PANNA LAL1, P.S. BADAL2, SANTOSH KUMAR3*
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh
2Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh
3ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur, 482004, Madhya Pradesh
* Corresponding Author : santosh.ageco@gmail.com
Received : 28-12-2017 Accepted : 09-01-2017 Published : 30-01-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 2 Pages : 4999 - 5001
Int J Agr Sci 10.2 (2018):4999-5001
Keywords : Natural resources, sustainability, water conservation, production, stability
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : This study forms the part Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Banaras Hindu University, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Varanasi by first author. The technical support provided by the co-authors
Author Contribution : Santosh Kumar- Critical revision of the article, final approval of the version to be published
This study explores of the Vindhyan region of the Uttar Pradesh was selected as it is highly prone to degradation of natural resources. Out of three districts namely Sonebhadra, Mirzapur and Varanasi which come under Vindhyan region, Mirzapur district was randomly selected as a representative district of the region. The farmer’s decision to adopt soil water conservation was analyzed with the help of Tobit Model. The Tobit model was estimated using the maximum likelihood procedure and only the most important explanatory variables were included in the model. The adoption of soil and water conservation shows that age (0.1760), family size (0.3639), farm size (0.9931), Source of Information about Market Information (0.1188), extension visit (.9031), training in natural resource management (0.903) and land tenure (0.3416) were significant. In Narayanpur block the level of diversification was higher in case of soil and water conservation adopters (0.33) as compared to non-adopters (0.25). Similar trend was observed in case of Pahari Block. Further production stability was also found higher in case of adopters of soil and water conservation measures as compared to non adopters in both the blocks.
1. Jones B. (2006) Community-based Natural Resource Management in Botswana and Namibia, Discussion IIED, UK.
2. FAO (1991) FAO/Netherlands Conference on Agriculture and Environment. S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, 15–19 April 1991.
3. Smith C.S., Mcdonald G.T. (1998) Journal of Environmental Management, 52, 10.1006/jema.1997.0162.
4. ODA (1995) Guidance Note on Indicators for Measuring and Assessing Primary Stakeholder Participation (July). London: Social Development Department, Overseas Development Administration.
5. Feder G., Just R.E. & Zilberman D. (1985) Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255– 98.
6. Rasul G., & Thapa G. B. (2003) Land Degradation & Development, 14, 495-508.
7. Bhandari B.S. and Grant M. (2004) farmers attitudes towards community based watershed management approaches and programmes: A case study in the Kalikhola watershed, Nepal, post doctoral study Report, University of Calgary, Canada.