GROWTH, YIELD AND PRODUCTIVITY OF POTATO AS INFLUENCED BY DATE OF PLANTING AND GENOTYPES

C.K. PATEL1, S.K. CHONGTHAM2*, R.N. PATEL3, J.K. PATEL4, D.M. ZAPADIYA5
1Pulse Research Station, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506, Gujarat
2Potato Research Station, Deesa, 385 535, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506
3Potato Research Station, Deesa, 385 535, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506
4Potato Research Station, Deesa, 385 535, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506
5Potato Research Station, Deesa, 385 535, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506
* Corresponding Author : sunil.sunil.ch@gmail.com

Received : 15-03-2018     Accepted : 23-03-2018     Published : 30-03-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 6       Pages : 5500 - 5502
Int J Agr Sci 10.6 (2018):5500-5502

Keywords : Date of planting, Genotypes, Productivity, Tuberyield
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to AICRP (Potato) (ICAR) for providing financial support for the experiment. Author thankful to Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dantiwada, 385506, Gujarat
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : PATEL, C.K., et al "GROWTH, YIELD AND PRODUCTIVITY OF POTATO AS INFLUENCED BY DATE OF PLANTING AND GENOTYPES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.6 (2018):5500-5502.

Cite - APA : PATEL, C.K., CHONGTHAM, S.K., PATEL, R.N., PATEL, J.K., ZAPADIYA, D.M. (2018). GROWTH, YIELD AND PRODUCTIVITY OF POTATO AS INFLUENCED BY DATE OF PLANTING AND GENOTYPES. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (6), 5500-5502.

Cite - Chicago : PATEL, C.K., S.K. CHONGTHAM, R.N. PATEL, J.K. PATEL, and D.M. ZAPADIYA. "GROWTH, YIELD AND PRODUCTIVITY OF POTATO AS INFLUENCED BY DATE OF PLANTING AND GENOTYPES." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 6 (2018):5500-5502.

Copyright : © 2018, C.K. PATEL, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Three years studies were conducted at Potato Research Station, SDAU, Deesa to study the effect of date of planting and genotypes on growth, yield and productivity of potato. Results revealed that planting of potato from 15th November registered marked improvement in biometric attributes like plant emergence, plant height and number of leaves/plant thus ultimately yielded significantly higher tuber yield and productivity (net return, BCR, net return per day, water use efficiency and crop productivity). Also, further delay in potato planting by 10 days i.e, 25th November resulted in statistically similar growth, tuber yield and productivity of potato. Among genotypes, Kufri Pukhraj and Kufri Badshah emerged out as better performing genotypes in relation to growth, yield and productivity for the region

References

1. FAO (2010) Strengthening potato value chains: Technical and policy options for developing countries.
2. Fahad Shah, Bajwa Ali A., Nazir Usman, Anjum Shakeel A., Farooq Ayesha, Zohaib Ali, Sadia Sehrish, Nasim Wajid, Adkins Steve, Saud Shah, Ihsan Muhammad Z., Alharby Hesham, Wu Chao, Wang Depeng and Huang Jianliang (2017) Front Plant Sci., 8, 1147.
3. Hoffmann C.M. and Kluge-Severin S. (2010) Field Crop. Res., 119, 238-244.
4. Jain Lokesh Kumar (2016) Scenario of Quality Potato Production in Rajasthan. pp: 152-168. In: Sunil Londhe (Ed.) Sustainable Potato Production and the Impact of Climate Change, IGI Global p. 323.
5. Amarananjundeswara H., Prasad P. S., Shetty Soumya and Sandhya G.C. (2018) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 7(2), 341-350.
6. Thongam Bijeta, Kadam A. S., Singh Atom Anil and Singh Yanglem Herojit (2017) J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 6(6), 1243-1246.