NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR IMPROVING DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION, ITS PARTITIONING, YIELDAND QUALITY OF INDIAN MUSTARD

R.K. DUBEY1, S.L. MUNDRA2, R.C. DHAKER3*, S.K. DUBEY4, REENA DUBEY5
1ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chhalesar, Agra, 282 006, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur Rajasthan, India
3Agriculture Research officer (Agronomy), Deputy Director Agriculture Jila Parishad, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
4ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Water Conservation, Research Centre, Chhalesar, Agra, 282 006, Uttar Pradesh, India
5G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India
* Corresponding Author : rameshagro2011@gmail.com

Received : 04-12-2018     Accepted : 27-12-2018     Published : 30-12-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 24       Pages : 7682 - 7687
Int J Agr Sci 10.24 (2018):7682-7687

Keywords : Brassinolide, Crude protein, Dry matter accumulation, Indole acetic acid, Seed oil content
Academic Editor : Dr Prashant Shrivastava
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur Rajasthan, India. Authors are also thankful to Jila Parishad, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : DUBEY, R.K., et al "NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR IMPROVING DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION, ITS PARTITIONING, YIELDAND QUALITY OF INDIAN MUSTARD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.24 (2018):7682-7687.

Cite - APA : DUBEY, R.K., MUNDRA, S.L., DHAKER, R.C., DUBEY, S.K., DUBEY, REENA (2018). NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR IMPROVING DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION, ITS PARTITIONING, YIELDAND QUALITY OF INDIAN MUSTARD. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (24), 7682-7687.

Cite - Chicago : DUBEY, R.K., S.L. MUNDRA, R.C. DHAKER, S.K. DUBEY, and REENA DUBEY. "NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR IMPROVING DRY MATTER ACCUMULATION, ITS PARTITIONING, YIELDAND QUALITY OF INDIAN MUSTARD." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 24 (2018):7682-7687.

Copyright : © 2018, R.K. DUBEY, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Poor oilseed productivity in India closely interlinks to imbalanced and inadequate fertilization and diverse variety of climate and edaphic adversities. In this backdrop, a study was conducted at Udaipur in Indian mustard during winters of 2012 and 2013 to assess effect of eight nutrient treatments i.e. 75 and 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and their combinations with 5 t farm yard manure ha-1 (FYM), bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter+ PSB) and FYM + bio-fertilizers in main plots and four plant growth regulators or PGRs (water spray, brassinolide/BR0.5 ppm, Indole 3 acetic acid/IAA 50 ppm and BR 0.5 ppm + IAA 50 ppm) in sub plots of a split plot design replicated thrice. Results show that 100% RDF+ FYM + bio-fertilizers registered significantly higher pooled dry matter accumulation (DMA) plant-1 at 30, 60, 90 days after sowing (DAS) and physiological maturity (7.46, 26.36, 34.56 and 57.79 g, respectively); dry matter partitioning (DMP) in siliquae and leaves (53.49 and 14.11%, respectively), seed oil content (38.90%), crude protein in seed (17.24%), harvest index (19.19%) and seed, stover, crude protein and oil yield (3231, 13604, 558 and 1261 kg ha-1, respectively). Among stress mitigating PGRs, BR + IAA outperformed registering significantly higher pooled DMA plant-1at 60, 90 DAS and physiological maturity (24.84, 33.26 and 55.31 g, respectively); DMP in siliquae and leaves (53.35 and 14.90%, respectively), seed oil content (38.59%), crude protein in seed (16.97%) and seed, stover, crude protein and oil yield (2922, 12379, 497 and 1132 kg ha-1, respectively).

