D. MOUNIKA1*, M. MARTIN LUTHER2, K. CHANDRA SEKHAR3, G. KISHORE BABU4, K. JAYA LALITHA5
1Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla, 522101, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, 522034, Andhra Pradesh, India
2Professor, Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla, 522101, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, 522034, Andhra Pradesh, India
3Professor & Head, Department of Agronomy (Water Management), Advanced Post Graduate Centre, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, 522034, India
4Principal Scientist & Head, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, 522034, India
5Professor & Head, Department of Crop Physiology, Agricultural College, Bapatla, 522101, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, 522034, India
* Corresponding Author : dmounika358@yahoo.in
Received : 02-04-2020 Accepted : 18-04-2020 Published : 30-04-2020
Volume : 12 Issue : 8 Pages : 9725 - 9730
Int J Agr Sci 12.8 (2020):9725-9730
Keywords : Rice, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, Uptake, STCR
Academic Editor : Kalaivanan D., Dr T. Kumareswari
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Agronomy, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Lam, Guntur, 522034, Andhra Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural College farm, Bapatla, during kharif and rabi 2017-18 and 2018-19. The experiment was conducted with variety BPT-5204 in a Randomized Block Design with ten treatments and three replications. Uptake and content of N, P and K in grain and straw at harvest were found significantly higher with the treatments that received soil test-based fertilizer recommendation with 10 t ha-1 FYM application, followed by soil test-based fertilizer recommendation (T2). Fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) was significantly the highest with application of 5.5 t ha-1 target yield recommendation with FYM (T8) compared to all other treatments. Grain yield of rice was significantly higher with soil test-based fertilizer recommendation with 10 t ha-1 FYM application which was statistically at par with soil test-based fertilizer recommendation alone (T2) and 7.5 t ha-1 targeted yield fertilizer recommendation with FYM (T10) compared to the rest of the treatments.
1. Anonymous (2018) Report on area, production and productivity of rice. Ministry of Agriculture, Govt of India.
2. Anonymous (2007) Soil test-based fertilizer application. All India Coordinated Research Project for Investigations on Soil Test Crop Response Correlation (AICRP) Hyderabad Centre, Indian council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, ANGRAU, Hyderabad and Department of Agriculture, A.P., 60.
3. Kabat B., Panda D., Chakravorti S.P., Samuntaray R.N. and Sahu N. (2006) Oryza, 43 (2), 105-111.
4. Yadav B., Kumar R., Khamparia R.S. and Kumar A. (2015) International Journal of Agriculture & Environment and Biotechnology, 8(3),659-667.
5. Vetrivel M., Bagavathi Ammal U., Sankar R., Coumaravael K., Ayyoob K.C. and Dey P. (2017) International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 6(3), 538-541.
6. Satheesh N. and Balasubramanian N. (2003) Madras Agricultural Journal, 90 (1-3), 41-46.
7. Ray P.K., Jana A.K., Maitra D.N., Saha M.N., Chaudhury J., Saha S. and Saha A.R. (2000) Journal of Indian Society Soil Science, 48, 79-84.
8. Ahmed S., Riazuddin M. and Krishna Reddy P.V. (2002) Agropedology, 12, 133-140.
9. Santhi R., Bhaskaran A., Poongothai S., Maragatham S., Natesan R., Sellamuthu K.M. (2010) Decision Support System for Integrated Fertiliser prescriptions, Computer software, Department of Soil Science & Agriculture Chemistry, TNAU, Coimbatore.
10. Bera R., Seal A., Bhattacharyya P., Das T.H., Sarkar D., Kangjoo K. (2006) Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 7(12),963-968.
11. Sharma G.K., Mishra V.N., Maruti Sankar G.R., Patil S.K., Srivastav L.K., Thakur D.S. and Srinivasa Rao C.H. (2015) Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 46,2177-2190.
12. Ahmad R. and Krishna Reddy P.V. (2002) Agropedology, 12,133-140.