N. VIJAY1*, G.C. MISHRA2
1Central Muga Eri Research and Training Institute, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textile, Govt of India, Lahdoigarh, Jorhat, 785700, Assam, India
2Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India
* Corresponding Author : ntvijay@gmail.com
Received : 01-11-2018 Accepted : 27-11-2018 Published : 30-11-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 22 Pages : 7535 - 7538
Int J Agr Sci 10.22 (2018):7535-7538
Keywords : Artificial Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Root Mean Square Errors, Mean Absolute Percentage Errors and prediction
Academic Editor : Santosha Rathod
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research for providing Senior Research Fellowship (SRF). Authors are also thankful to Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, 221005, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of time series models based on artiï¬cial neural network and support vector machine techniques to predict the area and production of sorghum crop. The data consist of area and production of sorghum crop area (‘000 ha) and production (‘000 MT) from 1955-56 to 2014-15 were collected from “Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2014-15, Karnataka, India [2]. The support vector machine and artiï¬cial neural network models used to predict the area and production of sorghum crop, which is one of most important millet crop of Karnataka. The models’ results are compared using three criteria, i.e., Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root-Mean-Square Errors (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). A comparison of support vector machine results with artiï¬cial neural network method indicates that support vector machine is better than the artiï¬cial neural network method in prediction of the area and production of sorghum.
1. Agriculture Statistics at a Glance (2014-15). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
2. Agriculture Statistics at a Glance (2014-15) Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Karnataka
3. Bilgili M., Sahin B.and Yasar A. (2007) Renewable Energy, 32,2350–2360.
4. Nagaraj N., Basavaraj G. and Parthasarathy Rao P. (2011) International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India, 80 pp.
5. Smola A.J. and Scholkopf B. (2004) Statistics and Computing, 14, 199-222.
6. Vapnik V.N. (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York
7. Vapnik V.N. (2000) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995.