ALONG ELEVATION PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF GROUND VEGETATION IN NATURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS OF CENTRAL HIMALAYAS

R.P. YADAV1*, B. GUPTA2, P.L. BHUTIA3, J.K. BISHT4, V.S. MEENA5, M. CHOUDHARY6
1Scientist, Crop Production Division, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, 263601, India
2Professor and Head, Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, College of Forestry, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, 173230, India
3Scientist ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, 500030, India
4Principal Scientist and Head, Crop Production Division, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, 263601, India
5Scientist, Crop Production Division, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, 263601, India
6Scientist, Crop Production Division, ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, 263601, India
* Corresponding Author : rams34052@gmail.com

Received : 08-08-2018     Accepted : 26-08-2018     Published : 30-08-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 16       Pages : 6930 - 6937
Int J Agr Sci 10.16 (2018):6930-6937

Keywords : Elevation, Grasslands, Himalayas, Land use systems, Silvipasture
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, 173230, Himachal Pradesh and Director, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, Almora, 263601, Uttarakhand for providing necessary support
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : YADAV, R.P., et al "ALONG ELEVATION PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF GROUND VEGETATION IN NATURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS OF CENTRAL HIMALAYAS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.16 (2018):6930-6937.

Cite - APA : YADAV, R.P., GUPTA, B., BHUTIA, P.L., BISHT, J.K., MEENA, V.S., CHOUDHARY, M. (2018). ALONG ELEVATION PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF GROUND VEGETATION IN NATURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS OF CENTRAL HIMALAYAS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (16), 6930-6937.

Cite - Chicago : YADAV, R.P., B. GUPTA, P.L. BHUTIA, J.K. BISHT, V.S. MEENA, and M. CHOUDHARY. "ALONG ELEVATION PHYTOSOCIOLOGY OF GROUND VEGETATION IN NATURAL LAND USE SYSTEMS OF CENTRAL HIMALAYAS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 16 (2018):6930-6937.

Copyright : © 2018, R.P. YADAV, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

In Himalayas people’s livelihood and economy are highly depended on natural land uses such as silvipastures and grasslands. In this study silvipastures viz., chir pine silvipasture (SPCP), mixed-forest silvipasture (SPM) and banjoak silvipasture (SPBO) and grasslands (Gr) in the 2B4D6-watershed of central Himalayas were investigated for phytosociology of ground vegetation i.e. herbage and shrubs along the elevation gradient. The whole 2B4D6-watershed was delineated into five elevations i.e., <1100 m, 1101-1400 m, 1401-1700 m, 1701-2000 m and >2000 m and six sites were selected at each elevation making a total of 30 sites. In the watershed six parcels of size 10 m x 10 m and six quadrats of size 50 × 50 cm were randomly laid out at each site to study shrubs and herbage vegetation in silvipastures and grasslands. Mean density and basal area of herbage was significantly higher in grasslands (989.6 tillers/m2 and 57.1 cm2/m2) as compared to silvipasture systems (889.3 tillers/m2 and 48.2 cm2/m2). Likewise, mean density and basal area of shrubs was significantly higher in grasslands (2452.2 plants/ha and 0.52 m2/ha) as compared to silvipasture systems (1646.5 plants/ha and 0.38 m2/ha). These parameters of ground vegetation decreased in both grasslands and silvipasture systems along the elevation. In silvipasture systems and grasslands the dominance of herbage species changed with elevation. This decreased density and basal area of ground vegetation in silvipastures as compared to grasslands and along elevation gradient can be related to altered climatic parameters. The present study could be useful for understanding the changes in the phytosociology of ground vegetation in different natural land use systems and along elevation dominated by chir pine, banjoak, mixed forest and grasses.

