ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT OAT (Avena sativa L.) VARIETIES

BHAWNA MEHTA1*, SUDESH JOOD2
1Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home-Science, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar, Haryana 125004
2Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home-Science, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar, Haryana 125004
* Corresponding Author : bhawna.mehtaa2013@gmail.com

Received : 30-11-2016     Accepted : 30-11-2016     Published : 18-06-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 28       Pages : 4366 - 4367
Int J Agr Sci 9.28 (2017):4366-4367

Keywords : Oat varieties, Antioxidants, in-vitro digestibility, Dietary fibre
Academic Editor : Dr Smritikana Sarkar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author are thankful to Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home-Science, CCS Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar, Haryana 125004
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : MEHTA, BHAWNA and JOOD, SUDESH "ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT OAT (Avena sativa L.) VARIETIES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9.28 (2017):4366-4367.

Cite - APA : MEHTA, BHAWNA, JOOD, SUDESH (2017). ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT OAT (Avena sativa L.) VARIETIES. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 9 (28), 4366-4367.

Cite - Chicago : MEHTA, BHAWNA and SUDESH, JOOD. "ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY AND NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT OAT (Avena sativa L.) VARIETIES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9, no. 28 (2017):4366-4367.

Copyright : © 2017, BHAWNA MEHTA and SUDESH JOOD, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Five oat varieties namely HJ-8, HFO-114, OS-6. OS-346 and Kent were examined for their antioxidant activity and nutritional properties. Among the studied varieties, variety OS-346 was shown to be a good source of total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity. This variety also exhibited highest amount of in vitro protein digestibility (63.53%), in vitro starch digestibility (52.63mg maltose released /g meal) and total dietary fibre as compared to other varieties

References

1. Ahmad M., Gul-Zaffar Z., Dar A. and Habib M. (2014) Journal of Scientific Research and Essays, 9, 52-59.
2. Anderson J.W., Baird P., Davis R.H., Ferreri S., Knudtson M., Koraym A., Waters V. and Williams C.L. (2009) Nutrition Reviews, 67,188-205.
3. AOAC. (2000) Approved Methods of Analysis. 16th Ed. Association of official Analytical Chemists. Arlyngton, Verginia, USA.
4. Furda I. (1981) Simultaneous analysis of soluble and insoluble dietary fibre. In W.P.T. James, and O. Theander (Eds.), The Analysis of Dietary Fibre in Food. Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 163-172.
5. Gujral H.S., Sharma P. and Singh R. (2011) LWT- Food Science and Technology, 44, 2223-2230.
6. Gupta S. and Brar J. (2015) International Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5,182-90.
7. Hatano T., Kagawa H., Yasuhara T. and Okuda T. (1988) Chemistry Pharmacology Bulletin, 36, 2090-2097.
8. Immerstrand T. (2010) Cholesterol-lowering properties of oats: Effects of processing and the role of oat components. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
9. Lahouar L., Arem A.E., Ghairi F., Chahdoura H., Salem H.B., Felah M.E. and Achour L. (2014)Food Chemistry, 145- 578-83.
10. Li Q. and Guo-Xu J. (2015) European Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3,49-57.
11. Maboodurrahman A. and Birari S.S. (2014) International Journal of Science Residency, 4, 793-796.
12. Mertz E.T., Kirleis A.W. and Aretell J.D. (1983) Fed. Proc. 32(5), 6029.
13. Padalino L., Mastromatteo M., Sepielli G. and Alessandro M. (2011) Open Access Materials, 4, 2119-2135.
14. Ryan D., Kendall M. and Robards K. (2007) Nutrition Research Reviews, 20, 147-162.
15. Sandhu K.S., Godara P., Kaur M. and Punia S. (2015) Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 6, 1-7.
16. Sharma V. and Chawla P. (2012) Journal of Dairying, Foods & Home-Science, 31, 112–116.
17. Sheoran O.P. and Pannu R.S. (1999) Statistical package for agricultural works. “O.P. Stat” Collage of Agriculture, Kaul, CCS HAU, Hisar. India.
18. Singh U., Khedekar M.S. and Jambunathan R. (1982) Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47, 510-516.
19. Singleton V.L. and Rossi J.A. (1965) American Journal of Enology Viticulture, 16,144-158.
20. Skoglund M., Peterson D.M., Andersson R., Nilsson J. and Dimberg L.H. (2008) Journal of Cereal Science, 48, 294-303.
21. Sterna V., Zute S. and Brunava L. (2016) Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 252-256.
22. Urbano G., Lopez T., Porres J.M., Gomez villalvaa E. and Frias J. (2005) Journal of Nutrition Science, 21, 230-39.
23. Usman S., Nazir S., Ali S., Nasreen Z. and Nazim A. (2010) Journal of Bangladesh Res. Publ. 4, 312-319.
24. Vijayakumar M., Chappalwar M., Dayanand, P., Bobde H. and Steffi M. (2013) International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (ESTIJ), 3, 677- 82.
25. Wani S. A., Shah T. R., Bazaria B., Nayika G.A., Gull A., Muzaffar K. and Kumar P. (2014) UJP. 3,14-20.
26. William D. (2008) European Journal of Gastrointestinal Hepatology, 20, 494-97.