DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COCONUT MILK EXTRACTOR

L. MOHAN1*, ANAND TITO2
1Department of Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology, Thanjavur, 613005, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
2Department of Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology, Thanjavur, 613005, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
* Corresponding Author : mohanlenin1994@gmail.com

Received : 03-06-2019     Accepted : 25-06-2019     Published : 30-06-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 12       Pages : 8650 - 8655
Int J Agr Sci 11.12 (2019):8650-8655

Keywords : Coconut milk, Extraction, Design and development, Efficiency, Yield, Nozzle clearance, Rotational speed
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology, Thanjavur, 613005, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : MOHAN, L. and TITO, ANAND "DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COCONUT MILK EXTRACTOR." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.12 (2019):8650-8655.

Cite - APA : MOHAN, L., TITO, ANAND (2019). DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COCONUT MILK EXTRACTOR. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (12), 8650-8655.

Cite - Chicago : MOHAN, L. and ANAND, TITO. "DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COCONUT MILK EXTRACTOR." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 12 (2019):8650-8655.

Copyright : © 2019, L. MOHAN and ANAND TITO, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A machine was designed and developed for coconut milk extraction and its performance was evaluated at IIFPT, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu. The milk extraction efficiency was found to be 78.27%. The milk yield was tested with three different nozzle clearance of 2, 3, 4 mm and rotational speeds of 40, 50 and 60 rpm. Finding saying that, the percentage of coconut milk yield was higher at the point of combination of the nozzle clearance of 2 mm with the rotational speed of 40 rpm which yielded about 49.03% of coconut milk. The lowest coconut milk yield of 33.38% was analyzed during the point of combination of the nozzle clearance of 4 mm with the rotational speed of 60 rpm. Both lower and higher percentage of coconut milk yield were having a significant difference (p<0.05) with other results. The experiment shows that the increase in rotational speed of the motor resulted in decrease in the milk yield. It was also showing that the average milk yield started to decrease while increasing the nozzle clearance (mm). Thus, our major research finding saying that, lower rotational speed and nozzle clearance result to the higher amount of coconut milk yield. The performance evaluation indicates the values of 30.52 kg/h and 0.041kWh/kg-grated coconut for average feed rate (FR) and Specific energy consumption (SEC) for the designed coconut milk extractor.

References

1. Bako T., Awulu J.O. and Garba A.J. (2017) American Journal of Modern Energy, 3(6), 136-145.
2. Beerens P. (2007) Eindhoven University of Technology. Ministerio de Ambientey Energía MINAE (2007) “Plan Nacional de Biocombustibles”. Costa Rica.
3. Eric O., Franklin D.J. and Holbrook L.H. (1982) Machinery handbook (21ed.). New York.
4. Evangelista R.L. (2009) Industrial Crops and Products, 29(1), 189-196.
5. Evangelista R.L. and Cermak S.C. (2007) Journal of American Oil Chemists' Society, 84, 1169-1175.
6. Ezeoha S., Akubuo C., Odigboh E. and Arallo M. (2017) Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(2), 636-642.
7. Harmanto A., Hendriadi E., Rahmarestia M. and Wiyono J. (2009) Indonesian Journal of Agriculture, 2(1), 35-40.
8. Karaj S. and Müller J. (2011) Industrial Crops and Products, 34(1), 1010-1016.
9. Khan L. and Hanna M. (1983) Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 28(6), 495-503.
10. Khurmi R.S. and Gupta J.K. (2008) A textbook of machine design (6 ed.). New Delhi.
11. Olayanju T. (2003) Trop. Sci., 43, 181-183.
12. Pallant, J. (2005) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version. In: Allen & Unwin Pty, crow’s Nest, Australia.
13. Punchihewa P. and Arancon R. (2006) Coconut: Post harvest operations. Asian and Pacific Coconut Community.
14. Santoso U., Kazuhiro K., Ota T., Tadokorob T. and Maekawab A. (1996) Food Chemistry, 57(2), 299-304.
15. Vadke V.S. and Sosulski F. (1988) Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 65(7), 1169-1176.
16. Yan D., Kovacevic A., Tang Q., Rane S. and Zhang W. (2017) Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 231(24), 4617-4634.
17. Zehev Tadmor, Costas G. Gogos (2006) Principles of Polymer Processing. Hoboken, New Jersey, ISBN: 978-0-471-38770-1.