ROLE OF DIGESTION MODIFIERS AS FEED ADDITIVES IN RUMINANTS- A REVIEW

SUSHIL KUMAR1*, NARENDER SINGH2, SAJJAN SIHAG3, ZILE SINGH SIHAG4
1Department of Animal Nutrition, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125004, India
2Livestock Production Management, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125004, India
3Department of Animal Nutrition, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125004, India
4Department of Animal Nutrition, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125004, India
* Corresponding Author : chahar53@gmail.com

Received : 26-02-2018     Accepted : 02-03-2018     Published : 15-03-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 5       Pages : 5272 - 5275
Int J Agr Sci 10.5 (2018):5272-5275

Keywords : Ruminant, Feed Additives, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Enzymes
Academic Editor : Dr Asha Poonia
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, 125004
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : KUMAR, SUSHIL, et al "ROLE OF DIGESTION MODIFIERS AS FEED ADDITIVES IN RUMINANTS- A REVIEW." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10.5 (2018):5272-5275.

Cite - APA : KUMAR, SUSHIL, SINGH, NARENDER, SIHAG, SAJJAN, SIHAG, ZILE SINGH (2018). ROLE OF DIGESTION MODIFIERS AS FEED ADDITIVES IN RUMINANTS- A REVIEW. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 10 (5), 5272-5275.

Cite - Chicago : KUMAR, SUSHIL, NARENDER SINGH, SAJJAN SIHAG, and ZILE SINGH SIHAG. "ROLE OF DIGESTION MODIFIERS AS FEED ADDITIVES IN RUMINANTS- A REVIEW." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, no. 5 (2018):5272-5275.

Copyright : © 2018, SUSHIL KUMAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

In the interest of animal health as well as economic animal production, feed additives are increasingly being given to animals, such as enzymes, buffers, probiotics, prebiotics etc. Animal feed additives are used worldwide for their varying range of advantages. Some of the feed additives cover the needs of essential nutrients while others increase the growth performance, feed intake and therefore optimize the feed utilization by the animals leading to economical livestock production. Feed additives can also positively affect technological properties of the feed and animal product quality as well. The health status of dairy animals with high growth and production performance need due consideration while choosing a feed additive. In many countries use of feed additives which impose high risk to the consumers or environment, like antibiotics, hormone etc. is banned in ruminant diets. Therefore, ruminant feed industry is becoming more interested in other valuable alternatives feed additives which could be accepted preferable by the consumers without any health risk. Probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes and ionophores etc. can be seen as alternative feed additives for modifying the digestion kinetics in the ruminant animals leading to accelerated production efficiency.

