J. REHAL1*, V. BENIWAL2
1Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India
2Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India
* Corresponding Author : jagbir@pau.edu
Received : 06-12-2022 Accepted : 28-12-2022 Published : 30-12-2022
Volume : 14 Issue : 12 Pages : 12040 - 12043
Int J Agr Sci 14.12 (2022):12040-12043
Keywords : Snack product, Okara¸ By-product utilization, Ready-to-cook, Frying
Academic Editor : Dr Rewa Kulshreshta
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
A convenient Ready-to cook (RTC) patty was developed with 20 %substitution with okara, a by-product of the soybean processing industry. Different methods of cooking viz., deep frying, shallow frying and air frying were employed and studies were conducted to know their effect on the sensorial, nutritional and textural characteristics of RTC patties. It was found that that the deep fried patty has maximum acceptability and whereas the air fried sample was only moderately acceptable with good nutritional composition. The lowest L* values were achieved in the deep fried samples and the highest b* values in the air fried samples which influence the sensorial scores of the product. The texture analysis of deep fried sample showed maximum compression force as opposed to the air fried sample. The RTC okara supplemented patty will help in effective utilization of industrial by-product as well as increase the nutritional potential of this popular snack
1. Nakano S., and Washizu A. (2020) Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 39(1), 1-6.
2. Rehal J., Kaur G., Kaur A., Singh A. (2017) Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 5(2), 15-21.
3. Rehal J., Aggarwal P. and Dhaliwal I. (2021) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 10(2), 1231-1238.
4. Qin P., Wang T., Luo Y. (2022) Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 7.
5. Jayachandran M. and Xu B. (2019) Food Chemistry, 271, 362-371.
6. Bolla K.N. and Santhi S.K.V. (2015) International Journal of Scientific Technology and Research, 4(7), 50-53.
7. Singh A.K., Kadam D.M., Sexena M. and Singh R.P. (2009) African Journal of Biochemistry Research, 3, 130-13.
8. Voss G.B., Sousa V., Rema P., Pintado M.E., Valente L.M.P. (2021) Animals, 11, 590.
9. Beniwal V. and Rehal J. (2017) Emerging Technologies Insight. Published by Gujran wala Guru Nanak Institute of Management and Technology, Ludhiana, 167-69.
10. Rehal J., Beniwal V., & Gill B.S. (2019) Legume Research, 42(1), 39-44.
11. AOAC (2016) Association of Official Analytical Chemists (edition 20th), Washington DC.
12. Farris, Flores, Shanklin, & Whitworth (1995) Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 11(4), 567-572.
13. Singh K.K., Mridula D., Barnwal P. and Rehal J. (2013) Food Bioprocess and Technology, 6(2), 598-605.
14. Rehal J.K., Aggarwal P., Dhaliwal I., Sharma M., Kaushik P.A. (2022) Horticulturae, 8,403.
15. Kaul S. and Rehal J. (2022) Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, DR-1839, 1-6.
16. Raleng A., Singh A., Chavan P., Attkan A., and Singh B. (2019) Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(7).
17. Yusuf A.A, Ayedun H. & Sanni L.O. (2007) Food Chemistry, 111, 277–282.
18. Lawal O.S., Adebowale K.O. (2004) Nahrung/Food, 48(2), 129-136.
19. Barbut S. (1999) Methods of Testing Protein Functionality, Hall, G.M. (Ed.). Blackie Academic and Professional, New York, 186-225.
20. Teruel M.D.R., Gordon M., Linares M.B., Garrido M.D., Ahromrit A. and Niranjan K. (2015) Journal of Food Science, 80(2), E349-E358.