EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NUTRIENTS ON FLOWERING AND YIELD PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CASHEW VARIETIES

LAKSHMANA1*, H.C. VIKRAM2, S. SACHIN3, MAHESH MATH4
1Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Ullal, Mangalore, 575 020, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, 577201, Karnataka
2ICAR - Zonal Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Brahmavar, 576213, Udupi, India
3University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, 587104, Karnataka
4Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Ullal, Mangalore, 575 020, University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga, 577201, Karnataka
* Corresponding Author : lakshmanaupladi@gmail.com

Received : 19-03-2018     Accepted : 26-03-2018     Published : 30-03-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 6       Pages : 5536 - 5538
Int J Agr Sci 10.6 (2018):5536-5538

Keywords : Foliar, Nutrient, flower, Yield, Varieties, Anacardium occidentale L
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492012, Chhattisgarh
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : LAKSHMANA, et al "EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NUTRIENTS ON FLOWERING AND YIELD PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CASHEW VARIETIES ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.6 (2018):5536-5538.

Cite - APA : LAKSHMANA, VIKRAM, H.C., SACHIN, S., MATH, MAHESH (2018). EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NUTRIENTS ON FLOWERING AND YIELD PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CASHEW VARIETIES . International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (6), 5536-5538.

Cite - Chicago : LAKSHMANA, H.C. VIKRAM, S. SACHIN, and MAHESH MATH. "EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF NUTRIENTS ON FLOWERING AND YIELD PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CASHEW VARIETIES ." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 6 (2018):5536-5538.

Copyright : © 2018, LAKSHMANA, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The study was conducted at Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Ullal, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka during 2015 and 2016 on 15 years old cashew plantation of different varietal plot. The results revealed that early bearing type of cashew recorded significantly highest seed weight in Ullal-3 UT of 11.03 gm and highest apple weight recorded in UN-50 UT (101.60gm) followed by UN-50 T (98.40 gm). Significantly highest seed size was observed in UN-50 UT (12.45 gm) followed by UN 50 T (11.55 gm) and highest apple size was recorded in Ullal-3 UT (40.30 gm) where as lowest apple size was recorded in Ullal-4 T (24.30 gm). Highest no. of perfect flowers was recorded in Venurla-7 T (28.80). Significantly highest yield was recorded in Vengurla-7 T (14.42kg per tree) followed by Ullal-2 T (13.48 kg per tree). In late bearing type of cashew varieties significantly highest seed weight was recorded in Nairobi UT 10.66 gm followed by Nairobi T (10.27 gm). Significantly highest apple weight was recorded in Nairobi UT (120.20 gm) followed by Nairobi T (117.36 gm) and highest seed size was recorded in Ullal-1 UT (10.60 gm) followed by VRI-3 T (9.35 gm). Significantly highest apple size was recorded in Nairobi UT (43.50 gm) and highest no. of perfect flowers was recorded in NDR 2-1 T (28.60). Significantly highest yield was recorded in NDR 2-1 T (18.15kg per tree) followed by Ullal-1 T (17.23 kg per tree).

References

1. Director of Cashewnut and Cocoa Development (2017)
2. Kumar N., Ponnuswami V., Jeeva S., Ravindran C. and Kalaivanan D. (2012) Chronica Horticulturae, 52(1), 23-29.
3. Albert V. and Krishnasamy V. (2004) TNAU, Coimbatore, 3.
4. Murali K., Prasanna Kumar P. and Aneesa Rani M. S. (2015) The Bioscan., 10 (1): 411-415.
5. Aneesa rani M.S., Jeeva S. and Vaidyanathan R. (2011) In: 1stInternational symposium on cashew nut, held at AC & RI, TNAU, Madurai, 09 -12 December 2011.
6. Kumar N., Selvi, Sures R.J., Balakrishna, S. and Georg E. (2009) 23 - 25 September 2009, 118 - 120.
7. Wojcik P. and Klamkowski K. (2005) J. plant Nutr., 28, 1397-1411.
8. Rajamanickam C., Rathinasamy A., Jeeva Jothi L. (2015) Information Systems Division, National Agricultural Library.