EVALUATION OF MARIGOLD FOR QUALITY FLOWER AND SEED PRODUCTION UNDER BIHAR CONDITIONS

PRIYANKA KUMARI1, DEEPTI SINGH2*
1Department of Horticulture (Vegetable and Floriculture), Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, Bihar, India
2Department of Horticulture (Vegetable and Floriculture), Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, Bihar, India
* Corresponding Author : singh.deepti2008@gmail.com

Received : 04-09-2022     Accepted : 27-09-2022     Published : 30-09-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 9       Pages : 11655 - 11657
Int J Agr Sci 14.9 (2022):11655-11657

Keywords : Marigold, Evaluation, Genotypes, Growth, Flowering, Seed Attributes
Academic Editor : Divyanshu Gupta, Dr Lawal Mohammad Anka
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Horticulture (Vegetable and Floriculture), Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, Bihar, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : KUMARI, PRIYANKA and SINGH, DEEPTI "EVALUATION OF MARIGOLD FOR QUALITY FLOWER AND SEED PRODUCTION UNDER BIHAR CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.9 (2022):11655-11657.

Cite - APA : KUMARI, PRIYANKA, SINGH, DEEPTI (2022). EVALUATION OF MARIGOLD FOR QUALITY FLOWER AND SEED PRODUCTION UNDER BIHAR CONDITIONS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (9), 11655-11657.

Cite - Chicago : KUMARI, PRIYANKA and DEEPTI, SINGH. "EVALUATION OF MARIGOLD FOR QUALITY FLOWER AND SEED PRODUCTION UNDER BIHAR CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 9 (2022):11655-11657.

Copyright : © 2022, PRIYANKA KUMARI and DEEPTI SINGH, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Evaluation of twelve marigold genotypes for quality flower and seed production was done under Bihar conditions during the year 2021-22 to identify suitable variety for commercial and quality flower production. Twelve varieties namely Pusa Basanti Gainda, Hisar Beauty, Hisar Jafari-2, Sutton Orange, Brocade Mix, Sutton Yellow, Crackerjack, Bonita Bolero, Pusa Narangi Gainda, Orange Bunch, Inca Yellow and Inca Orange were grown for evaluation. This experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. Significant differences were recorded among the evaluated marigold genotypes for growth, flowering and seed attributes. Genotype Crackerjack recorded maximum plant height (72.19 cm), whereas Brocade Mix was earliest to flower (44.78 days). Genotype Sutton Orange yielded flowers with maximum floral diameter (6.84 cm) and peduncle length(2.71cm), while genotype Hisar Jafari-2 recorded maximum number of secondary branches per plant (62.26) and flower yield per plant (676.87 g). Genotype Bonita Bolero recorded significantly minimum days taken to seed ripening(79.11 days), whereas Pusa Narangi Gainda produced maximum number of seed per peduncle (190.89), weight of seed per peduncle (0.71 g) and seed yield per plant (134.98 g)

References

1. Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, GoI (2019) Horticulture Statistics at a Glance, 490.
2. Panse V.G. and Sukhatme P.V. (1984) Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication, 87-89.
3. Nagashree D., Kulkarni B.S. (2020) Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 23(2), 130-134.
4. Sharma G. and Basavaraj J. (2021) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(4), 1448-1460.
5. Chanchal D., Markam P.S., Tamrakar S.K. and Qureshi A. (2021) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 10(9), 2114-1217.
6. Mehmood, Rahim G. and Wahid A. (2020) Journal of Ornamental Plants, 10(4), 247-242.
7. Netam M., Sharma G., Shukla A. (2019) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, SP2, 234-237.
8. Suvija N.V., Nithin Sand Sreya B. (2019) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(7), 2148-2161.
9. Umesh C., Sreelatha U., Sainamole K.P. and Narayanankutty C. (2019) Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 46(1), 86-91.
10. Patokar M.J., GajbhiyeR.P., Patil S.,BayaskarS.R.,Moon S.S. (2018) Journal of soils and Crops, 28(1), 194-198.
11. Tamut O., Singh P.K. and Panwar S. (2019) International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(4), 964-968.
12. Nishtha (2022) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(1), 1220-1224.
13. Beniwal B.S. and Sheoran S. (2022) The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(4), 494-498.
14. Dhanasekaran D., Lenin A.R. (2019) Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 9(8), 20-27.
15. Lohar A., Majumder J., Sarkar A. and Rai B. (2018) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(10), 241-248.
16. Kumar V., Radhey S., Pal M., Ojha M.D., Singh A.P., Verma R.K. and Singh P.K. (2020) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(3), 922-924.
17. Raghuvanshi A. and Sharma B.P. (2011) Progressive Agriculture, 11(1), 123-126
18. Singh D. and Misra K.K. (2012) Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 46(1), 64-72.