EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND NITROGEN LEVEL ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare L.) UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS OF PUNJAB REGION

SANDEEP SINGH1*, MOHINDER LAL2, JASHANJOT KAUR3
1PG Department of Agriculture, GSSDGS Khalsa College, Patiala, Punjab, 147001, India
2PG Department of Agriculture, GSSDGS Khalsa College, Patiala, Punjab, 147001, India
3ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Rauni, Patiala, 147001, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, Punjab, India
* Corresponding Author : sandeeps1328@gmail.com

Received : 27-03-2018     Accepted : 12-04-2018     Published : 15-04-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 7       Pages : 5785 - 5787
Int J Agr Sci 10.7 (2018):5785-5787

Keywords : Date of sowing, Nitrogen, Plant Height, Dry Matter, Crop Growth Rate Spike length, Grain yield and biological yield
Academic Editor : Dr Sunil Kumar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to GSSDGS Khalsa College, Patiala, 147001, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : SINGH, SANDEEP, et al "EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND NITROGEN LEVEL ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare L.) UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS OF PUNJAB REGION ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.7 (2018):5785-5787.

Cite - APA : SINGH, SANDEEP, LAL, MOHINDER, KAUR, JASHANJOT (2018). EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND NITROGEN LEVEL ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare L.) UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS OF PUNJAB REGION . International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (7), 5785-5787.

Cite - Chicago : SINGH, SANDEEP, MOHINDER LAL, and JASHANJOT KAUR. "EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND NITROGEN LEVEL ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare L.) UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS OF PUNJAB REGION ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 7 (2018):5785-5787.

Copyright : © 2018, SANDEEP SINGH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2015-16 at Campus for Research and Advance Studies Dhablan, Patiala to evaluate the response of yield and yield attributes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to date of sowing and nitrogen levels. A set of 12 treatment combinations including three dates of sowing viz., 20th October (D1), 16th November (D2) and 10th December (D3) in main plot, and nitrogen control, @ 30 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1, 90 kg ha-1 in sub plot were applied. The results showed that the crop sown on 20th October and 16th November attained statistically similar plant growth characters (in terms of plant height and dry matter accumulation). Crop sown on 20th October received significantly higher effective tiller (364.69 m-2) then other date of sowing (16th November (358.61 m-2) & 10th December (347.66 m-2)). Crop sown on 16th November resulted better yield attributes (Spike length, Number of grains per spikes and test weight) than the 20th October and 10th December. Different date of sowing significantly affects the yield and a yield attributes of barley. Grain yield found to be significant with crop sown on 16th November, however biological yield significant crop sown on 20th October. Application of 90 kg nitrogen per hectare resulted in improvement in most of the growth parameter. Application of 90 kg nitrogen per hectare resulted in improvement in most of yield attributes (Spike length, Number of grains per spikes and test weight). Grain and biological yield significant increase with each increasing in Nitrogen level up-to 90 kg ha-1.

References

1. Alam M.Z., Haider S.A. and Paul N.K. (2005) Journal of Botany, 34(1), 27-30.
2. Alam M.Z. and Haider S.A. (2007) Journal of Applied Sciences Research,3(10), 1022-1026.
3. Anonymous (2013) Progress report of All India Coordinate Wheat and Barley Improvement Project. Barley Network, 6, 327.
4. Anonymous (2016) Package of Practices for rabi Crops of Punjab, 21-24, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
5. Chandra P.S., Sharma P.K. and Sharma V.K. (2015) Agriculture Research Journal, 52(1), 89-91.
6. Chandra P.S., Sharma P.K., Chouksey H.D. and Singh S.K. (2015). The Bioscan, 10(3), 1299-1302.
7. Donovan O., Ding S., Oba M., Swift M.L., J.T., Edney M.J., McAllister, T.A. & Yang W.Z. (2015) Animal Feed Science and Technology, 199, 146-151.
8. Fahad A. and Samir A.S. (2015) International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research,18, 136-140.
9. Jena S., Basu S., Maji S., Bandyopadhyay P., Nath R. and Chakraborthy P.K. (2014) The Ecoscan, 8(3&4), 279-285.
10. Juskin P. and Helm J.H. (2003) Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83, 275-81.
11. Mohammadi A.S. and Farideh S. (2014) International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2, 295-299.
12. Pankaj Sooraj Chandra, Sharma Pawan Kumar, Chouksey H.D. and Singh S.K. (2015) The Bioscan, 10(3), 1299-1302.
13. Patel A.M., Patel D.R., Patel G.A. and Thakor D.M. (2004) Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49, 171-73.
14. Rashid A. & Ullah Khan R. (2010) World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6, 480-484.
15. Shokat S. and Mani M. (2015) Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 5 (1), 195-202.
16. Singh B. (2005) M.Sc. Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
17. Yadav A.K., Chauhan S.K. and Shroti S.K. (2012) Annals of Plant and Soil Research, 14(2), 159-162.