EFFECT OF FYM AND BIOINOCULANTS ON SOIL FERTILITY STATUS, SOIL HEALTH, AND ENZYMES ACTIVITES OF RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SEQUENCE UNDER RICE FIELD

R.H. PAIKRA1*, A.K. GHOSH2, P.R. MIRJHA3, P.M. KURREY4
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Agronomy, DKS College of Agriculture and Research station Bhatapara 493228, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492012, India
4Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : ramhari.bhu@gmail.com

Received : 01-12-2019     Accepted : 26-12-2019     Published : 30-12-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 24       Pages : 9305 - 9307
Int J Agr Sci 11.24 (2019):9305-9307

Keywords : FYM, PGPR, PGPM, Azotobacter, Enzyme activity, Soil health
Academic Editor : Dr H. V. Pandya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : PAIKRA, R.H., et al "EFFECT OF FYM AND BIOINOCULANTS ON SOIL FERTILITY STATUS, SOIL HEALTH, AND ENZYMES ACTIVITES OF RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SEQUENCE UNDER RICE FIELD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.24 (2019):9305-9307.

Cite - APA : PAIKRA, R.H., GHOSH, A.K., MIRJHA, P.R., KURREY, P.M. (2019). EFFECT OF FYM AND BIOINOCULANTS ON SOIL FERTILITY STATUS, SOIL HEALTH, AND ENZYMES ACTIVITES OF RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SEQUENCE UNDER RICE FIELD. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (24), 9305-9307.

Cite - Chicago : PAIKRA, R.H., A.K. GHOSH, P.R. MIRJHA, and P.M. KURREY. "EFFECT OF FYM AND BIOINOCULANTS ON SOIL FERTILITY STATUS, SOIL HEALTH, AND ENZYMES ACTIVITES OF RICE-WHEAT CROPPING SEQUENCE UNDER RICE FIELD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 24 (2019):9305-9307.

Copyright : © 2019, R.H. PAIKRA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh during the year 2008-09 in kharif and rabi season to see the effect of PGPR and FYM on growth with different doses of organic fertilizers on soil fertility status, soil health and enzymatic activity of rice-wheat cropping sequence. Significantly Effect the maximum and superior after one year of rice –wheat cropping sequence bulk density(1.25 Mg-3),water holding capacity(58 %),available nitrogen(246.69 kg/ha ), available potash (239.86 kg/ha ), and dehydrogenase activities (152.651), phoshphase activities (30.293) urease activities (4.491) use on kharif rice on treatment of 36 t FYM ha1 + and PGPM (Azotobactor + Azospirullum + Aspergillus + Tricoderma + PSB. and rabi wheat on treatment of 36 t /ha FYM with PGPR (Azotobactor + tricoderma) +PSB (P.flurescence + P.putida + B.megatera + B.polymyxa). The application of different treatment did not affect the pH, Ec, and bulk density decreased CEC significantly improved after rice- wheat sequence. Positive impact of soil fertility and enzymatic activity status recorded.

References

1. Rakshit A., Sarkar N.C. and Sen D. (2008) Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9(4), 629-634.
2. Chand S., Anwar M. and Patra D.D. (2006) Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 37, 63-76.
3. Finck A. (1998) Annals of Arid Zone, 37, 1-24.
4. Mankotia B.S., Thakur R.C., Sanjay and Shekhar J. (2009) Himanchal Journal of Agriculture Research, 35(1), 17-20.
5. Zai Z.A., Muhhammad Arshad W.T. (2008) Advances in Agronomy, 81, 97-168.
6. Phogat S.B., Dahiya I.S., Hooda R.S., Sangwan N.K. and. Solanki Y.P.S. (2004) Annals of Biology, 20(2), 161-165.
7. Singh V.K., Sharma B.B., Dwevedi B.S. (2005) Journal of Agriculture Science, 139(4), 405-412.
8. Wen Yan Jun Zong, Gang Xio Xing Ji (2008) Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 16(1), 47-51.
9. Yunfu S., Eshghi S., Tafazoli E., Saba Y. (2008) J Fruit Ornam. Plant Res., 16), 167-178.
10. Roy M. De, Chhonkar P.K., Patra A.K. (2006) Environment and Ecology, 24(1), 51-56.
11. Tang Yu Shu, Ci En Yan, Ting Mei Shen, Mixing Xing (2008) Actapadologica Sinica, 45(5), 1000-1006.