EVALUATION OF BOTANICALS AND BIO-AGENTS AGAINST Rhizoctonia bataticola CAUSING DRY ROOT ROT OF CHICKPEA

JAGDISH KUMAR PATIDAR1*, PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH2, VIVEK KASHYAP3, REETI SINGH4, SATISH PATIDAR5
1Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
2Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
3Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
4Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
5Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : jdsplantpathology@gmail.com

Received : 26-04-2018     Accepted : 15-05-2018     Published : 30-05-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 5       Pages : 1186 - 1190
Int J Microbiol Res 10.5 (2018):1186-1190
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.5.1186-1190

Keywords : Botanicals, Trichoderma, Rhizoctonia bataticola, mycelium growth, Inhibition percentage
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author are thankful to Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474002, Madhya Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : PATIDAR, JAGDISH KUMAR, et al "EVALUATION OF BOTANICALS AND BIO-AGENTS AGAINST Rhizoctonia bataticola CAUSING DRY ROOT ROT OF CHICKPEA." International Journal of Microbiology Research 10.5 (2018):1186-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.5.1186-1190

Cite - APA : PATIDAR, JAGDISH KUMAR, SINGH, PRASHANT KUMAR, KASHYAP, VIVEK, SINGH, REETI, PATIDAR, SATISH (2018). EVALUATION OF BOTANICALS AND BIO-AGENTS AGAINST Rhizoctonia bataticola CAUSING DRY ROOT ROT OF CHICKPEA. International Journal of Microbiology Research, 10 (5), 1186-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.5.1186-1190

Cite - Chicago : PATIDAR, JAGDISH KUMAR, PRASHANT KUMAR SINGH, VIVEK KASHYAP, REETI SINGH, and SATISH PATIDAR. "EVALUATION OF BOTANICALS AND BIO-AGENTS AGAINST Rhizoctonia bataticola CAUSING DRY ROOT ROT OF CHICKPEA." International Journal of Microbiology Research 10, no. 5 (2018):1186-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.5.1186-1190

Copyright : © 2018, JAGDISH KUMAR PATIDAR, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Nine botanicals and seven isolates of Trichoderma Spp. were evaluated by following poison food technique and dual culture technique against Rhizoctonia bataticola. Among the botanicals, maximum mycelium inhibition was recorded in Zingiber officinale rhizome (47.98 %) followed by Datura stramonium leaf (43.35 %), Allium sativum clove (39.74 %) and Eucalyptus Globus leaf (37.86 %). Out of the seven isolates of Trichoderma Spp. tested against Rhizoctonia bataticola, T-6 showed highest inhibition percentage (67.32 %) followed by T-7 (63.61%), T-3 (59.72 %) and T-5 (57.50 %).

References

1. Tekeoglu M., Rajesh N.P. and Muehlbauer F.J. (2002) Theoratical Applied Genetics, 105, 847-854.
2. Anonymous (2013-14) Ministry of Agriculture http://agricoop.nic.in
3. Nene Y.L., Sheila V.K. and Sharma S.B. (1996) A World list of chickpea and pigeonpea pathogens. ICRISAT, 5th edition. 1-27.
4. Pande S. and Sharma M. (2010) In: 5th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRC V) & 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII), Antalya, Turkey.
5. Delvin J. F. and Zettel T. (1999) Ecoagriculture: Initiatives in Eastern and Southern Africa. Weaver Press, Harare
6. Grange N. and Ahmed S. (1988) Handbook of Plants with Pest Control Properties. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. Roy B., Amin R., Uddin M. N., Islam A. T. M. S., Islam M. J. and Halder B. C. (2005) Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(2), 201-204.
8. Vincent J. M. (1947) Nature, 150 - 850.
9. Chet I. and Henis Y. (1972) J. Gen. Microbol., 73, 483-486.
10. Punja Z.K. (1985) Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 23, 97-127.
11. Wink M. (1993) In Methods in Plant Biochemistry, London: Academic Press (Waterman, P.G., ed), 7, 197-240.
12. Duke S.O., Dayan F.E., Romagni J.G., Rimando A.M. (2000) Weed Research, 40(1), 99-111.
13. Mandhare V.K. and Suryawanshi A. V. (2009) J. Pl. Dis. Sci., 4(1), 128-129.
14. Kane P.V., Kshirsagar C.R., Jadhav A.C. and Pawar N.B. (2002) J. Maharastra Agric. Univ., 27(1),101-102.
15. Ammajamma R., Hegde Y.R.., Lingaraju S., Sreedevi S.C. and Hegde Laxminarayana (2009) Biomed., 4(1),28-32.
16. Mallesh S.B., Narendrappa T. and Satish D. (2008) International J. of Pl. Sci., 3(1): 82-86.
17. Mandhare V.K. and Suryawanshi A.V. (2008) J. Food Legu., 21(2),122-124.
18. More P.S. and Parate R.L. (2016) Int. J. Pl. Protec., 9(2), 469-473.
19. Bandyopadhyay S., Sharma N.D. and Dutta, S. (2003) Ann. Pl. Protec. Sci., 11, 163-165.
20. Paul Y.S., Devi M. and Kapoor A.S. (2008) J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 38 (3), 571-576.
21. Kaushal R.P. (2008) J. Food Legume, 21 (3), 178-181.
22. Maruti, Savitha A. S., Gururaj S. and Amaresh Y. S. (2017) Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 5 (6), 1341-1347.