A. DEBNATH1*, P. DEB2
1Department of Horticulture & Post-Harvest Technology, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, 731236, West Bengal, India
2Department of Horticulture & Post-Harvest Technology, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, 731236, West Bengal, India
* Corresponding Author : abhijitdebnathhorticulture@gmail.com
Received : 02-05-2022 Accepted : 27-05-2022 Published : 30-05-2022
Volume : 14 Issue : 5 Pages : 11336 - 11341
Int J Agr Sci 14.5 (2022):11336-11341
Keywords : Bi-plot, Genetic diversity, Indigenous, Jackfruit, PCA, Tripura
Academic Editor : Swapnil Pandey, Dr B. S. Vyakarnahal, M P Wankhade, Dr Hemangi Mehta, Abdulbary Meison, Dharmendra Singh Bhati
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Horticulture & Post-Harvest Technology, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan, 731236, West Bengal, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
In the present research study, which was conducted during 2019-21, the genetic diversity, existing among the indigenous germpalsm of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) of northern Tripura state, was observed on the light Principal Component Analysis (PCA), depending on 32 (thirty-two) numbers of tree morphological and fruit physical as well as bio-chemical attributes. first Principal Component (PC 1) exhibited negative association with majority of these traits except, fruit stalk diameter, number of fruit per cluster, weight of fresh flakes with seed, weight of fresh flakes without seed and flake (bulb)/seed ratio, while second and third Components showed nearly equal negative as well as positive association with these quantitative traits of jackfruit under study. The combined scoring bi-plot of PCA revealed that majority of the important tree characteristics, yield attributes and fruit bio-chemical parameters were associated in the first quadrant with accessions of jackfruit, such as JF-12, JF-21, JF-30, JF-35, JF-11, JF-23 and JF-1
1. Chandler W.H. (1958) Philadelphia, Lea and Fibiger, 343-344.
2. Purseglove J.W. (1968) Tropical crops. Dicotyledons 2, Longman and Green Co. Ltd. London and Harlog, 384-386.
3. Popenoe W. (1974) Manual of tropical and sub-tropical fruits. Hafner Press, Division of Macmillan Publishing Co.
4. Bailey L.H. (1949) Manual of cultivated plants. Macmillan Co., New York, 338.
5. Merrill E.D. (1912) A Flora of Manila. Bu. of Printing, Manila, 369.
6. Corner E.J.H. (1988) Notes on the systematics and distribution of Malayan phanerogams II. The jack and the chempedak. Gardener. Bull. 10, 56-81.
7. Campbell C.W. (1984) Tropical fruits and nuts. In: Martin F.W. (ed) CRC Handbook of Tropical Food Crops, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.
8. Barrau J. (1976). Breadfruit and relatives. In: Simmonds N.W. (ed.), Evolution of crop plants, Longman, London, 201-202.
9. Frey K.L. (1966). Plant Breeding. Iowa state University Press, Iowa, USA.
10. Roy S. (2008) In: Better Quality of Rural Life: North East Regions Tribal (Edn. by Verma S.B. and Sharma M.K.), 32, 336-343.
11. Hotelling H. (1933) J. of Edu. Psychology, 24, 498-520.
12. Pearson K. (1901) Philosophical mag., 2(11), 559-572.
13. Banfield C.F. (1978) J. of Stat. and Comp. Simulation, 6, 211-222.
14. Jackson J.E. (1991) A User’s Guide to Principal Components. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
15. Ehrenberg A.S.C. (1985) Data Reduction Analysis and Interpreting Statistical Data. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 24(1), 54-56.
16. Forsley C.G. (1986) http.//eap.mcgill.ca/CPTFP_7.htm.
17. Barden J.A., Delvalle T.B.G. and Myers S.C. (1989) J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 114, 18486.
18. Farrokhi J., Darvishzadeh R., Maleki H.H. and Naseri L. (2013) Agric. Conspec. Sci. 78, 307-313.
19. Crossa I.H., Delacy H.I. and Taba S. (1995) (Edn. by Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., Hintum T.J.L.V. and Morales E.A.V.), John Wiley and Sons, Chic ester, 35-54.
20. Hintum T.J.L.V. (1995) (Edn. By Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., Hintum T.J.L.V. and Morales E.A.V.), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 77-92.