PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY DYNAMICS OF PARCHING SORGHUM AS INFLUENCED BY SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON

A.B. AGE1*, S. SATPUTE2, G.S. LAHARIA3, D.S. KANKAL4, S.D. JADHAO5, G.V. THAKRE6, P.S. SOLUNKE7
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
3Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
4Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
5Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
6Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
7Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
* Corresponding Author : aageashok1@gmail.com

Received : 02-11-2021     Accepted : 27-11-2021     Published : 30-11-2021
Volume : 13     Issue : 11       Pages : 10943 - 10946
Int J Agr Sci 13.11 (2021):10943-10946

Keywords : Iron, Soil application, Foliar application, Productivity, Quality
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Sorghum Research Center, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : AGE, A.B., et al "PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY DYNAMICS OF PARCHING SORGHUM AS INFLUENCED BY SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 13.11 (2021):10943-10946.

Cite - APA : AGE, A.B., SATPUTE, S., LAHARIA, G.S., KANKAL, D.S., JADHAO, S.D., THAKRE, G.V., SOLUNKE, P.S. (2021). PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY DYNAMICS OF PARCHING SORGHUM AS INFLUENCED BY SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 13 (11), 10943-10946.

Cite - Chicago : AGE, A.B., S. SATPUTE, G.S. LAHARIA, D.S. KANKAL, S.D. JADHAO, G.V. THAKRE, and P.S. SOLUNKE. "PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY DYNAMICS OF PARCHING SORGHUM AS INFLUENCED BY SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 13, no. 11 (2021):10943-10946.

Copyright : © 2021, A.B. AGE, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in the research field of Sorghum Research Unit, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola during Kharif season of 2020-21. The experiment was laid in Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with twelve treatments in three replications. The treatments Factor-A as containing four levels of soil application of FeSO4 and Factor-B consist three levels of foliar application of FeSO4. The variety of parching sorghum was PKV-Kartiki. The recommended dose of fertilizer i.e., 80:40:40 N, P2O5 and K2O kg ha-1 were applied common to all treatments. The results revealed that the green grain (hurda) yield, green fodder yield, oven dry parching grain yield, leaf-stem yield, root yield and panicle straw yield were recorded significantly highest with soil application of 30 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and with the foliar application of 1.0% FeSO4 at flowering stage which were found to be at par with treatment of soil application of 20 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and with the foliar application 0.5% FeSO4 at flowering stage respectively. The reducing sugar, non-reducing sugar, total sugar, crude fiber, ash content, fat content and protein content of parching grain were found significantly highest with the soil application of 30 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and with the foliar application of 1.0% FeSO4 at flowering stage which were found at par with the soil application of 20 kg FeSO4 ha-1 and with the foliar application of 0.5% FeSO4 at flowering stage respectively

References

1. Shobha V., Kasturiba B., Naik R.K. and Yenagi N. (2008) Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 20, 586-588.
2. Chavan U.D., Patil J.V. and Shinde M.S. (2009) Indosian Journal of Agriculture Science, 10, 80-87.
3. Bhalerao R.S. (1999) M.Sc. Thesis, Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, 444 104, Maharashtra, India.
4. Tandon (1995) In, Proc. Int. Potash Inst. Colloq. Potassium in Asia, Balanced fertilization to increase and sustain agriculture production. Chiang Mai Thailand IPL, Basel, pp. 43-72.
5. Wankhade S.G., Dakhaore R.C., Wanjari S.S., Patil D.B., Patdukhe N.R. and Jgole R.W.(1996) Indian Jr of Agriculture Research, 30, 164-168.
6. Krishnasamy R. and Mathan K.K. (1999) Madras Agriculture Journal, 86, 657-658.
7. Mali A.L. and Dashora L.N. (2003) Annals of Agricultural Research News series, 24, 421-422.
8. Wanjari S.S., Deshmukh J.P., Atale S.B. and Wankhade S.G.(2003) Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth research Journal, 27, 43-48.
9. Verma S.S., Singh N., Joshi Y.P. and Deorari V. (2005) Indian J. of Agron, 50(7), 167-169.
10. Mortvedt J. (2000) National Fertilizer and Environmental Research, 5-9.
11. Pulschen L. (2004) IFA International Symposium on Micronutrients New Delhi, 34-42.
12. Yawalkar K.S., Agarwal J.P. and Bokade S. (1996) Manure and fertilizers. Agri -Horticulture Publishing House, Nagpur, 244-245.
13. Maynard A.J., (Ed) (1970) Methods in Food Analysis Academic Press New York, 176.
14. A.O.A.C. (1965) Official method of analysis. 12th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Washington D.C.
15. Miller G.L. (1972) Anal. Chem., 31, 426.
16. Hodge J.E. and Hofreiter B.T. (1962) Determination of reducing sugars and carbohydrates. In, Whistler, R.L. and Wolfrom, M.L., Eds., Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Academic Press, New York, 380-394.
17. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research Jhon wiley and sons, Newyork.
18. Zairian A.H. and Malakouti M.J. (2001) In Plant Nutrition, Springer, Netherlands, 92, 840-841.
19. Amanullah M. M., Alagesan A., Pazhnivelan S. and Vaiyapuri K. (2007) Crop Research-Hissar, 33, 62-64.
20. Singh H., Singh P. and Sumeriya H.K. (2008) International J. of tropical Agriculture, 26(3-4), 417-419.
21. Kagne S.V., Bavalgave V.G., Waghmare M.S. and Bodake B.L. (2008) An Asian J. Soil Sci., 3(2), 313-315.
22. Romheld V. and Marschner H. (1991) Functions of micronutrients in plants. In, Mortvedt JJ, Cox FR, Shuman LM, Welch RM (Ed). Micronutrients in Agriculture (pp. 297-328), 2ed no. 4 in the Soil Science Society of America Book Series. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
23. Ananda N. and Patil B.N. (2005) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 18(3), 599-603.
24. Pawar A., Adsul P.B. and Gaikwad G.K. (2015) Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and development, 30(2), 74-83.
25. Hadson A.S., Holland J.F. and Rogers E.F. (1992) Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 43(3), 635-644.
26. Jokar L. and Ronaghi A. (2015) Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions-Isfahan University of Technology, 6(2), 163-174.
27. Prasad P.V.V., Satyanarayana V., Sotdar M.V. and Crufurd P.Q. (2000) Journal of Plant Nutrition, 23(10), 1471-1483.
28. Sahrawat K.L., Rego T.J., Rahman M.H. and Rao J.K. (1998) J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 46(1), 58-60.
29. Whitty E.N. and Chambliss C.G. (2005) Fertilization of Field and Forage Crops. Nevada State University Publication, 21.