SANTOSH S. YUMNAM1, NETAJIT S. LEIMAPOKPAM2, GANESHKUMAR D. REDE3*, CHAKRABARTY S. YUMLEMBAM4
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, 741252, West Bengal, India
2Department of Agricultural Statistics, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari, 396450, Gujarat, India
3Department of Agricultural Economics, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, 741252, West Bengal, India
4Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, 795004, Manipur, India
* Corresponding Author : ganeshrede3156@gmail.com
Received : 18-05-2016 Accepted : 27-05-2016 Published : 18-09-2016
Volume : 8 Issue : 37 Pages : 1774 - 1776
Int J Agr Sci 8.37 (2016):1774-1776
Keywords : Rice, Hybrid, Improved varieties, MVP, MFC, Technical Efficiency
Academic Editor : Nimit Kumar
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : None declared
Author Contribution : None declared
The results of the regression analysis revealed that the farmers were in the second stage of production, which is, diminishing returns to scale in case of both the two types of cultivation. The efficiency computation indicated that fertilizers (1.14), plant protection chemical (16.53) and machine labour (2.51) were being underutilized in hybrid rice type of cultivation, whereas in case of improved varieties of rice cultivation MVP-MFC ratio indicated that fertilizer (3.32) and machine labour (3.03) were being underutilized. But in both the two farms, there was excessive use of human labour. This indicated that suitable alteration is essential for ideal distribution of inputs and to exploit the returns from both the two type of cultivation. The average technical efficiency was slightly high in improved varieties of rice cultivation (96.73%) than in hybrid rice cultivation (95.05%).