BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO UMBILICAL INFECTION IN VRINDAVANI CALVES

BRIJESH PATEL1*, MUKESH SINGH2
1Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Agriculture and Research Station, Raigarh, 496001, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Krishak Nagar, Raipur, 492012, Chhattisgarh, India
2Department of Livestock Production and Management, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : romi10888@gmail.com

Received : 04-11-2022     Accepted : 27-11-2022     Published : 30-11-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 11       Pages : 11862 - 11864
Int J Agr Sci 14.11 (2022):11862-11864

Keywords : Behaviour, Umbilical infection, Vrindavani Calves
Academic Editor : A. A. Shahane
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Agriculture and Research Station, Raigarh, 496001, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Krishak Nagar, Raipur, 492012, Chhattisgarh, India and Department of Livestock Production and Management, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : PATEL, BRIJESH and SINGH, MUKESH "BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO UMBILICAL INFECTION IN VRINDAVANI CALVES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.11 (2022):11862-11864.

Cite - APA : PATEL, BRIJESH, SINGH, MUKESH (2022). BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO UMBILICAL INFECTION IN VRINDAVANI CALVES. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (11), 11862-11864.

Cite - Chicago : PATEL, BRIJESH and MUKESH, SINGH. "BEHAVIOR IN RELATION TO UMBILICAL INFECTION IN VRINDAVANI CALVES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 11 (2022):11862-11864.

Copyright : © 2022, BRIJESH PATEL and MUKESH SINGH, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A study on the behavior of Vrindavani calves in relation to sickness was conducted. Eighty calves ranging from 0 to 3 months of age were selected. A daily examination was conducted for clinical signs of umbilical infections in all calves. In our research, we found 10 calves with umbilical infection (navel-ill). During the study period, calves with umbilical infections were selected as sick calves. The matched pair was a healthy calf born on the same day, of the same breed, and at a comparable age as each ill calf. All experimental calves were separated into two equal groups, Healthy (Control) and Sick (Treatment), following a clinical assessment. Behavioral observations were observed during day hours by CCTV camera. Calves with navel-ill more likely to be short lying than their healthy cohorts (p<0.05). Ventral lying and short lying were observed in 40% (4/10) and 20% (2/10) of navel-ill calves, respectively. Ventral lying was observed in 50% (5/10) of calves in the control group. Lateral lying and lying with neck extended was observed in 30 % (3/10) calves and 10 % (1/10) calf in the navel-ill group, respectively. For the human approach test, 60% (6/10) of calves never approached the observer, 10% (1/10) approached the observer during only one observation period, 10% (1/10) approached the observer at two of the observation periods, and 20 % (2/10) of calves approached the observer during all three observation periods. In vigilance test significant (p<0.05) difference were observed in face response

References

1. Jozica J., Tadej M. and Martina K. (2012) Acta Agric. Slov., 3, 295-298.
2. Kumaresan A., Behera K., Mohanty T.K., Shiv Prasad and Layek S.S. (2009) IntasPolivet, 10(II), 129-138.
3. Radostits O.M., Gay C.C., Blood D.C. and Hinchcliff (2009) 10th edn., New York, W.B. Saunders Company Ltd., 779-781.
4. Hart B.L. (1988) Neuro sci. Bio behav. Rev., 12, 123-137.
5. Molony V., Kent J.E. and McKendrick I.J. (2002) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 76, 215-238.
6. Griffith F.L.I. (1898) Bernard Quartich, London, UK.
7. Weary D.M., Niel L., Flower F.C. and Fraser D. (2009) Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 100, 64-76.
8. Eberhardt T., Grimm H., Richter, T. and Savary P. (2003) In: K. Janni (Ed.) Proc. 5th Int. Dairy Housing Conf., Fort Worth, TX. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI, 350-355.
9. Johnson R.W. (2002) Vet. Immunol. Immunopath. 87, 443-450.
10. McGuirk S.M. (2008) Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract., 24, 139-153.
11. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. (1989) Statistical methods. 6th Ed., The lowa State University Press, Ames, Lowa, USA.
12. Todd C.G. (2007) MSc Thesis thesis, University of Guelph.
13. Schrama J.W., Arieli A., Brandsma H.A., Luiting P. and Verstegen M.W. (1993) J.Anim. Sci., 71, 3285-3292.
14. Stanton A. (2011) Doctoral thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.