EVALUATION OF FISHERIES BASED INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS IN MID HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND

V.K. SINGH1*, K.S. MEHTA2, R.S. CHAUHAN3
1Associate Director, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lohaghat, 262524, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, 263143, Uttarakhand, India
2General Manager, Samak Aquaculture, Rudrapur, Uttarakhand, India
3Professor & Head, Department of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, 263143, Uttarakhand, India
* Corresponding Author : drvkskvk@gmail.com

Received : 30-08-2019     Accepted : 13-09-2019     Published : 15-09-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 17       Pages : 9000 - 9003
Int J Agr Sci 11.17 (2019):9000-9003

Keywords : Fish-poultry, Fsh-vegetable, Fish-crop integration, Composite fish farming, Hill aquaculture
Academic Editor : Dr Raghvendra Singh, Dr Ajeet Singh
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Biotechnology, Govt of India, New Delhi for funding the project No. BT/PR12777/SPD/24/385/2009. Authors are also thankful to Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lohaghat, 262524, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, 263143, Uttarakhand, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SINGH, V.K., et al "EVALUATION OF FISHERIES BASED INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS IN MID HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.17 (2019):9000-9003.

Cite - APA : SINGH, V.K., MEHTA, K.S., CHAUHAN, R.S. (2019). EVALUATION OF FISHERIES BASED INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS IN MID HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND . International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (17), 9000-9003.

Cite - Chicago : SINGH, V.K., K.S. MEHTA, and R.S. CHAUHAN. "EVALUATION OF FISHERIES BASED INTEGRATED FARMING SYSTEMS IN MID HILLS OF UTTARAKHAND ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 17 (2019):9000-9003.

Copyright : © 2019, V.K. SINGH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Trials were conducted to evaluate different fisheries based integrated systems viz., fish-poultry, fish-vegetable, fish-crop farming and compared with composite fish farming at farmers’ fields in mid hill conditions of Uttarakhand. In composite fish farming, fish seed (10-20 cm size) of silver carp, grass carp and common carp varieties were stocked in combination of 30:40:30, respectively at density of 300 no./100 m2 in the month of February. In fish-poultry integration, along with fish farming, two crops of poultry chicks (var.- Cari Devendra), 25 number in each crop, in a year were reared. In fish-vegetable integration, two crops of vegetables namely Capsicum (variety- California wonder) followed by second crop of cauliflower (variety- Snow crown) were grown in 200 m2 area plots adjacent to fish ponds. In fish-crop integration, two crops of cereal viz., soybean (var.- PS 1092) from June to October and wheat (var.- UP 2572) from October to May were cultivated in 200 m2 area adjacent to fish ponds. Results showed that fish production was ranged between 59.80-65.49 kg/100 m2 with maximum recorded in fish-poultry integration. Besides fish, additional food in the form of poultry meat (77.35 kg), vegetables (capsicum- 218 kg and cauliflower- 380 kg) and cereals (soybean- 17.6 kg and wheat- 32.5 kg) were also produced in different integrated systems. Economic analysis revealed maximum income in fish-poultry integrated farming (Rs 24164.20) followed by fish-vegetable (Rs 19006.40) as compared to fish-crop (Rs 11859.40) and composite fish farming (Rs 11041.20). Fish-poultry integrated farming also received maximum income over the investment cost with B:C ratio of 3.54 followed by fish-vegetable system (3.43) as compared to composite fish farming (2.76). It is concluded that fish-poultry followed by fish-vegetable integrated farming systems are found to be most suitable for mid hill conditions of Uttarakhand in terms of production as well as profit and also ensures nutritional security of rural people.

