RESPONSE OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF UREA, BORON AND 2,4-D IN ACID LIME (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) UNDER MALWA PLATEAU CONDITIONS

A. CHOUHAN1, P. SONKAR2, R.N. KANPURE3, S.R. ANJANAWE4, A. HALDAR5*
1College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
2College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
3College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
4College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
5College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh
* Corresponding Author : ajayhldr@gmail.com

Received : 02-04-2018     Accepted : 12-04-2018     Published : 15-04-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 7       Pages : 5727 - 5729
Int J Agr Sci 10.7 (2018):5727-5729

Keywords : Urea, Boron, Acid Lime and 2,4-D
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalayas, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : CHOUHAN , A., et al "RESPONSE OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF UREA, BORON AND 2,4-D IN ACID LIME (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) UNDER MALWA PLATEAU CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.7 (2018):5727-5729.

Cite - APA : CHOUHAN , A., SONKAR, P., KANPURE, R.N., ANJANAWE, S.R., HALDAR, A. (2018). RESPONSE OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF UREA, BORON AND 2,4-D IN ACID LIME (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) UNDER MALWA PLATEAU CONDITIONS. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (7), 5727-5729.

Cite - Chicago : CHOUHAN , A., P. SONKAR, R.N. KANPURE, S.R. ANJANAWE, and A. HALDAR. "RESPONSE OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF UREA, BORON AND 2,4-D IN ACID LIME (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) UNDER MALWA PLATEAU CONDITIONS." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 7 (2018):5727-5729.

Copyright : © 2018, A. CHOUHAN, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out in the Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Mandsaur, Madhya Pradesh, India during 2015-16 on eight years old plant of acid lime. There were twelve treatments comprising of three levels of urea (1%, 2% and 3%), boron (0.4%, 0.6%and 0.8%) and 2,4-D (10, 20 and 30 ppm), and their combinations (Urea 1% + Boron 0.4% + 2,4-D 10 ppm, Urea 2% + Boron 0.6% + 2,4-D 20 ppm and Urea 3% + Boron 0.8% + 2,4-D 30 ppm) with control. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block design with three replications. Foliar spray was done on first week of July and same spray was repeated after 30 days with the urea, boron, 2,4-D and their combinations at pea stage of fruit. It was found that foliar spray of urea 3% + boron 0.8% + 2,4-D 30 ppm significantly increased the plant height and canopy spread (E-W and N-S direction), and also showed the better result for leaf length, leaf width and leaf area. However, foliar spray of urea 2% + boron 0.6% + 2,4-D 20 ppm gave the best values for number of flowers per plant, fruit set, fruit retention and fruit drop.

References

1. Debaje P. P., Shinde Ekta D. and Ingale H. V. (2011) The Asian J. Hort., 6(1), 253 – 255.
2. Reuther W., Batchelor L.D. and Webber H.J. (1968) The citrus industry - Volume 2. University of California Division of Agriculture, Oakland, CA.
3. Maurer M.A. and Davies F.S. (1993) Proc. Fla. Hort. Soc. 106,22-30.
4. Karim M.R., Wright G.C. and Taylor K.C. (1996) Effect of foliar boron sprays on yield and fruit quality of citrus. 1996 Citrus Research Report. University of Arizona, College of Agriculture, Tucson, AZ, Series P-105.
5. Prasad H., Prasad D., Bhan C., Bairwa S. K., Babu S. and Pal S. (2013) J. Progressive Agri., 4(1), 148-153.
6. Choudhary H. D., Jain M. C., Sharma M. K. and Bhatnagar P. (2013) The Asian J. Hort., 8(2), 746-750.
7. Jain M. C., Choudhary H. D., Sharma M. K. and Singh B. (2014) Environment & Ecology, 32 (3A), 1141-1145.
8. Khan A. S., Ullah W., Malik A. U., Ahmad R., Saleem B. A. and Rajwana I. A. (2012) Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 49(2), 113 – 119.
9. Gurjar M.K., Kaushik R.A. and Baraily P. (2015) International J. of Sci. Res., 4(4), 2277-8179.
10. Jagtap V. M., Patel, H. C., Nehete, D. S. and Godage, S. S. (2013) The Asian J. of Hort., 6(1), 253 - 255.
11. Iqbal M., Khan M.Q., Jalal-ud-Din, Khalid Rehman and Munir M. (2009) J. Agric. Res., 47(3), 259-269.
12. Yadav H.C., Yadav A.L., Yadav D.K. and Yadav P.K. (2011) Plant Archives., 11(1), 147-149.
13. Prasad Bijendra, Das Sudhir, Chatterjee D. and Singh U.P. (2005) J. Appl. Biol., 15, (1) 48-50.
14. Dixit A., Shaw S. S. and Pal V. (2013) Hort. Flora. Res. Spectrum., 2(1), 77-80.
15. Ashraf Y. M., Ashraf M., Akhtar M., Mahmood and Muhammad Saleem (2013) Pak. J. Bot., 45(SI), 433-440.