F. MRIDHA1*, S. HALDER2, C.K. GHOSH3
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Science, Kolkata, 700037, West Bengal, India
2Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Science, Kolkata, 700037, West Bengal, India
3Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Science, Kolkata, 700037, West Bengal, India
* Corresponding Author : falgunimridha82@gmail.com
Received : 23-03-2022 Accepted : 13-04-2022 Published : 30-04-2022
Volume : 14 Issue : 4 Pages : 11232 - 11233
Int J Agr Sci 14.4 (2022):11232-11233
Keywords : Saturation of peripheral Oxygen (SpO2), Propofol, Thiopental sodium
Academic Editor : Abdul Khalil Gardezi, Rajesh Kumar Meena
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Faculty of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Science, Kolkata, 700037, West Bengal, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
In present study total 18 clinical cases of dogs in three groups were anesthetized by propofol, thiopental sodium and their mixture (1:1) separately. The Saturation of peripheral Oxygen study was done prior to anaesthesia (0 minute), after induction, after anaesthesia (15 minutes, 30 minutes and 45 minutes) and after recovery by using Multi Para Monitor EXCELLO (BPL LTD., BPL Towers, 13 Kasturba Road, Bangalore, 560001). Saturation of peripheral Oxygen decreased significantly (P<0.05) at 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 45 minutes after induction in all the three groups. There were non-significant changes between 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 45 minutes after induction and it may be concluded that propofol, thiopental sodium and their mixture caused decrease of Saturation of peripheral Oxygen (SpO2) level which were within manageable physiological range and anesthetics should consider supplemental oxygen during general anesthesia
1. Jubran A. (2015) Crit Care, 19(1), 272.
2. Pretto J.J., Roebuck T., Beckert L. and Hamilton G. (2014) Respirology, 19, 38-46.
3. Gupta R.K., Harrison E.M., Ho A., Docherty A.B., et al. (2021) Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 9(4), 349-359.
4. Campbell L., Enbergs F.H. and Kenny G.N.C. (2001) CPD Anaesthesia, 3(3), 109-119.
5. Cattai A., Rabbozzi R., Natale V. and Franki P. (2015) Vet Anaesth Analg., 42, 93-98.
6. Bennett R.A., Schumacher J., Hedjazi-Haring K. and Newell S.M. (1998) J.Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 212(1), 93-98.
7. Klc N. and Erhardt W. (2004) Turk Veterinerlik ve Hayvanclk Dergis., 28(3), 603-607.
8. Ko J.C., Golder F.J., Mandsager R.E., Heaton-Jones T., et al. (1999) J.Am.Vet. Med., 215(9), 1292-6.
9. Silva A, Ribeiro L.M., Bressan N., Oliviera P., Ferreira D.A., et al. (2011) Res. Vet. Sci., 91, 278-280.
10. Henao-Guerrero N. and Ricco C.H. (2014) Am. J. Vet. Re., 75, 231-239.
11. Wang T., Raley-Susman K.M., Wang J., Chambers G., et al. (1999) Sroke, 30(11)2400-7.
12. Hall L.W., Clarke K.W. and Trim C.M. (2001) Veterinary Anaesthesia, 10th Ed, WB Saunders, Harcourt Publishers Ltd., London, 402-404.
13. Melesse D.Y., Denu Z.A., Kassahun H.G. and Agegnehu A.F. (2020) Int. J. Surg. Open., 22, 38-46.