References

1. Ganai A.M., Sharma T. and Dhuria R. K. (2015) Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol., 15, 145-153.
2. Kumar S., Sehgal J.P., Puniya A.K. and Kumari R. (2015) Indian J. Anim. Sci., 85(3), 275-281.
3. Mookiah S., Sieo C.C., Ramasamy K., Abdullah N. and Ho Y.W. (2014) J. Sci. Food and Agriculture. , 94(2), 341-348.
4. Ahmed S. T., Islam M. M., Mun H. S., Sim H. J., Kim Y. J. and Yang C. J. (2014) Poult. Sci. , 93(8), 1963–1971.
5. Chaucheyras-Durand F., Walkera N.D. and Bach A. (2008) Anim. Fd. Sci. Tech. , 145, 5 - 26.
6. Weinberg Z.G., Muck, R.E., Weimer P.J., Chen Y. and Gamburg M. (2004) Appl. Biochemical Biotechnol , 118(1-3), 1–9.
7. Boyd J., West J. and Bernard J. (2011) J. Dairy Sci., 94(9), 4616–4622.
8. Desnoyers M., Giger-Reverdin S., Bertin G., Duvaux-Ponter C. and Sauvant D. (2009) J. dairy sci., 92, 1620-1632.
9. Dawson K., Newman K. and Boling J. (1990) J. Anim. Sci., 68(10), 3392–3398.
10. Newbold C. (1996) Annals Zootechnol., 45 (1), 329–335.
11. Ding G., Chang Y., Zhao L., Zhou Z., Ren L. and Meng Q. (2014) J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 5(1), 24–32.
12. Duffield T., Plaizier J., Fairfield A., Bagg R., Vessie G., Dick P., Wilson J., Aramini J. and McBride B. (2004) J. Dairy Sci., 87(1),59–66.
13. Plaizier J., Krause D., Gozho G. and McBride B. (2008) Vet. J., 176 (1), 21–31.
14. Gozho G., Plaizier J., Krause D., Kennedy A. and Wittenberg K. (2005) J. Dairy Sci., 88(4),1399–1403.
15. Owens F., Secrist D., Hill W. and Gill D. (1998) J. Anim. Sci., 76, 275–286.
16. Lettat A., Nozière P., Silberberg M., Morgavi D.P., Berger C. and Martin C. (2012) BMC Microbiol, 12(1), 142.
17. Prabhu R., Altman E. and Eiteman M.A. (2012) Appl. Environ. Micro¬biol., 78(24), 8564–8570.
18. Kung L. and Hession A. (1995) J. Anim. Sci., 73(1), 250–256.
19. Thrune M., Bach A., Ruiz-Moreno M., Stern M. and Linn J. (2009) Sci., 124(1), 261–265.
20. Marden J., Julien C., Monteils V., Auclair E., Moncoulon R. and Bayourthe C. (2008) J. Dairy Sci., 91(9), 3528–3535.
21. Chiquette J., Talbot G., Markwell F., Nili N. and Forster R. (2007) Canadian J. Anim. Sci., 87(2), 237–249.
22. Klieve A.V., McLennan S.R. and Ouwerkerk D. (2012) Anim. Prod. Sci., 52(5), 297–304.
23. Schrezenmeir J. And De-Vrese M. (2001) Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 73,354-361.
24. Semeniuk W., Klebaniuk R., Grela E.R. (2008) Dzierdziówka- Lublin., 139-154.
25. Kontula P. (1999) Finn. J. Dairy Sci., 54,1-2.
26. Meyer D. (2008) Agro-Food Ind. Hi-Tech., 19,12-15.
27. Swennen K., Courtin C.M., Delcour J.A. (2006) Grit. Rev. Fd. Sci. Nut., 46(6),459-471.
28. Grela E. R., Lipiec A., Pisarski R. (2013) WydawnictwoNaukowe PWN, Warszawa., 311-335.
29. Krause D.O., Bhandari S.K., House J.D. and Nyachoti C.M. (2010) Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 76,8192-8200.
30. Russell J.B. (2002) Rumen microbiology and its role in ruminant nutrition. Ithaca, NY.
31. Baines D., Erb S. and Lowe R. (2011) A prebiotic, Celmanax, decreases Escherichia coli O157,H7 colonization of bovine cells and feed-associated cytotoxicity in vitro. BMC Res. Notes 4.
32. Branner G.R. and Roth-Maier D.A. (2006) Arch. Anim. Nutr., 60,191-204.
33. Collins D.M. and Gibson G.R. (1999) Amer. J. Clin. Nutr., 69,1052S-1057S.
34. Vandeplas S., Dubois Dauphin R., Beckers Y., Thonart P. and Thewis A. (2010) J. Food Prot., 73,774-785.
35. Bomba A., Nemcova R., Mudronova D. and Guba P. (2002) Trends Food Sci. Tech., 13,121-126.
