DISSIPATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF THIAMETHOXAM 12.6% + LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN 9.5% ZC IN TOMATO

A. SENSON1*, A. PAUL2, N. ANITHA3, V.S. AMRITHA4, M.S. NISHA5, A. VISWANATHAN6
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
2Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
3Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
4Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
5Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
6Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agriculture University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
* Corresponding Author : aurasenson@gmail.com

Received : 15-07-2019     Accepted : 26-07-2019     Published : 30-07-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 14       Pages : 8797 - 8799
Int J Agr Sci 11.14 (2019):8797-8799

Keywords : Dissipation, Risk Assessment, Half-Life, Thiamethoxam, Lambda Cyhalothrin
Academic Editor : Seher Dirican, Dr Parvati Sharma
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Pesticide Residues Research and Analytical laboratory, College of Agriculture, Vellayani and Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, 695522, Kerala, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SENSON, A., et al "DISSIPATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF THIAMETHOXAM 12.6% + LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN 9.5% ZC IN TOMATO." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.14 (2019):8797-8799.

Cite - APA : SENSON, A., PAUL, A., ANITHA, N., AMRITHA, V.S., NISHA, M.S., VISWANATHAN, A. (2019). DISSIPATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF THIAMETHOXAM 12.6% + LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN 9.5% ZC IN TOMATO. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (14), 8797-8799.

Cite - Chicago : SENSON, A., A. PAUL, N. ANITHA, V.S. AMRITHA, M.S. NISHA, and A. VISWANATHAN. "DISSIPATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF THIAMETHOXAM 12.6% + LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN 9.5% ZC IN TOMATO." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 14 (2019):8797-8799.

Copyright : © 2019, A. SENSON, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Kalliyoor panchayat to determine the persistence and dissipation of the insecticide mixture thiamethoxam 12.6% + lambda cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC @ 33+15.75 g a.i ha-1 in tomato. The mean initial deposit of thiamethoxam and lambda cyhalothrin were 0.07 and 0.06 mg kg-1 and both reached the limit of quantification three days after spraying with half –lives 4.05 and 3.42 days respectively. Risk assessment studies using the dissipation data ensured the safety of the insecticide mixture sprayed product to the consumer. The residue analysis was carried out by LC- MS/MS and GC-ECD.

References

1. Government of India, (2018) Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers’ Welfare Horticulture Statistics Division, 490.
2. Saikia D.K., Borkakati R.N. (2019) Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(1), 986-988.
3. Kelageri S. S., Rao C. S, Bhushan V. S., Reddy P. N. (2017) Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies,5(6), 1966-1970.
4. IRAC [Insecticide Resistance Action committee] (2018) IRAC home page.
5. KAU (Kerala Agricultural University) (2016) Package of Practices Recommendations, Crops 15th Ed. Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 392.
6. Sharma K. K. (2013) Pesticide residue analysis manual. Indian council of agricultural research. New Delhi, 96.
7. Varghese T. S., Mathew T. B., Thomas George T., Beevi S. N., Xavier G. (2011) Pesticide Research Journal, 23(2), 135-139.
8. NSSO. (2014) Household consumption of various goods and services in India 2011-2012, NSS 68th Round, National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of statistics and Programme implementation, government of India.
9. Kumar S.V., Subhashchandran K.P., George T., Suryamol S. (2018) Pesticide Research Journal, 30(2),174-182.
10. WHO-JMPR. (2018) Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues, Report, 668.
11. Barik S.R., Ganguly P., Kunda S.K., Kole R.K., Bhattacharyya A. (2010) Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 85, 419-422.
12. Hampaiah J. (2018) MSc thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 99.