EFFECT OF PHYSICO- CHEMICAL CHANGES OF CASHEW JUICE BLENDED BEVERAGES

LAKSHMANA¹*, MAHESH MATH², S. SACHIN³, H.C. VIKRAM^4
1ICAR-Agricultural Research Station, Ullal, 575020, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Research Sciences, Shivamogga, 577 204, Karnataka
²ICAR-Agricultural Research Station, Ullal, 575020, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Research Sciences, Shivamogga, 577 204, Karnataka
³ICAR-Agricultural Research Station, Ullal, 575020, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Research Sciences, Shivamogga, 577 204, Karnataka
⁴ICAR-Zonal Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Brahmavar, 576213, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Research Sciences, Shivamogga, 577 204, Karnataka
* Corresponding Author : lakshmanaupladi@gmail.com

Received : 02-04-2018     Accepted : 12-04-2018     Published : 15-04-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 7       Pages : 5758 - 5760
Int J Agr Sci 10.7 (2018):5758-5760

Keywords : Effect, Physico-chemical, Cashew juice, Edible juice
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to University of Agricultural and Horticultural Research Sciences, Shivamogga, 577 204, Karnataka
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

The study was conducted at Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Ullal during 2016-17. The effect of physco-chemical changes of the cashew apple juice with other edible juices during the year 2016, revealed that significantly highest optical density of the juice was recorded in T1- Control (0.40) followed by T2 (C+N) and T5 –(C+N+T) (0.38 and 0.37, respectively). The lowest optical density was reported in T8- (C+N+T+P) (0.26). During the year 2017, with respect to the optical density of the juice the same trend was observed, recorded significantly highest colour value in T1 (Control) (0.38) followed by T2 (C+N). During 2016, significantly highest thickness value was recorded in T1 (control) (1.53) followed by T2 (C+N) recorded 1.43. During 2017, significantly highest thickness value was recorded in T1 (Control) 1.41 followed by while, lowest was recorded (1.20 each) in T6 (C+N+P), T7 (C+T+P) and T8 (C+N+T+P). During 2016, significantly highest TSS value was recorded in T1 (control) (12.00) followed by T4 (C+P) (11.00). Significantly lowest TSS value was recorded in T6 (C+N+P) and T8 (C+N+T+P) (9.80). During 2017, significantly highest TSS value was recorded in T1 (Control) and T4 (C+P) (10.06). Significantly lowest TSS value was recorded in T (C+N+T) (9.19).

1. Director of Cashew nut and Cocoa Development (2017)
2. Sobhana A., Mathew J., Mini C. and Pushpalatha P.B. (2013) Souv. Nat. Conf. Cashew, 65-71.
3. De Oliveira V.H. and Barros L.M. (2009) Proc 4th Annual ACA Conf on Value and Efficiency Abidjan, Coted’Ivoire, 1–3 September, pp 4–5, 17–18.
4. Narayan Chattopadhyay and Ghosh S.N. (1993) Cashew, 7 (1), 12-14.
5. Carvalho O.M.D., Maia G.A., Figueiredo R.W. and Rodrigues S. (2007) Journal of Food Quality, 30(5), 664 – 681.
6. Roy A., Prasanna Kumar B. Swami D. V. And Subbramamma P. (2016) Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 11 (1), 37-43.
7. Anand A., Sahu G.S. and Mishra H.N. (2012) International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences, 1 (4), 2348 – 3997.
8. Sobhana A., Ambili A.A. and Mredula R.C. (2014) Indian Journal of Horticulture, 71 (3), 397-401.