O. JITARWAL1*, S. BALODA2, PARVEEN3, M.C. BHATESHWAR4, M.K. JAT5, I. HAQMAL6
1Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
2Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
3Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
4Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, 303329, Rajasthan, India
5Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, 303329, Rajasthan, India
6Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India
* Corresponding Author : omprakashjitarwal@gmail.com
Received : 06-01-2023 Accepted : 29-01-2023 Published : 30-01-2023
Volume : 15 Issue : 1 Pages : 12169 - 12171
Int J Agr Sci 15.1 (2023):12169-12171
Keywords : Pomegranate, 100% RDF + FYM + Trichoderma
Academic Editor : Dr Hemangi Mehta, G Thirupathaiah
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, Haryana, India and Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, 303329, Rajasthan, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
The experimental plot was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications and nine treatments. The physio-chemical parameters such as fruit colour, fruit volume, fruits density, number of arils per fruit, peel per cent and juice per cent over control were recorded during course of the investigation. The study results indicated that, the superior values for fruit colour (4.21 visual), fruit volume (279 ml), fruits density (953.40 kg/m³), number of arils per fruit (59.80%), peel per cent (40.20%) and juice per cent (41.90%) were recorded in a plant treated with T5 treatment (100% RDF + FYM + Trichoderma) Which was closely followed by treatment T9 (75% RDF + FYM + Trichoderma)
1. Yasui K. (1936) Jap. Journal of Genetics, 12, 321.
2. Area and production of pomegranate in India (2020) Data year book of National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
3. Muhammad F. Shakir M.A. and Salik M.R. (2000) Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(9), 1370-1371.
4. Panse V.G. and Sukhatme P.V. (1985) Statistical method for Agriculture Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
5. Sacilik K.R., Ozturk R. and Keskin R. (2003) Bio Systems Engineering, 86(2), 191-198.
6. Kumar S., Singh A.K. and Yadav A.L. (2010) Plant Archives, 10(1), 317-319.
7. Kumar G., Thakur N., Singh G. and Tomar S. (2017) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 2333-2337.
8. Lal S. and Ahmed N. (2012) Progressive Horticulture, 44(1), 157-165.
9. Mandal K.K., Rajak A., Debnath S. and Hasan M.A. (2013) Journal of Crop and Weed, 9(1), 121-123.
10. Ram R.A., Bhriguvanshi S.R. and Pathak R.K. (2007) Acta Horticulture, 735, 345-350.
11. Firake N.N. and Kumbhar D.B. (2002) Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, 27(2), 146-148.
12. Dutta P., Kundu S. and Biswas S. (2010) Indian Journal Horticulture, 67(2), 181-184.
13. Lata R., Dwivedi D.H., Ram R.B. and Meena M.L. (2011) Indian Journal of Ecology, 38(1), 81-84.
14. Devi H.L., Mitra S.K. and Poi S.C. (2012) Acta Horticulture, 959, 201- 208.
15. Atom A. (2013) M.Sc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Latur, Maharashtra
16. Rathore R.S. and Chandra A. (2002) Current Agriculture, 26(1/2), 117-118.