SCREENING OF MUSTARD GENOTYPES AGAINST MUSTARD SAWFLY (Athelia proxima) AND LEAF WEBBER (Crocidolomia binotalis)

D.T. GAIKWAD1, V.N. NANDANWAR2, K.P. BUDHVAT3*
1Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Nagpur, 440001, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444104, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Nagpur, 440001, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444104, Maharashtra, India
3Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati, 444603, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444104, Maharashtra, India
* Corresponding Author : budhvatkiran2@gmail.com

Received : 03-12-2022     Accepted : 27-12-2022     Published : 30-12-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 12       Pages : 11956 - 11958
Int J Agr Sci 14.12 (2022):11956-11958

Keywords : Mustard, Genotypes, Athelia proxima, Crocidolomia binotalis
Academic Editor : Dr Lekha Rawal, Rahul Bhardwaj, Dharmendra Singh Bhati
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Nagpur, 440001, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444104, Maharashtra, India and Shri Shivaji Agriculture College, Amravati, 444603, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444104, Maharashtra, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : GAIKWAD, D.T., et al "SCREENING OF MUSTARD GENOTYPES AGAINST MUSTARD SAWFLY (Athelia proxima) AND LEAF WEBBER (Crocidolomia binotalis)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.12 (2022):11956-11958.

Cite - APA : GAIKWAD, D.T., NANDANWAR, V.N., BUDHVAT, K.P. (2022). SCREENING OF MUSTARD GENOTYPES AGAINST MUSTARD SAWFLY (Athelia proxima) AND LEAF WEBBER (Crocidolomia binotalis). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (12), 11956-11958.

Cite - Chicago : GAIKWAD, D.T., V.N. NANDANWAR, and K.P. BUDHVAT. "SCREENING OF MUSTARD GENOTYPES AGAINST MUSTARD SAWFLY (Athelia proxima) AND LEAF WEBBER (Crocidolomia binotalis)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 12 (2022):11956-11958.

Copyright : © 2022, D.T. GAIKWAD, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to evaluate different genotypes of mustard against mustard sawfly (Athelia proxima) and Leaf webber (Crocidolomia binotalis) during Rabi season of 2015-2016 at College of Agriculture, Nagpur (Dr. PDKV, Akola). The Trail was laid out in randomized block design with fifteen treatments and three replications. The results were found to be statistically significant. The significantly lowest larval population of mustard sawfly was recorded in Geeta (2.32 per plant) and it was at par with Seeta, Laxmi, Varuna, Ashirvad and GM-2. Whereas maximum population of mustard sawfly was recorded on the genotype ACN-9 (11.32 per plant) which was at par with Sej-2, Pusa bold, Urvashi, Bio-902, Pusabahar, Kranti and Rohini, respectively. The mean larval population of leaf webber (at 30, 60 and 90 DAS) in all genotypes of mustard was observed in the range of 2.73 to 11.60 per plant. However, the minimum population of leaf webber larvae was recorded in ACN-9 (2.73 per plant) and found statistically at par with GM-2, Seeta, Kranti, Bio 902, Ashirvad, Rohini and Vardan, Whereas, maximum leaf webber larvae were recorded on the genotype Varuna (11.60 per plant) which was at par with Pusa bold, Laxmi, Geeta, Sej-2 and Urvashi

References

1. Dash L. and Konarand A. (2019) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 8(8), 2998-3004.
2. Nagraj (1995) Indian Journal of Entomology, 62(1), 34-42.
3. Nasir (1994) Journal of Applied Zoological Researches, 11, 23-24.
4. Bhatti M. and Singh A. (1976) Indian Journal of Entomology, 63(3), 285-289.
5. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (2008) Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, 543.
6. Mustard Crop Survey Report (2015) Indian Oilseed Database, 551.
7. Arya S., Singh G., Singh D.V., Singh R., Mishra P., Singh A., Patel P.K. and Kavya N. (2022) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(11), 1303-1309
8. Bakhetia D.R.C. and Arora R. (1989) Indian journal of plant protection and environment, 23(1), 653-659.
9. Bakhetia D. R. C. and Arora R. (1993) Current Biotica, 3(5), 51-53.
10. Divakaran M. and Babu K.N. (2016) Science Direct, 9-19.
11. Hugar P. G., Anandhi P. and Varma S. (2008) Journal of Entomological Research, 32(2), 109-112.
12. Joshi M.D., Pawar V.R., and Bapodra J.N. (2009) International Journal of plant protection, 2(2), 209-210.
13. Nathuram N. and Sharma G. (1999) Sarhad Journal Agric., 23, 3.
14. Bhati R. and Wani S. (2013) Int. Jcrr Sci., 125-132.
15. Sachan G.C. and Sharma J.P. (1986) Plant Protection, 399-423.
16. Shukla R.P. (1990) Tropical Pest Management, 36(2), 85-88.
17. Singh H.S. and Singh R. (1982) Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 8(1), 17-19.
18. Takar B.L., Deshwal H.L. and Jat B.L. (2003) Int. Jcrr Sci., 125-132.
19. Vinyas S.N., Neharkar P.S., Bantewad S.D. and Matre Y.B. (2022) Biological Forum-An International Journal, 14(4), 07-10.
20. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) Statistical procedure for agriculture research pub. by john Wiley and sons, New York, 643-644.
21. Pawar V.R., Bapodra J.G., Joshi M.D. and Gaikwad. (2009) Agric.sci. Digest, 29(3), 230-231.