References

1. Korner C. (2007) Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(11), 569-574.
2. Paudel S. and Vetaas O.R. (2014) Journal of Mountain Science, 11(5), 1112-1122.
3. Pook E. and Moore C. (1966) Australian Journal of Botany, 14, 223-242.
4. Palni L.M.S., Maikuri R.K. and Rao K.S. (1998) Technical Paper-V in eco-regional cooperation for biodiversity conservation in the Himalaya, United Nation Development Programme, New York, 253-290.
5. Gairola S., Rawal R.S. and Todaria N.P. (2008) African Journal of Plant Science, 2, 42–48.
6. Borogayary B., Das A.K. and Nath A.J. (2018) Journal of Environmental Biology, 39, 67-71.
7. Jensen J. (2007) Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. 2nd Edn. Pearson Education, Noida.
8. Adhikari B.S., Joshi M., Rikhari H.C. and Rawat Y.S. (1992) Journal of Environmental Biology, 13(2), 101-105.
9. Tripathi D.K. and Kumar M. (2012) Journal of Human Ecology, 38(3), 207-212.
10. Raman R. and Punia M. (2012) Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 12(1), 1-12.
11. Rawat P.K., Tiwari P.C. and Pant C.C. (2011) International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 1(4), 678-699.
12. Mishra R. (1969) Ecology Work Book. Oxford and IBH Publications, Co., New Delhi.
13. Gupta B. and Sharma N. (2015) Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 31(2), 91-108.
14. Farooq A.B. (2012) Plant assemblages and their functional attributes along the altitude in sub humid sub temperate Himalaya. M.Sc. Thesis. Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India, 112.
15. Sharma N. (2012) GIS based land use planning for watershed management. Ph.D. Thesis, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni-Solan, (HP), India, 155.
16. Mahato D. (2013) Vegetation dynamics of chirpine forests along altitudinal gradient in Giri catchment of Himachal Pradesh. Ph.D Thesis. Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.), India. 247 p.
17. Prasad S., Uniyal P. and Chauhan D.S. (2015) Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 31(1), 7-13.
18. Gupta B., Sarvade S. and Mahmoud A. (2015) Range Management & Agroforestry, 36 (2), 156-163.
19. Zmarsly E, Kuttler W. and Pethe H. (2002) Meteorologisch-klimatologisches Grundwissen, Ulmer, equation 4.15.
20. Khurshid-Alam F.C. (1973) World Meteorological Organisation, 326, 290–306.
21. Klimes L. (2003) Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 317–328.
22. Luo T., Luo J. and Pan Y. (2005) Oecologia, 142: 261– 273.
23. Korner C. and Paulsen J. (2004) Journal of Biogeography, 31, 713–732.
24. Blumthaler M. (2007) Factors, trends and scenarios of UV radiation in arctic-alpine environments. In: Arctic alpine ecosystems and people in a changing environment (Eds.: J.B. Orbaek et al.). Springer, p. 181–193.
25. Wang C.T., Long R.J., Wang Q.J., Ding L.M. and Wang M.P. (2007) Australian Journal of Botany, 55, 110–117.
26. Rankin W.T. and Tramer E.J. (2002) Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 16-23.
27. Jelaska S.D., Antoni O., Bozic M., Krizan J. and Kusana V. (2006) Ecological Modelling, 194, 209-218.
28. Gupta B., Chauhan P.S. and Dass B. (2007) Indian Forester, 133(7), 997-1000.
29. Raturi G.P. (2012) Ecologia, 2, 76-84.
30. Singh, M. (2014) Pattern, composition and vegetation dynamics of agroforestry systems in Giri catchment, Himachal Pradesh. Ph. D. Thesis, Dr Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan–173230 (H.P.), India, 210.
31. Kumar M. and Bhatt V. (2006) Lyonia, 11(2), 43-59.
32. Sharma P., Rana J.C., Devi D., Randhawa S.S. and Kumar R. (2014) Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID 264878, 11.
33. Dar J.A. and Sundarapandian S. (2016) Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 9, 280-292.
34. Ram J., Kumar A. and Bhatt J. (2003) Plant biodiversity of Uttaranchal, Central Himalayan forests, India. Submitted to the XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Canada.
35. Kharkwal G. and Rawat Y.S. (2010) African Journal of Plant Science, 4(4), 116-121.
36. Sevgi O. and Tecimen H.B. (2008) Journal of Forest Science, 54, 306-313.
37. Hussain M.S., Sulatan A., Khan J.A. and Khan A. (2009) Tropical Ecology, 49(2), 167-181.
38. Yadava A.K. (1999) Advances in Forestry Research in India, 20, 70-85.
39. Hazra C.R. and Patil B.D. (1986) Indian Journal of Range Management, 7(1), 33-36.
40. Neufeld H.S. and Young D.R. (2003) Ecophysiology of the herbaceous layer in temperate deciduous forests. In: The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America (Eds.: F.S. Gilliam and M.R. Robert). Oxford University Press, New York, USA (2003).
41. Coll L., Gonzalez-Olabarria J.R., Mola-Yudego B., Pukkala T. and Messier C. (2011) European journal of Forest Resources, 130, 55-65.
42. Sah V.K. and Saxena A.K. (1990) Range Management and Agroforestry, 11(2), 115-121.
43. Srivastav M., Kumar A. and Hussain T. (2015) Check List, 11(4): 1702.
44. Negi B.S., Chauhan D.S. and Todaria N.P. (2008) Indian Journal of Forestry, 31(4), 585-593.
45. Rawal R.S. and Pangety Y.P.S. (1994) High altitude forests in a part of Kumaon in central Himalaya: Analysis along altitude gradient. Proceeding of Indian national Science Academy, B60, No. 6, p. 557-564.
46. Chandra J., Rawat V., Rawat Y.S. and Ram J. (2010) International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 2(1), 014-018 (2010).