EFFECT OF LABORATORY ISOLATED Lactobacillus reuteri LRJFCM30 FROM GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT OF RED JUNGLE FOWL ON HEMATOLOGY AND SERUM BIOCHEMISTRY OF BROILER CHICKEN

S.K. JAISWAL¹*, S. TOMAR², V.K. SAXENA³, S. BALRAJ⁴, SAJID AYAZ^5
1Division of Avian Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
²Division of Avian Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
³Division of Avian Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
⁴Division of Avian Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
⁵Division of Avian Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : sjsudhirjaiswal009@gmail.com

Received : 09-07-2018     Accepted : 23-07-2018     Published : 30-07-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 7       Pages : 1321 - 1324
Int J Microbiol Res 10.7 (2018):1321-1324

Keywords : Lactobacillus reuteri, Laboratory isolate, Probiotic, Hematology, Serum biochemical
Academic Editor : Dr Meesam Raza
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India. Author also thankful to Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Wildlife, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, 176062, Himachal Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation of red jungle fowl specific laboratory isolated Lactobacillus reuteri (LRJFCM30) on hematology and serum biochemistry of broiler chicken. A total 360 CARIBRO-Vishal broiler chicks were weighed individually and randomly allocated to nine treatment groups, each having five replicates with eight chicks in each. The dietary treatments were T1 (basal diet, control), T2 (20 g BMD/100 kg feed), T3 (1 g commercial probiotic/kg feed), T4 (L. reuteri @1x 106 cfu/g/day), T5 (L. reuteri @1x 107 cfu/g/day), T6 (L. reuteri @1x 108 cfu/g/day), T7 (L. reuteri @1x 106 cfu/g/day + 0.1%MOS), T8 (L. reuteri @1x 107 cfu/g/day + 0.1% MOS), and T9 (L. reuteri @1x 108 cfu/g/day + 0.1% MOS). The birds were fed ad libitum for 42 days. The results revealed significant increase (P<0.05) in the serum total protein, albumin, calcium, and phosphors levels, whereas, significant (P<0.05) decrease in the serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides levels were observed in birds fed diet T9 compared to diet T1 and T2, whereas, other dietary treatments yielded intermediate values. No significant dietary effects were observed in serum globulin and albumin: globulin ratio. The hematological parameters viz. total erythrocyte count (TEC), total leucocytes count (TLC), hemoglobin (Hb), and packed cell volume (PCV) were significantly (P<0.05) higher in dietary treatment T9 compared to treatment T1 and T2, whereas, other dietary treatments yielded intermediate values. From the results it can be concluded that the supplementation of laboratory isolated Lactobacillus reuteri @1x108cfu/g/day, along with 0.1% MOS in broiler chicken ration significantly improved the hematological and serum biochemical parameters of broiler chicken.

1. Lilly D.M. and Stillwell R.H. (1965) Science, 147, 747-748.
2. FAO/WHO (2001) American Córdoba Park Hotel, Córdoba, Argentina,1-34.
3. Dalloul R.A., Lillehoj H.S., Shellem T.A. and Doerr J.A. (2003) Poultry Science, 82, 62-66.
4. Yegani M. and Korver D. R. (2008) Poultry Science, 87, 2052-2063.
5. Higgins S.E., Higgins J.P., Wolfenden A.D., Henderson S.N., Torre-Rodriquez A., Tellez G. and Hargis B. (2008) Poultry Science, 87, 27-31.
6. Taheri H. R., Moravej H., Tabandeh F., Zaghari M. and Shivazad M. (2009) Poultry Science, 88, 1586-1593.
7. Lee K., Lillehoj H. S. and Siragusa G.R. (2010) Journal of Poultry Science, 47,106-114.
8. Patterson J. A. and Burkholder K. M. (2003) Ball R.A. (Ed.). Banff, Canada, University of Alberta, 1, 319-331.
9. Mountzouris K.C., Tsirtsikos P., Kalamara E., Nitsch S., Schatzmayr G. and Fegeros K. (2007) Poultry Science, 86 (2), 309-317
10. Fuller R. (1989). Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66, 365-78.
11. Rolfe R. D. (2000) The Journal of Nutrition, 130(2), 396S-402S.
12. Nahashon S.N., Nakaue H.S. & Mirosh L.W. (1994) Poultry Science, 73(11), 1699-1711.
13. Gruzauskas R., Lekavicius R., Raceviciute-Stupeliene A., Sasyte V. & Guarner F. (2004) British Journal of Nutrition, 93(93), 61-5.
14. Al-Kassie G.A.M., Al-Jumaa Y.M.F. & Jameel Y.J. (2008) International Journal of Poultry Science, 7(12), 1182-1184.
15. Siadati S. A., Ebrahimnezhad Y., Salehi Jouzani G. and Shayegh J. (2017) RevistaBrasileira de CiênciaAvícola, 19(3), 399-408.
16. Abd-El-Rahman A.H., Kamel H.H., Ahmed W.M., Mogoda O.S. & Mohamed A.H. (2012) World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(3), 305-316.
17. Arslan C. and Saatci M. (2004) Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 68(4), 160-163.
18. Djouvinov D., Stefanov M., Boicheva S. and Vlaikova T. (2005) Trakia Journal of Sciences, 3, 61-69.
19. Sahin T., Kaya I., Unal Y., Elmali D. A. (2008) Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7, 1370-1373.
20. Alkhalf A., Alhaj M. and Al-homidan I. (2010) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 17, 219-225.
21. Panda A. K., Rao S. V. R., Raju M. V. and Sharma S. R. (2006) The Journal of Poultry Science, 43(3), 235-240.
22. Dibaji S. M., Alireza S., Asadpour L. (2012) Research Opinions in Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2, 10-13.
23. Kalavathy R., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. and Ho Y. W. (2003) British Poultry Science, 44(1), 139-144.
24. Arun K.P., Rao R., Savarm V., Raju Mantena V.L.N. and Sharma Sita R. (2006) Journal of Poultry science, 43, 235-240.
25. Mohan B., Kadirvel M., Bhaskaran M. and Natarajan A. (1995) Br. Poult. Sci., 36,799-803.
26. Abdulrahim S.M., Haddadin M.S.Y., Hashlamoun E.A.R. and Robinson R. K. (1996) British Poultry Science, 37(2), 341-346.
27. Surono I.S. (2003) Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16(5), 726-731.
28. Klaver F.A. & Van der Meer R. (1993) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(4), 1120-1124.
29. Scholz-Ahrens K.E., Ade P., Marten B., Weber P., Timm W., Aςil Y. and Schrezenmeir J. (2007) The Journal of Nutrition, 137(3), 838S-846S.
30. Hosseini Z., Moghadam H.N. and Kermanshahi H. (2013). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(11), 1221.
31. Eizaguirre I., Urkia N.G., Asensio A.B., Zubillaga I., Zubillaga P., Vidales C., Garcia-renzana J.M., Aldazabal P. (2002) Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 37, 699-702.
32. Cetin N., Güçlü B.K. and Cetin E. (2005) Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 52(6), 263-267.
33. Dimcho Djouvinov, Svetlana Boicheva, Tsvetomira Simeonova, Tatiana Vlaikova, (2005) Trakia Journal of Sciences 3, 22-28.
34. Fathi M. (2013) Research Journal of Animal Sciences, 7(4-6), 77-81.
35. Kander M. (2004) Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, 7, 07.
36. Sjaasted Q.V., Franstad T. and Blom A.K. (1996) Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 37, 133-138.