References

1. Hedge D.M., Sudhakar Babu S.N., Rana D.S. and Vyas A.K. (2012) Ind. J. Agron.57:58-62.
2. T.S.I. (2014) Sulphur in Indian agriculture. Correction of sulphur deficiency in Indian agriculture. The Sulphur Institute 1020, 19th Street, NW Suite 520 Washington DC 20036 USA.
3. Tandon H.L.S. (2007) Soil nutrient balance sheets in India: Importance, status, issues and concerns. www.ipni.net
4. Pathak H., Mohanty S., Jain N. and Bhatia A. (2010) Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 80:287-299.
5. Chand Subhash and Ram D. (2008) Environ. &Eco.26:43-46.
6. Shekh B.A. (2006) Biotechnology and bio-fertilization: Key to sustainable agriculture. Scientific issue [1] Das, K., R. and Dang, T.N.
7. Bajguz A. and Hayat Shamsul (2009) Plant Physio. &Biochem. 47: 1-8.
8. Biesaga Koscielniak J., Dziurka M., Ostrowska A., Mirek M., Koscielniak J. and Janeczko A. (2014) Aus. J. CropSci.8: 378-388.
9. Rathke G.W., Behrens T. and Diepenbrock W. (2006) Agril.Ecosys. & Environ. 117:80-108.
10. Ali B., Hasan S.A., Hayat S. and Ahmad A. (2007) J.Plant Biol.34:29-33.
11. Ali B., Hayat S., Hasan S. A. and Ahmad A. (2008) Communi. Soil Sci. & Plant Analy. [17/18] 2695-2705.
12. Bao F., Shen J. J., Brady S.R., Muday G.K., Asami T. and Yang Z.B. (2004) Plant Physiol.134:1624-1631.
13. Choudhary S.P., Yu J.Q., Yamaguchi Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. and Lam Son P.T. (2012) Trends Plant Sci.17:594-605.
14. Bajguz A.Piotrowska and Niczyporuk A. (2013) Plant Physio. Biochem.71:290-297.
15. Donald C.M. and Hamblin (1976) Adv. Agron.28: 361-404.
16. Soxhlet F. (1879) Dingler's Polytech J. 232: 461–465.
17. Snell P.D. and Snell G.T. (1949) Colorimetric method of analysis, 3rd ed. Vol. II-D, Van Mastrand Co., Inc. New York.
18. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition. An International Rice Research Institute Book. A Wiley Interscience Publication. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
19. Adesemoye A.O. and Kloepper J.W. (2009) Appl. Microbiol. & Biotech. 85: 1-12.
20. Lewis C.E., Noctor G., Causton D. and Foyer C.H. (2000) Austr. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 507-519.
21. Khan Nafees A., Singh Sarvajeet, Nazar Rahat and Lone Pervez M (2007) The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science.
22. Paul M.J. and Foyer C.H. (2001) J. Expt. Bot.52: 1383-1400.
23. Rogers A., Bryant J.B. Raines C.A., Lung S.P, Blum H. and Frehner M. (1995) Assimilation of photosynthesis to rising CO2 concentration in the field. Is it determined by source/sink balance? In Mathis P [Ed.] Photosynthesis: From light to bio-sphere [Vol. V]. Proceedings of the Xth International Photosynthesis Congress, Montpellier, France 20-25 August, pp 1001-1004.
24. Colnenne C., Meynard J.M., Roche R. and Reau R. (2002) Euro. J. Agron.17: 11–28.
25. Havlin J.L., Beaton J.D., Tistale S.L. and Nelson W.L. (2007) Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 5th Edition, Pearson Education Private Limited Indian Branch, 482 FIE Patpatganj, Delhi, India
26. Pearson Education Private Limited Indian Branch, 482 FIE Patpatganj, Delhi, India.
27. Kumawat A., Pareek B.L.,Yadav R.S. and Rathore P.S. (2014) Ind. J. Agron. [1] 119-123.
28. Dubey R.K., Mundra S.L., Dhaker R.C. and Dubey S.K. (2018) International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10(20), 7401-7405.
29. Hayat S., Ahmad A., Mobin M., Fariduddin Q. and Azam Z.M. (2001) Photosynthetica [1] 111-114.
30. Khaliq S., Dinesh S. and Fozia R. (2006) Environ. & Eco. 24 [Special 2]: 278-280.
31. Fariduddin Q., Khanam S., Hasan S.A., Ali B., Hayat S. and Ahmad A. (2009) Acta Physiol. Plant 31: 889-897.
32. Simoes Aranjo J.L., Rumjanek N.G. and Margis Pinheiro M. (2003) Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 15: 33-41.
33. Ogweno J.O., Song X.S., Shi K., H, W.H., Ma, W.H., Zho, Y.H., Y, J.Q. and Nogues S. (2008) J. Plant Growth Regul. 27: 49-57.