PRISCILA LIRA DE MEDEIROS1, GUALTER GUENTHER COSTA DA SILVA2, ALEXANDRE SANTOS PIMENTA3*, ERMELINDA MARIA MOTA OLIVEIRA4, LEONARDO CASTELO DUARTE5
1Forest Sciences Graduate Program of the Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
2Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
3Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
4Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
5Forest Sciences Graduate Program of the Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
* Corresponding Author : aspimenta@ufrnet.br
Received : 11-11-2016 Accepted : 25-02-2017 Published : 06-03-2017
Volume : 9 Issue : 11 Pages : 4020 - 4025
Int J Agr Sci 9.11 (2017):4020-4025
Keywords : Neem, Soil Management, Silvicultural Performance, Fine Roots
Academic Editor : Neyton Miranda
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : To the group of soil studies of the Agricultural School of Jundiai
Author Contribution : Priscila Lira de Medeiros: Obtaining data; Analysis and interpretation of data; Writing of the manuscript; statistical analysis
Neem is an alternative for supplying firewood demand in the Brazilian semiarid, however there is few research on management for such species in the Northeast of Brazil. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and distribution of fine roots of neem under two farming methods. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with two treatments (methods A and B) and four replications, considering three depths (0–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm) and three sampling positions (row, between the row, and diagonal). Fine root samples were collected from selected trees. The samples were washed, scanned and data length and root surfaces were obtained. Analysis of experimental data showed for both methods that fine roots were concentrated in the first 20 cm of soil. The most significant difference was in the depth of 20-40 cm, where treatment B influenced the growth and distribution of fine roots.