36. Nagaraja T. G., Newbold C. J., Nevel C. J. and Demeyer D.I. (1997) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Springer, Netherlands.
37. Flint H. J., Zhang J.X. and Martin J. (1994) Curr. Microbiol., 29,139-143.
38. Ali B.R.S., ZhouL., Graves F.M., Freedman R.B., Black G.W, Gilbert H.J. and Hazlewood G.P. (1995) FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 125,15-22.
39. Yanke L. J., Selinger L.B. and Cheng K.J. (1995) Proceedings, 23rd Biennial Conf. Rumen Function, Chicago, IL.p. 32.
40. Burroughs W., Woods W., Ewing S.A., Greig J. and Theurer A.B. (1960) J. Anim. Sci., 19,458-464.
41. Rovics J. J. and Ely C.M. (1962) J. Anim. Sci., 21,10-12.
42. Rust J. W., Jacobsen N.L., McGilliard A.D. and Hotchkiss D.K. (1965) J. Anim. Sci., 24,156-160.
43. Beauchemin K. A., Jones S.D.M., Rode L. M. and Sewalt V.J.H. (1997) Canadian J. Anim. Sci., 77, 645-653.
44. McAllister T. A., Oosting S. J., Popp J. D., Mir Z., Yanke L.J., Hristov A.N., Treacher R.J. and Cheng K.J. (1998) Canadian J. Anim. Sci., (in press).
45. Pritchard G., Hunt C., Allen A. and Treacher R. (1996) J. Anim. Sci., 74(1), 296.
46. Hristov A.N., McAllister T.A. and Cheng K.J. (1998) Anim. Fd. Sci. Technol., 76,165-172.
47. Sanchez W.K., Hunt C.W., Guy M.A., Pritchard G.T., Swanson B.I., Warner T.B. and Higgins J.M. (1996) J. Dairy Sci., 79(1), 183.
48. Beauchemin K.A., Rode L.M., Yang Z. and McAllister T.A. (1998) Proceedings of the 33rd Pacific Northwest Nutrition Conference. Vancouver, British Columbia, pp. 121-135.
49. Kirchgessner M. and Roth F.X. (1988) ÜbersichtenzurTierernährung., 16,93-108.
50. Newbold C.J. and Rode L.M. (2006) Intl. Cong. Series., 1293, 138–147.
51. Bayaru E., Kanda S., Kamada T., Itabashi H., Andoh S., Nishida T., Ishida M., Itoh T., Nagara K. and Isobe Y. (2001) Anim. Sci. J., 72,139– 146.
52. Patra A., Park T., Kim M. and Yu Z. (2017) J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 8:13.
53. Wallace R.J. Wood T.A. Rowe A. Price J. Yanez D.R. Williams S.P. and Newbold C.J. (2005) Intl. Cong. Series., 1293, 148-151.
54. Castillo C., Benedito J.L., Mendez J., Pereira V., Lopez-Alonso M., Miranda M. and Hernandez J. (2004) Anim. Fd. Sci. Tech.,115(1),101-116.
55. Martin S.A. (1998) J. Anim. Sci., 76(12), 3123-3132.
56. Callaway T.R. and Martin S.A. (1996) J. anim. Sci., 74(8),1982-1989.
57. Martin S.A., Streeter M.N., Nisbet D.J., Hill G.M. and Williams S.E. (1999) J. Anim. Sci., 77,1008– 1015.
58. Khampa S. and Wanapat M. (2007) Pakistan J. Nutr., 6(1), 20-27.
59. Nisbet D.J. and Martin S.A. (1990) In: Biotechnology in feed industry (Ed. T. P. Lyons). Alltech Technical Publications, Nicholasville, Kentucky. pp. 563-567.
60. Newbold C.J., López S., Nelson N., Ouda J.O., Wallace R.J. and Moss A.R. (2005) British J. Nutr., 94(01), 27-35.
61. Sanson D.W. and Stallcup O.T. (1984) Nutr. Rep. Int., 30, 1261–1267.
62. Asanuma N., Iwamoto M. and Hino T. (1999) J. Dairy Sci., 82, 780–787.
63. Hobson P.N. and Stewart C.S. (2007) The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Springer, Netherlands.
64. Yang W.Z., Benchaar C., Ametaj B.N., Chaves A.V., He M.L. and McAllister T.A. (2007) J. Dairy Sci., 90,5671–5681.
65. McGuffey R.K., Richardson L.F. and Wilkinson J.I.D. (2001) J. Dairy Sci., 4, 194–203.
66. Guffanti A.A., Davidson L.F., Mann T.M. and Krulwich T.A. (1979) J. Gen. Microbiol., 114, 201-206.
67. Mecitoglu Z., Kasap S.C., Ozduven M.L., Ozder M. and Kennerman E. (2017) Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 41: 667-671.