IMPACT OF BUTTER ON QUALITY OF GOAT MEAT SPREAD

M. RAZIUDDIN1*, R. NARENDRA BABU2, V. APPA RAO3
1Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, 600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, 600051, Tamil Nadu, India
2Professor & Head, Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, 600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, 600051, Tamil Nadu, India
3Dean, Faculty of Food Sciences, College of Food and Dairy Technology, Alamathy-Koduveli, Chennai, 600051, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, 600051, Tamil Nadu, India
* Corresponding Author : dr_razi@rediffmail.com

Received : 03-11-2022     Accepted : 27-11-2022     Published : 30-11-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 11       Pages : 11815 - 11817
Int J Agr Sci 14.11 (2022):11815-11817

Keywords : Spread, Butter, Physcio-chemical quality, Instrumental colour profile, Sensory quality
Academic Editor : Dr Meera Kumari, Saket Kumar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, 600007, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, 600051, Tamil Nadu, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : RAZIUDDIN, M., et al "IMPACT OF BUTTER ON QUALITY OF GOAT MEAT SPREAD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.11 (2022):11815-11817.

Cite - APA : RAZIUDDIN, M., NARENDRA BABU, R., APPA RAO, V. (2022). IMPACT OF BUTTER ON QUALITY OF GOAT MEAT SPREAD. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (11), 11815-11817.

Cite - Chicago : RAZIUDDIN, M., R. NARENDRA BABU, and V. APPA RAO. "IMPACT OF BUTTER ON QUALITY OF GOAT MEAT SPREAD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 11 (2022):11815-11817.

Copyright : © 2022, M. RAZIUDDIN, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

It is a common myth that adding butter to meals makes it taste better and enhances other flavours. Investigation was done to develop goat meat spread added with various concentrations of butter viz., 1.0, 3.0and 5.0 per cent and the final quality of products was assessed based on physico-chemical quality, instrumental colour profile analysis and sensory quality. The pH of spread was significant (P<0.05) increased whereas cooking yield and spread ability was increased highly significant (P<0.01) with increase in concentration of butter. Further, highly significant (P<0.01) decrease in redness (a*) and increase in lightness (L*) was observed after incorporation of butter. The Yellowness (b*) of product was significant (P<0.05) increased. All the sensory attributes of spread were exhibited highly significant (P<0.01) differences except texture and adhesive ability. Sensory quality of goat meat spread was increase significant (P<0.05) with increase in concentration of butter upto 3% and thereafter the sensory quality was decreased. Thus, based on results it may be concluded that incorporation of 3.0% butter was most suitable for development of goat meat spread

References

1. Norman G.A. (1991) In, Lawrie R.A. (Ed.), Developments in Meat Science, vol. 5. Elsevier Science Publishers, Essex, England, 89-157.
2. Casey N.H., Van Niekerk W.A., Webb E.C. (2003) Goat meat. In, Caballero B., Trugo L., Finglass P. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. Academic Press, London, 2937-2944.
3. Pike M.I., Smith G.C., Carpenter Z.L. (1973) J. Anim. Sci., 37(269).
4. Jean I.J., Work R., Camire M.E., Briggs J., Barrett, A.H. and Bushway A.A. (1996) J. of Food Sci., 61(4), 783-789.
5. Nawar W.W. (1996) Lipids. In, Food Chemistry (ed. OR Fennema), 3rd edn., 225–319. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York.
6. Wendin K. (2001) Chalmers Tekniska Högsk, Göteborg.
7. Guinard J.X., Wee C., McSunas A., Fritter D. (2002) Food Quality and Preference 13, 129-37.
8. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Hyvönen L. (1995) Food Quality and Preference 6, 127-33.
9. FörareWinblad L. (2000) Gourmet mitt ismöret. Gourmet 2, 66-77.
10. Whittington R., Webb M. (1995) Quaglino’s. The Cook Book. Conran Octupus Ltd., London.
11. Hemberg B., Eriksson F. (2002) BonniersKokbok (Bonniers Cookbook). Albert Bonniers Förlag AB, Stockholm.
12. Raziuddin M., Babu R.N., Appa Rao V., Ramesh S. and Karunakaran R. (2021) Asian J. of Dairy and Food Res., 40(4), 461-465.
13. Raziuddin M., Babu R.N., Appa Rao V., Ramesh S. and Karunakaran R (2020) Intern. J. Liv. Res., 10(10), 230-238.
14. Verma A.K., Banerjee R. and Sharma B.D. (2012) Asian Aust. J. of Animal Sci., 25, 291-298.
15. Trout, E.S., Hunt N.C., Johnson D.E., Claus J.R., Kastner C.L., Kropf D.H., Stroda S. (1992) J. of Food Sci., 57, 25-29.
16. Bachhav Y.G., Patravale V.B. (2009) Int. J. of Pharm., 365, 175-9.
17. Bindu J., Ravishankar C.V. and Gopal T.K.S. (2007) J. of Food Eng., 78, 995-1000.
18. Keeton J.T. (1983) J. of Food Sci., 48(3), 878-881.
19. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. (1995) Statistical methods. 8th Edn, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
20. Mendiratta S.K., Shinde A.T., Mane B.G. (2013) J. Meat Sci. Technol., 1, 71-76.
21. Dzudie T., Scher J., Hardy J. (2002) J. Food Eng., 52, 143-147.