P. SHINDHE1, N. RAJESHWARI2*, M. RAGINI3, B. JHANSI4, V. CHANDAWARI5
1Department of Commerce, Govt. First Grade College, Hubli, 580032, Karnataka University, Dharwad, 580003, Karnataka, India
2rofessor and Head, Department of Extension and Communication Management, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, Karnataka, India
3Department of Extension and Communication Management, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, Karnataka, India
4Department of Extension and Communication Management, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, Karnataka, India
5Department of Extension and Communication Management, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, Karnataka, India
* Corresponding Author : rajeshwarinavaneeth@gmail.com
Received : 04-11-2022 Accepted : 27-11-2022 Published : 30-11-2022
Volume : 14 Issue : 11 Pages : 11858 - 11861
Int J Agr Sci 14.11 (2022):11858-11861
Keywords : Knowledge on computers, Communication tools, Computer skill, Information and communications technologies
Academic Editor : Dr Prashant Shrivastava, Amit Anil Shahane, Dr Vijaya Lakshmi V, Dr Hemangi Mehta, Vikas Kumar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Extension and Communication Management, College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, Karnataka, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Computer is a useful tool to update the knowledge. A study was conducted in the year 2020-21 to assess the knowledge and usage pattern of computer by agricultural university and traditional university students. The study consists of self-administered close ended questionnaire survey. Google form was administered to agricultural and non agricultural students. The study was conducted for 120 students of which 60 belonged to agricultural University and 60 belong to traditional University. In the selected samples, a large majority of the respondents (96.67%) of agricultural university students and majority 60.00 per cent of traditional University students had knowledge about computers and they were introduced to improve the quality of life, make work easier and faster. More than half (58.88 per cent) of the agricultural University students and 53.33 per cent of traditional University students had computer classes at school respectively, on an average of 80.00 per cent of agricultural university and traditional university students belonged to age group of 18-20 years. With respect to overall medium of instruction majority 76.66 per cent knew to speak English and 29.16 per cent knew to speak Kannada. However, 88.89 per cent of agricultural university students and 90.00 per cent of traditional university students had knowledge about output devices (Printer and Monitor). Majority 75.56 per cent of agricultural university students and 83.33 per cent of traditional university students had knowledge on MS word which is used for typing. Majority 63.33 per cent of agricultural university students and 43.33 per cent of traditional university students had knowledge regarding information that can be stored in Floppy, Scanner and Monitor
1. Aduwa Ogiegbaen S.E. and Iyamu E.O.S. (2005) Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 104-112.
2. Balasubramanian K., Clarke-Okah W., Daniel J., Ferreira F., Kanwar A., Kwan A., West P. (2009) ICTs for Higher Education.Background paper, UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education Paris.
3. Jali P.K., Singh S., Babaji P., Chaurasia V.R., Somasundaram P. and Lau H. (2014) Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 4(1), 29.
4. Ram R., Goyal T.C., Kumar R., Bajroliya R., Kumari A. and Bhumra H. (2021) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(3S), 31-35.
5. Sunaina S., Richard K.W. (2019) Language and Literacy Practices that Influence Bilingual and Bi-Literate Acquisition in L1 Kannada and L2 English in Bangalore, India Handbook of Literacy in Akshara Orthography, 1(17), 285.
6. Khotimah K. (2012) The Use of Round Robin Brainstorming to Improve Students’ Listening Skill at the Tenth Grade of SMK NegeriKaranganyar in the Academic Year 2011/2012. PhD Thesis Unpublished, PBI-FKIP.
7. Ramaiah C.K. and Daimari B.M. (2022) Journal of Library & Information Technology, 42(3).
8. Sperry R. (2021) Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 36(7), 11-19.
9. Bowman C.F. (2021) How Things Work: The Computer Science Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 23.
10. Pawar J.B. (2009) M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.