PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT WEEDICIDE TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TRANSPLANTED FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) UNDER LATERITIC SOIL OF KONKAN

K.D. VARNEKAR1, V.G. MORE2, A.S. POL3*, A.P. CHAVAN4, V.A. RAJEMAHADIK5
1Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
2Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
3Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
4Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
5Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
* Corresponding Author : amitspol93@gmail.com

Received : 02-04-2019     Accepted : 27-04-2019     Published : 30-04-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 8       Pages : 8277 - 8280
Int J Agr Sci 11.8 (2019):8277-8280

Keywords : Finger millet, Weed management, Herbicide, Growth and yield
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Dr Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, 415712, Maharashtra, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : VARNEKAR, K.D., et al "PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT WEEDICIDE TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TRANSPLANTED FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) UNDER LATERITIC SOIL OF KONKAN." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.8 (2019):8277-8280.

Cite - APA : VARNEKAR, K.D., MORE, V.G., POL, A.S., CHAVAN, A.P., RAJEMAHADIK, V.A. (2019). PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT WEEDICIDE TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TRANSPLANTED FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) UNDER LATERITIC SOIL OF KONKAN. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (8), 8277-8280.

Cite - Chicago : VARNEKAR, K.D., V.G. MORE, A.S. POL, A.P. CHAVAN, and V.A. RAJEMAHADIK. "PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT WEEDICIDE TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TRANSPLANTED FINGER MILLET (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) UNDER LATERITIC SOIL OF KONKAN." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 8 (2019):8277-8280.

Copyright : © 2019, K.D. VARNEKAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The present investigation conducted out at Agronomy Farm, College of Agriculture, Dapoli, Dist.Ratnagiri (M.S.) during kharif 2017. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design. There were ten treatments replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of oxyflourfen (PE) (T1), oxadiargyl (PE) (T2), oxyflourfen (PE) fb HW at 30 DAT (T3), oxadiargyl (PE) fb HW at 30 DAT (T4), oxyflourfen (PE) fb bispyribac sodium (POE) (T5), oxadiargyl (PE) fb bispyribac sodium(POE) (T6), oxyflourfen (PE) fb metasulfuron methyl + chlorimuron-ethyl (POE) (T7), oxadiargyl (PE) fb metasulfuron-methyl + chlorimuron-ethyl (POE) at 25 DAT (T8), Weed free check (T9), unweeded check (T10). The soil of experimental plot was sandy clay loam in texture, acidic in pH and medium in organic carbon content. It was low in available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and available potassium. The soil was levelled, well drained and uniform in depth. During the course of present investigation, periodical growth observations, yield contributing characters and yield were recorded to evaluate the treatment effects. Results revealed that among all the treatments, treatment weed free check and among weedicide treatments, treatment oxyflourfen (PE) @ 0.1 kg a.i. ha-1 fb HW at 30 DAT produced higher growth, yield attributes and yield as compared to rest of the treatments under study.

References

1. Anonymous (2013) Annual Report (All India Co-ordinated Small Millets Improvement Project). GKVK Campus, UAS, Bangalore, 15-18.
2. Anonymous (2013) Government of India, www.indiastat.com
3. Anonymous (2017) Final estimates of area, production & productivity of principle crops during 2016-17 in M. S. Department of agriculture, Government of Maharashtra.
4. Pragya S and Rita Singh R. (2012) African Journal of Food Science, 6(4), 77-84.
5. Stanly M. J. and Shanmugam A. (2013) Financial Services and Management Research, 2(4), 49-58.
6. Lakshmi N.V., Hanumantha Rao Y. and Chandrasekhar K. (2006) The Andhra Agric. Journal, 53, 8-9.
7. Sah A., Ansari A.M., and Ahmad E. (2012) Progressive Agriculture, 2012 12(2), 337-343.
8. Ganie Z.A., Singh S. and Singh S. (2013) Indian Journal Agron, 58(1), 125-126.
9. Murthy K.V.R., Reddy D.S. and Reddy G.P. (2012) Indian Journal of Weed Science, 44(2), 70–76.
10. Pradhan A., Rajput A. S. and Thakur A. (2010) Indian Journal of Weed Science, 42(1&2), 53-56.
11. Kumara O., Basavaraj Naik T. and Palaiah P. (2007) Karnataka Journal of Agric. Science, 20(2), 230-233.
12. Prithvi B., Krishna, Rao A. S. and Srinivasulu K. (2015) Indian Journal of Weed Science, 47(2), 214-215.
13. Prajapati B.L., Upadhyay V.B. and Singh R.P. (2007) Indian Journal of Agron., 52(1), 67-69.
14. Nyende P., Tenywa J.S., Oryokot J. and Kidoido M. (2001) African Crop Science Journal, 9(3), 507-516.
15. Seetharam A. and Krishne Gowda K.T. (2007) UAS, GKVK, Bangalore, 1-9.