R.H. PAIKRA1*, A.K. GHOSH2, P.R. MIRJHA3, P.M. KURREY4
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Agronomy, DKS College of Agriculture and Research station Bhatapara 493228, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492012, India
4Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : ramhari.bhu@gmail.com
Received : 01-12-2019 Accepted : 26-12-2019 Published : 30-12-2019
Volume : 11 Issue : 24 Pages : 9305 - 9307
Int J Agr Sci 11.24 (2019):9305-9307
Keywords : FYM, PGPR, PGPM, Azotobacter, Enzyme activity, Soil health
Academic Editor : Dr H. V. Pandya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
A field experiment was conducted at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh during the year 2008-09 in kharif and rabi season to see the effect of PGPR and FYM on growth with different doses of organic fertilizers on soil fertility status, soil health and enzymatic activity of rice-wheat cropping sequence. Significantly Effect the maximum and superior after one year of rice –wheat cropping sequence bulk density(1.25 Mg-3),water holding capacity(58 %),available nitrogen(246.69 kg/ha ), available potash (239.86 kg/ha ), and dehydrogenase activities (152.651), phoshphase activities (30.293) urease activities (4.491) use on kharif rice on treatment of 36 t FYM ha1 + and PGPM (Azotobactor + Azospirullum + Aspergillus + Tricoderma + PSB. and rabi wheat on treatment of 36 t /ha FYM with PGPR (Azotobactor + tricoderma) +PSB (P.flurescence + P.putida + B.megatera + B.polymyxa). The application of different treatment did not affect the pH, Ec, and bulk density decreased CEC significantly improved after rice- wheat sequence. Positive impact of soil fertility and enzymatic activity status recorded.
1. Rakshit A., Sarkar N.C. and Sen D. (2008) Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9(4), 629-634.
2. Chand S., Anwar M. and Patra D.D. (2006) Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37, 63-76.
3. Finck A. (1998) Annals of Arid Zone, 37, 1-24.
4. Mankotia B.S., Thakur R.C., Sanjay and Shekhar J. (2009) Himanchal Journal of Agriculture Research, 35(1), 17-20.
5. Zai Z.A., Muhhammad Arshad W.T. (2008) Advances in Agronomy, 81, 97-168.
6. Phogat S.B., Dahiya I.S., Hooda R.S., Sangwan N.K. and. Solanki Y.P.S. (2004) Annals of Biology, 20(2), 161-165.
7. Singh V.K., Sharma B.B., Dwevedi B.S. (2005) Journal of Agriculture Science, 139(4), 405-412.
8. Wen Yan Jun Zong, Gang Xio Xing Ji (2008) Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 16(1), 47-51.
9. Yunfu S., Eshghi S., Tafazoli E., Saba Y. (2008) J Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 16), 167-178.
10. Roy M. De, Chhonkar P.K., Patra A.K. (2006) Environment and Ecology, 24(1), 51-56.
11. Tang Yu Shu, Ci En Yan, Ting Mei Shen, Mixing Xing (2008) Actapadologica Sinica, 45(5), 1000-1006.