RAM AWATAR MEENA1, DILIP MONGA2, SATISH KUMAR SAIN3*, HAMID HASAN4
1ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Sirsa, 125 055, Haryana, India
2ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Sirsa, 125 055, Haryana, India
3ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Sirsa, 125 055, Haryana, India
4ICAR- Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Regional Station, Sirsa, 125 055, Haryana, India
* Corresponding Author : sain.skumar@gmail.com
Received : 03-06-2018 Accepted : 12-06-2018 Published : 15-06-2018
Volume : 10 Issue : 11 Pages : 6339 - 6342
Int J Agr Sci 10.11 (2018):6339-6342
Keywords : Cotton germplasm, Ginning outturn, Gossypium hirsutum, Yield
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur and Regional Station, Sirsa, 125055, Haryana for providing funding support.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed
The ginning outturn is the most important trait to decide the lint yield. The lower ginning outturn is the reason for lower lint yield in the zone and need immediate attention. 3954 geographically and phenotypically diverse lines of G. hirsutum were screened during 2013-14 to 2015-16 for 3 years for ginning outturn, seed cotton yield and yield contributing traits. A wide range of variability for ginning outturn from 21.7 - 42.0 percent, yield/plant 50.4 -129.8g, number of monopodia 0-13, number of sympodia 0-23, number of bolls/plant 5-47, incidence of CLCuD 0-100 percent were observed in the germplasm. Among the 100 accessions with ginning outturn above 40 percent, the accessions IC 359065 (42), SA 1006 (42), IC 359429 (42), IC 359660 (42) and IC 359383 (42) were observed superior. Among these, the superior accession for yield/plant were IC 359383 (129.2g), IC 359429, for boll number IC 359383 (44), IC 357487 (31), IC 359660 (26), for boll weight SA 1006 (3.58g), IC 359706 (3.5g), IC 359660 (3.5g), for number of monopodia SA 1006 (9), IC 359383 (4), IC 357487 (3); for number of sympodia IC 359429 (15) IC359383 (14), IC 359227 (11) and for tolerance to CLCuD IC 357726, IC 358479, IC 357856 were observed . These can be used for crop improvement programs.
1. Anonymous (2016-17) All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project Report, A3-A5.
2. Ali M.A., Begum S., Uddin M.F., Azad M.A.K., Sharmeen F. (2012) The Agriculturists, 10(1), 10-15.
3. Ramasamy M. (2007) Training Manual. December 15-22, CICR regional station Coimbatore, Published by Director CICR, Nagpur.
4. Anonymous (2014-15) CICR Annual Report, Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur, India,13.
5. Anonymous (2004-05) All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project Coimbatore Report, 11.
6. Sahito J.H, Gao S., Zhi-nie, Abro S. (2016) American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 16 (7), 1358-1361.
7. Salimath P.M. (1975) M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore (India).
8. Rauf S., Khan T.M., Sadaqat H.A., Khan A.I. (2006) International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 4, 686–688.
9. Saeed F., Farooq, J., Mehmood A., Hussain T., Riaz, M. and Ahmed S. (2014) Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 27(3), 226-236.
10. Feiyu T., Xueqin F., Wangcheng M., Xiaofang W., Wenjun X. (2012) Journal of Agricultural Biology, 14 (3), 360-364.