References

1. Kandpal K. (2013) Agropedia.iitk.ac.in, 21.05.2013, 15.15.
2. Taneja U. (2013) Agricultural profile of Uttarakhand. Agricultural Economics Research Centre, University of Delhi, January 2013, 32.
3. Sasikala V., Tiwari R. and Saravanan M. (2015) J. Int. Acad. Res. for Multidisciplinary, 3(2), 319-328.
4. Panke S.K., Kadam R.P. and Nakhate C.S. (2010) In: 22nd Nat. Sem. “Role of Extension in Integrated Farming Systems for sustainable rural livelihood”, 9-10th Dec., Maharashtra, 33-35.
5. Tomar S.P., Sairam R.K., Harika A.S. and Ganguly T.K. (1982) Forage Research, 8, 93-98.
6. Singh K.P., Singh S.N., Kumar H., Kadian V.S. and Saxena, K.K. (1993) Haryana J. Agronomy, 9, 122-125.
7. Singh S.N., Saxena K.K., Singh K.P. Kumar H. and Kadian V.S. (1997) Annals of Agricul. Res., 18(3), 340-43.
8. Jayanthi C., Rangaswamy A., Chinnusammy C., Purushothaman S and Planiappam S.P. (1994) Indian J. Agronomy, 39, 1-7.
9. Laxmi, Gupta N., Singh M. and Sharma R.P. (2015) Current World Environment, 10(2), 667-671.
10. Nageswaran M., Selvaganapathy E., Subbiah V.R. and Nair S. (2009) In: Report of M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, Chennai, 16-53.
11. Radhamani S., Balasubramanian A., Ramamoorthy K. and Geethalakshmi V. (2003) Agricultural Reviews, 24, 204-210.
12. Sharma S.K., Nainwal G.C., Kumar P and Ujjania N.C. (2016) Progressive Research- An International Journal,11 (Special-I),411-414.
13. Vass K.K. (2002) In: Proc. Nat. Sem. Aquatic Resource Management in hills, NRCCWF, Bhimtal, 198-216.
14. Singh V.K., Mehta, K.S., Singh Ajay K. and Singh Awani K. (2014) Int. J. Basic and Applied Agric. Research, 12(3), 425-430.
15. Bahera U.K., Jha K.P. and Mahapatra I.C. (2004) Crop Research, 27(1), 83-89.
16. Tugie D. Abebe A. and Endebu M. (2017) Int. J. Fish. Aquatic Studies, 5(4), 377-382.
17. Getu D., Amare F., Barhanu T., Kinfo H. and Tefere T. (2017) Advance Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Discoveries, 170.0, c-5, 20-27.
18. Kalita G., Ahmad F.A., Bora I., Buragohain R., Sarma K., Rahman, Kalita A. and Nongthombam J. (2016) CAU Farm Magazine, 6, 4-11.
19. Kochewad S.A., Meena L.K., Singh S.P. and Singh K. (2017) South Asian J. Food Technol. Environ., 3(1), 526-532.
20. Prinsloo J.F., Schoonbee H.J. and Theron J. (1999) Water SA, 25(2), 231-238
21. Chen Y. (1981) Chicken farming, In: Integrated farming, Vol. II, Regional Aquaculture Lead Centre, Wuxi, China.
22. Devaraj K.V. and Keshavappa G.Y. (1980) In: Proc. Sem. some aspects of Inland Aquaculture in Karnataka, 1-7.
23. Njoku D.C. and Ejiogu C.O. (1999) Aquaculture Research, 30, 399-408.
24. Sahoo U.K. and Singh S.L. (2015) Int. J. Agric. and Forestry, 5, 281-286.
25. Bezbaruah P. (2012) In: Book of extended summaries, The National seminar on livelihood options for small and marginal farmers in fragile ecosystems, ICAR Research Complex for NEG region, Umaim, Meghalaya.
26. Jagadeeshwara K., Nagaraju Y., Bhagyavathi and Nagaraju K. (2011) Livelihood improvement of vulnerable farmers through integrated farming systems of southern Karnataka, 145-146.
27. Pillay T.V.R. (1990) Aquaculture principles and practices, Fishing News Book, London, 526-542.
28. Gangwar L.S., Saran S. and Sarvesh K. (2013) Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26, 181-188.
29. Tripathi H., Tomar, S.S., Pandey R., Solanki V.S., Singh R., Meena K.L., Tomar M. and Adhikari D.S. (2010) In: 22nd Nat. Sem. “Role of Extension in Integrated Farming Systems for sustainable rural livelihood”, 9-10th Dec., Maharashtra, 42-43.
30. Chinnabasavanna A.S., Biradar D.P., Prabhudev K.N. and Mahabhaleswar H. (2009) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22(1),25-27.