E, Mundhe A.G. (2018) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6, 87-91.
5. Balasubramanian P., Babu R., Chinnamuthu C.R., Kumutha K., Mahendran P.P. (2019) International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11(7), 8268-8271.
6. Chitodkar S.S., Bhoi P.G., Patil H.E. & Pawar P.P. (2006) Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 30(2), 230-232.
7. Behera B.S., Das M., Behera A.C., Behera R.A. (2015) International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 5(5), 247-260.
8. Chaudhary J.H., Ramdev, Sutaliya & Desai L.J. (2015b) Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1), 369 -372.
9. Bhosle N.A., Pisal A.A., Gawade N.V. (2017) International Journal of Chemical Studies, 5(3), 110-112.
10. Meena M.K., Yadav B.L. & Meena N.R. (2016) Journal of Oilseed Brassica, 7(2), 148-155.
11. Raju B., Rao P.C, Reddy A.K., Rajesh K. (2013) Annals of Biological Research, 4(7), 222-226.