VIJAY KAMATE1*, S. MOHAN KUMAR2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, SDM College of Engineering and Technology, Dharwad, Karnataka, 580002, India
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malnad College of Engineering, Hassan, Karnataka, 573202, India
* Corresponding Author : vijay.kamate@gmail.com
Received : 18-01-2018 Accepted : 26-01-2018 Published : 30-01-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 2 Pages : 5056 - 5060
Int J Agr Sci 10.2 (2018):5056-5060
Keywords : Maize, Sowing, Ergonomics, Digital Human Modeling (DHM), Virtual Ergonomics (VE), Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), RULA
Academic Editor : Dr K.N. Patil, Dr G.M. Gadad
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author are thankful to SDM College of Engineering and Technology, Dharwad, Karnataka, 580002, Visveswaraiah Technological University, Belgaum, 590018, Karnataka India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed
Role of ergonomics for sustainable development has become a hot subject in agriculture. To have higher agricultural yield it is essential to study not only basic requirements of agriculture but also human factors in design and in working environment. In this context, an effort has been done to study farmer’s postures who involve in growing maize in the traditional farming methods in their small holdings. In addition to scientific discipline, occupation theory, related principles, and novel method to design the sowing equipment in order to optimize human ergonomics, working efficiency and health has been investigated. Hence this present work is undertaken to study maize seed sowing posture of a farmer and ergonomics analysis in sowing process. In this present work, modern CAD techniques like digital human modeling (DHM) and virtual ergonomics (VE) were used to analyze the situation. It is concluded that newly designed proposed sowing equipment for farmers improves the working efficiency with reduced work related injuries.
1. Mahendra Dev S. (2011) Small Farmers in India: Challenges and Opportunities, Paper presented at Emerging Economies Research Dialogue” Beijing , China.
2. Tanvi Deshpande (2017) State of agriculture in India, PRS Legislative Research (PRS).
3. Yadav R., Tewari V.K. and Prasad. N. (1997) Applied Ergonomics, 28(1), 69-71.
4. Freivalds A. and Kim Y.J. (1990) Applied Ergonomics, 21(1), 39-42.
5. Thaneswer Patel and Sanjog J. (2013) Advanced Engineering Forum, 10, 16-21,
6. Kyle Dooley W. (2012) Ergonomics and the Development of Agricultural Vehicles, ASABE Distinguished Lecture Series No. 36.
7. Paul Windrum, Koen Frenken and Lawrence Green (2017) Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(6),953–971.
8. Meyers J.M., Miles J.A., Faucett J., Janowitz I., Tejeda T.G., Duraj V. et al., (2000) “High risk tasks for musculoskeletal disorders in agricultural field work”, Paper Presented at the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, San Diego, CA.
9. Meyers J.M., Miles J.A., Faucett J., Janowitz I., Tejeda T.G. and Kabashima J.N. (1997) Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 58(2), 121-126.
10. Meyers J.M., Miles J.A., Faucett J., Janowitz I., Tejeda T.G., Weber E. et al., (2001)J. Agromed, 8 (1), 37-52.
11. Dul J. and Neumann W.P. (2009) Applied Ergonomics, 40, 745-752.
12. Fadi A. Fathallah (2010) Applied Ergonomics, 41(2010), 738-743.
13. Saroj Gupta and Gyanpur S.R.N. (2012) Journal of Agricultural Technology, 8(3), 1089-1098.
14. Srinivas R.K. and Sivaramane N. (2013) Assessment of the maize situation, outlook and investment opportunities in India, Country Report 2013– Regional Assessment Asia (MAIZE-CRP), National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India.
15. Helander M.G. (1999) International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(1), 97-101.
16. Faraway J. and Reed M.P. (2007) Technometrics, 49(3), 277-290.
17. Lynn McAtamney and Nigel Corlett E. (1993) Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99.