QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF NOODLES ENRICHED WITH Spirulina platensis POWDER

VATSALA SAHARAN1*, SUDESH JOOD2
1Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004
2Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004
* Corresponding Author : vatsala.saharan@gmail.com

Received : 03-03-2017     Accepted : 16-03-2017     Published : 24-03-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 14       Pages : 4091 - 4094
Int J Agr Sci 9.14 (2017):4091-4094

Keywords : Spirulina platensis powder, Noodles, Supplementation, Organoleptic acceptability, Nutritional quality
Academic Editor : Apriyanto Mulono, Jadhav P.V.
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : I would like to thanks my major advisor Dr. (Mrs.) Sudesh Jood, Professor and Head, Department of Foods and Nutrition, College of Home Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004 for her guidance during my research work
Author Contribution : Both author equal contributed

Cite - MLA : SAHARAN, VATSALA and JOOD, SUDESH "QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF NOODLES ENRICHED WITH Spirulina platensis POWDER." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9.14 (2017):4091-4094.

Cite - APA : SAHARAN, VATSALA, JOOD, SUDESH (2017). QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF NOODLES ENRICHED WITH Spirulina platensis POWDER. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 9 (14), 4091-4094.

Cite - Chicago : SAHARAN, VATSALA and SUDESH, JOOD. "QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF NOODLES ENRICHED WITH Spirulina platensis POWDER." International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 9, no. 14 (2017):4091-4094.

Copyright : © 2017, VATSALA SAHARAN and SUDESH JOOD, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Supplementation of noodles with Spirulina platensis powder was done at 2, 4, 6 and 8% levels to improve its nutritional quality. Developed enriched noodles were found organoleptically acceptable by the panelists up to 6% level. With regard to nutritional quality, among the fortified noodles, 6% Spirulina supplemented noodles yielded higher contents of protein (15.60%), fat (9.82%), crude fibre (3.29%), ash (1.87%), carbohydrate (69.42%) and energy (428.46 kcal/100g). Fatty acid profile of 6% Spirulina enriched noodles were found superior than the other supplemented noodles. These were as palmitic, oleic, α-linolenic and γ-linolenic acid 42.00, 17.44, 1.05 and 2.10% of total fatty acids, respectively. Total and available minerals were also found higher in 6% Spirulina supplemented noodles i.e82.10, 378.49, 139.40, 6.69 and 2.32 mg/100g of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron and zinc, respectively, whereas, in vitro availability of iron, calcium and zinc were found as 51.33, 54.00 and 59.79%, respectively.

References

1. Chauhan A. and Intelli (2014) International Journal of Nutrition and Agriculture Research, 1(2), 93 - 98.
2. Ravi M., Lata De S., Azharuddin S. and Paul S.F.D. (2010) Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, 2, 73–83.
3. Tang G. and Suter P.M. (2011) Journal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Science, 1(2), 111-118.
4. Vijayarani D., Ponnalaghu S. and Rajathivya J. (2012) International Journal of Health Science and Research, 2(4), 42-47.
5. Patel A., Mishra S. and Glosh P. (2006) Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysiology, 43, 25-31.
6. AOAC. (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D.C.
7. Paul A.A and Southgate A.D. (1979) The composition of food. 4th Edition, Elsevier North, Holland Biomedical Press, Amestrdam. pp, 5-11.
8. Vasudev S., Yadava D.K., Malik D., Tanwar R.S. and Prabhu K.V. (2008) A simplified method for fatty acid analysis of oilseeds. Division of Genetics; Division of Agricultural Chemicals, Indian Agricultural Research institute, New Delhi-110 012.
9. Lindsey W.L. and Norwell M.A. (1969) Agronomy Abstract, 61, 84-89.
10. Chen P.S., Tosibara T.Y. and Warner H. (1956) Anals of Chemistry, 28, 1756-1759.
11. Rao B.S.N. and Prabhavathi T. (1978) American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 31, 169-173.
12. Kim H. and Zemel M.B. (1986) Journal of Food Science, 51, 957-963.
13. Sheoran O.P. and Pannu R.S. (1999) Statistical Package for agricultural workers. “O. P. Stat” College of Agriculture, Kaul, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. India.
14. Lemes A.C., Takeuchi K.P., Carvalho J.C.M. and Danesi E.D.G. (2012) Brazilian Archives Biology Technology, 55, 15-25.
15. Ponciano G.Y. (2015) International Journal of Current Research in Bioscience and Plant Biology, 2(5), 92-100.
16. Figueira F.S., Crizel T.M., Silva C.R. and Salas-Mellado M.M. (2011) Brazil Journal of Food Technology, 14(4), 308-316.
17. Selmo M.S. and Salas-Mellado M.M. (2014) International Food Research Journal, 21(4), 1523-1528.
18. Minh, N.P. (2014) International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Development, 1(4), 36-44.
19. Abd El Baky H.H., El-Baroty G.S. and Ibrahem E.A. (2015) Nutrition Hospitalaria, 32(1), 231-241.
20. Mamatha B., Namitha K., Senthi A., Smitha J. and Ravishankr G. (2007) Food Chemistry, 101, 1707-1713.
21. Chaudhary H. (2011) Nutritional and sensory evaluation of bakery products development from composite flour. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of Foods and Nutrition, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.