A.A. KEERTHIGA1, S.M. GOPAL2*, P.A. PRIYANKA3
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
2Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
3Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
* Corresponding Author : smuralgo@gmail.com
Received : 05-05-2019 Accepted : 26-05-2019 Published : 30-05-2019
Volume : 11 Issue : 10 Pages : 8441 - 8445
Int J Agr Sci 11.10 (2019):8441-8445
Keywords : Stationarity, Market Integration, Co-Integration, Short-Run Disequilibrium
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, Tamil Nadu.
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
Market integration in agricultural commodities is important for both developed and developing countries. If prices are not perfectly transmitted, then it may lead to mismatch and distortions in production and distribution. A sample of six domestic groundnut markets from the traditional groundnut growing states of Karnataka, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu were selected along with one major international groundnut market, namely Rotterdam market, Netherland. Analysis was carried out using the monthly price data between January 2000 and December 2018. Findings revealed that the prices became stationary only upon first differencing. The estimated error coefficients revealed that in Bijapur and Rotterdam markets disequilibrium got corrected within a month by changes in its own prices with speed of convergence at 20 and 76 per cent in the long-run path. But for other markets the speed of convergence ranged from 9 per cent to 69 per cent for short-run price movements to become stable along long-run equilibrium path in one or two-month lagged period.
1. Gopal S. Murali, Govindarajan K., Shanmugam T.R. and Raveendran N. (2008) Evaluating market and price integration among International Tea Markets, Productivity, 49(2-3), 117-125.
2. Jordan K.H. and Vansickle J.J. (1993) Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics, 27, 127-137.
3. Ghosh M. (2000) Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(4), 616-625.
4. Palaskas T.B. and Harriss White B. (1993) The Journal of Development Studies, 1, 1-57.
5. Davidson Russel and Mackinnon James (1993) Working Paper, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada.
6. Engle R.F. and Granger C.W.J. (1987) Econometrica, 55(12), 251-276.
7. Zanias G.P. (1993) Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44, 418-427.
8. Johansen Soren and Juselius K. (1990) Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
9. Schroeder T.C. and Goodwin B.K. (1990) Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 15, 111-122.
10. Mackinnon J.G. (1991) Readings in Co-integration, Oxford University Press, New York, U.S.A.
11. Selvi R., Pangayar Gopal, Murali S. and Swaminathan B. (2014) International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics & Statistics, 5 (2), 272-277.