PRODUCTION OF RAGI (FINGER MILLET) IN KARNATAKA FARMERS NEED BETTER INCENTIVES

H. CHANDRASHEKAR1*, K.B. VEDAMURTHY2, R. RANGEGOWDA3
1Former Professor of Statistics (Rtd), University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India
2Head, Department of Dairy Business Management, Dairy Science College, Hebbal, 560024, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Bidar, 585401, Karnataka, India
3Department of Dairy Business Management, Dairy Science College, Hebbal, 560024, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Bidar, 585401, Karnataka, India
* Corresponding Author : chandrashekar.ppmc@gmail.com

Received : 01-05-2022     Accepted : 27-05-2022     Published : 30-05-2022
Volume : 14     Issue : 5       Pages : 11346 - 11351
Int J Agr Sci 14.5 (2022):11346-11351

Keywords : Trend analysis, Structural break in ragi, Cost of cultivating ragi-CostC2, Market Intervention
Academic Editor : Pushpendra Singh, Bikash Subba, Dr B. S. Vyakarnahal
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, 560065, Karnataka, India. Authors are also thankful to Department of Dairy Business Management, Dairy Science College, Hebbal, 560024, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Bidar, 585401, Karnataka, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : CHANDRASHEKAR, H., et al "PRODUCTION OF RAGI (FINGER MILLET) IN KARNATAKA FARMERS NEED BETTER INCENTIVES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14.5 (2022):11346-11351.

Cite - APA : CHANDRASHEKAR, H., VEDAMURTHY, K.B., RANGEGOWDA, R. (2022). PRODUCTION OF RAGI (FINGER MILLET) IN KARNATAKA FARMERS NEED BETTER INCENTIVES. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 14 (5), 11346-11351.

Cite - Chicago : CHANDRASHEKAR, H., K.B. VEDAMURTHY, and R. RANGEGOWDA. "PRODUCTION OF RAGI (FINGER MILLET) IN KARNATAKA FARMERS NEED BETTER INCENTIVES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 14, no. 5 (2022):11346-11351.

Copyright : © 2022, H. CHANDRASHEKAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Karnataka state has given importance to dry land development research since last five and half decades. Due to concerted efforts put forth by the State Agricultural Universities, they were able release cultivars especially in minor cereals like ragi, predominantly grown in dry land areas which are high yielding and drought resistant. Finger millet commonly known as ragi widely grown in Africa and Asia and is originally native to the Ethopian highlands. Ragi has been found in an Indian excavation which is dated at 1800 BC. Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana are the major states where it is grown under semi-arid conditions. State accounts for nearly 60 percent of total area under the crop. The improvement of yields in ragi crop has not enabled farmers to realize higher returns due to high cost of cultivation. There is has been a drastic decline in area under ragi crop as farmers are opting for better substitutes. Farmers need support in the form of input subsides, remunerative price to their produce besides putting in place efficient procurement operation. Such comprehensive policy measures are crucial to arrest declining trend observed in the area under ragi crop as ragi being the staple food crop of half of the population of the State

References

1. Achaya K.T. (2003) The Story of Our Food, Universities Press, 21, ISBN978-81-7371-293-7.
2. Government of India (GOI)(2021) Assessment of Agricultural Households and Land and Holdings of Households in Rural India,2019. NSS 77th Round (January –December 2019), Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, National Statistical Office, Situation New Delhi.
3. Jena D. and Mishra S. (2022) Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. LVII No.18, April 30 2022.
4. Suresh A.S., Raju S., Chauhan S. and Chaudhary K.R. (2014) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(11), 123-29.
5. Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) Price Policy for Kharif Crops, (different years), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.
6. Suresh K. and Chandrakanth M.G. (2015) Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 3(3), 199-205.
7. National Academy of Agricultural Science (2013) Role of Millets in nutritional security of India, policy paper 66, New Delhi.