EFFECT OF DATE OF SOWING AND CROP GEOMETRY ON GROWTH, YIELD ATTRIBUTES, YIELD AND QUALITY OF AMARANTHUS (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.)

G.M. VAGHELA1, N.P. CHAUHAN2, M.S. DABHI3, H.K. PATEL4*
1Department of Agronomy, B.A.College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, India
2Department of Agronomy, B.A.College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, India
3Department of Agronomy, B.A.College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, India
4Department of Agronomy, B.A.College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, India
* Corresponding Author : hirenubi@gmail.com

Received : 09-05-2018     Accepted : 21-05-2018     Published : 30-05-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 10       Pages : 6044 - 6046
Int J Agr Sci 10.10 (2018):6044-6046

Keywords : Crop Geometry, Grain yield
Academic Editor : Hazarika Urbashi
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author are thankful to B.A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388110, India for providing facility for carried out experiment.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : VAGHELA, G.M., et al "EFFECT OF DATE OF SOWING AND CROP GEOMETRY ON GROWTH, YIELD ATTRIBUTES, YIELD AND QUALITY OF AMARANTHUS (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.10 (2018):6044-6046.

Cite - APA : VAGHELA, G.M., CHAUHAN, N.P., DABHI, M.S., PATEL, H.K. (2018). EFFECT OF DATE OF SOWING AND CROP GEOMETRY ON GROWTH, YIELD ATTRIBUTES, YIELD AND QUALITY OF AMARANTHUS (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (10), 6044-6046.

Cite - Chicago : VAGHELA, G.M., N.P. CHAUHAN, M.S. DABHI, and H.K. PATEL. "EFFECT OF DATE OF SOWING AND CROP GEOMETRY ON GROWTH, YIELD ATTRIBUTES, YIELD AND QUALITY OF AMARANTHUS (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.)." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 10 (2018):6044-6046.

Copyright : © 2018, G.M. VAGHELA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at College Agronomy Farm, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat to find out the Effect of date of sowing and crop geometry on growth, yield attributes, and yield and quality of amaranthus during Rabi season of the year 2015-16. The experiment consist of twelve treatment combinations comprised of three date of sowing (7th November, 17th November, 27th November) and four crop geometry (30 cm x 15 cm, 30 cm x 30 cm, 45cm x 15 cm and 45 cm x 30 cm). Significantly the highest D1 (7th November) recorded significantly the highest number of panicles (5.95), panicles weight plant-1 (159.34 g), grain yield plant-1 (23.97 g), test weight (0.91 g) and highest lodging percent (19.61%), grain yield (2657 kg ha-1) of amaranthus were recorded by 7th November over 17th November, 27th November. Panicle length (74.76 cm), spikelets length (13.77 cm), least number of days required to 50 % flowering (40.56 days), maturity (103.46 days) and stover yield (6119 kg ha-1). Among crop geometry S3 (45 cm x 15 cm) recorded significantly higher Panicle length (73.90 cm), spikelets length (13.78 cm), number of panicles plant-1 (5.26), panicles weight plant-1 (153.39 g). In case less number of days required for maturity (103.95), grain and stover yields were observed due to different spacings. Spacing S3 (45 cm x 15 cm) recorded significantly higher grain yield (2520 kg ha-1) and stover yield (5762 kg ha-1). The higher net realization of ₹90736 ha-1 and higher B.C.R. value of 5.88 were recorded in date of sowing D1 (7th November). Among crop geometry S3 (45 cm x 15 cm) resulted in higher net realization ₹ 85059 ha-1 with B.C.R. of 5.57.

References

1. Modhvadia J.M., Jadhav K.V. & Dudhat M.S. (2007) Agricultural Science Digest, 27 (4), 279-281.
2. Jackson M.L. (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi
3. Cochran W.G. & Cox G.M. (1967) New York: 546-568.
4. Anonymous (1994) AGRESCO Report, Regional Research Station, G.A.U., S.K. Nagar, pp. 43.
5. Anonymous (1995) AGRESCO Report, Regional Research Station, G.A.U., S.K. Nagar, pp. 271.
6. Patel J. V. (2003) M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis submitted to GAU, S.K. Nagar
7. Troini R.M., Sanchez T.M., Reinaudi N.B. & Ferramola L.A. (2004) Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(3),385-391
8. Modhvadia J.M., Jadhav K.V. & Dudhat M.S. (2007) Agricultural Science Digest, 27 (4), 279-281.
9. Chaudhari J.H., Raj V.C., Rajeev K.S. & Ahir M.P. (2009) Agricultural Science Digest, 29 (2),66-68.
10. Bhaskar J., Bharad G.M. & Patil S.N. (1996) (Amaranthus spp). Indian J. Agron, 41 (1): 181-182.
11. Malligawad L. H. & Patil V. C. (2001) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci, 14 (1), 11-17.
12. Arya M.P.S. & Singh R.V. (2004) Indian J. Agric. Res, 38 (4), 306-309.
13. Patel P.A., Alagundagi S.C., Mnsur C.P., Kubsad V.S., Hosmani S.V. & Megeri S.N. (2011) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24 (5), 651-653.
14. Kumar S.R. & Yassin G.M. (2013) World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9 (2), 173-177.
15. Oluwatonyi (2015) International Journal of Agril. Sci., 5 (4), 697-703.