IMPACT ON LAND CONFIGURATION, INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND MULCH ON DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS IN MALWA PLATEAU IN MADHYA PRADESH

R. AMULE1*, S.K. CHOUDHARY2
1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture Indore, 450001, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
2Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture Indore, 450001, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : rani91hanwat@gmail.com

Received : 28-02-2019     Accepted : 12-03-2019     Published : 15-03-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 5       Pages : 7999 - 7801
Int J Agr Sci 11.5 (2019):7999-7801

Keywords : Conservation, Integrated nutrient management, Cropping systems Productivity
Academic Editor : Ramesh Amule
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to College of Agriculture Indore, 450001, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : AMULE, R. and CHOUDHARY, S.K. "IMPACT ON LAND CONFIGURATION, INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND MULCH ON DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS IN MALWA PLATEAU IN MADHYA PRADESH." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11.5 (2019):7999-7801.

Cite - APA : AMULE, R., CHOUDHARY, S.K. (2019). IMPACT ON LAND CONFIGURATION, INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND MULCH ON DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS IN MALWA PLATEAU IN MADHYA PRADESH. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 11 (5), 7999-7801.

Cite - Chicago : AMULE, R. and S.K., CHOUDHARY. "IMPACT ON LAND CONFIGURATION, INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND MULCH ON DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS IN MALWA PLATEAU IN MADHYA PRADESH." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11, no. 5 (2019):7999-7801.

Copyright : © 2019, R. AMULE and S.K. CHOUDHARY, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming, College of Agriculture Indore during the kharif season 2013-14 with the objective to find out the effect of land configuration, INM and mulch on growth and yield of different crops and cropping system and they’re after effect on economic viability of different treatment as well as find out the best treatment combination for higher yield. Experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replication and total thirty-two Treatment combination was done. The minimum tillage treatments were provided higher seed yield, Net return and B:C ratio as compare to conventional tillage. On the basis of result obtained from the experiment it concludes that optimal cropping system combination was (arhar + fodder sorghum) .as the higher net return & B:C ratio are concern better yield and higher growth may also obtained with 75 % RDF with 25 % vermi-compost and mulching. Highest productivity and profitability were found with the combination treatment T16 combination (minimum tillage + arhar and fodder sorghum intercropping system +75 % RDF with 25 % vermi-compost + mulch treatments).

References

1. Anonymous. (2011-12) Area and production in India and Madhya Pradesh. Ministry of Agriculture and Statistics, New Delhi.
2. Billore S.D., Ramesh A., Joshi O.P. and Vyas V.K. (2005) Soybean Research, 3,17-22.
3. Billore S.P., Vyas A.K. and Joshi O.P. (2009) Journal of Food Legumes, 22 (2), 124–26.
4. Balakrishnan N. and Duraisami V.P. (2013) Madras Agricultural Journal, 100(1/3),118-122.
5. Devi K.N., Singh T. B., Athokpom H.S, Singh N.B. and Shamurailatpam D. (2013) Australian journal of crop science, 7 (9),1407-1415.
6. Ewulo B.S., Ojeniyi S.O. and Morenikeji C.I. (2011) International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 1 (11), 485-490.
7. Kühling I., Redozubov D., Broll G. & Trautz D. (2017) Soil Till. Res., 170, 43–52
8. Paliwal D.K., Kushwaha H.S. and Thakur H.S. (2011) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 56 (4), 334-339.
9. Pandey I.B., Singh S.K. and Tiwari S. (2013) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58(2), 192-197.
10. Yadav A. K., Singh P., Singh K. (2013) Annals of Agri. Bio. Research, 18 (2),146-150.
11. Walkley A. and Black I.A. (1994) Soil science, 37,29-37
12. Subbiah B.V. and Asija G.L. (1956) Current Science, 25, 259-260.
13. Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watnabe P.S. and Dean L.A. (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, USDA Circ, 939.
14. Jackson M.L. (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, 187.