GENETIC CONFIRMATION OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES (Vigna radiata L. WILCZEK) USING MOLECULAR MARKERS

ANAMIKA NATH1*, S.R. MALOO2, DEVENDRA JAIN3, SRIKANTA NATH4, ASHIM CHAKMA5, RAJANI VERMA6
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan
2Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan
3Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan
4Department of Agriculture, O/o The Supdt. Of Agriculture, Govt. of Tripura, Gandacherra, 799284, Tripura
5Department of Agriculture, O/o The Supdt. Of Agriculture, Govt. of Tripura, Gandacherra, 799284, Tripura
6Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan
* Corresponding Author : anamikanath22@gmail.com

Received : 31-03-2018     Accepted : 05-04-2018     Published : 15-04-2018
Volume : 10     Issue : 3       Pages : 365 - 369
Genetics 10.3 (2018):365-369
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-2862.10.3.365-369

Keywords : Mungbean, RAPD Marker, ISSR Markers, and yield components
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The Author thankful to department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr S. R. Maloo, Former Dean, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan for help in conducting the research work successfully.
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : NATH, ANAMIKA, et al "GENETIC CONFIRMATION OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES (Vigna radiata L. WILCZEK) USING MOLECULAR MARKERS." International Journal of Genetics 10.3 (2018):365-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-2862.10.3.365-369

Cite - APA : NATH, ANAMIKA, MALOO, S.R., JAIN, DEVENDRA, NATH, SRIKANTA, CHAKMA, ASHIM, VERMA, RAJANI (2018). GENETIC CONFIRMATION OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES (Vigna radiata L. WILCZEK) USING MOLECULAR MARKERS. International Journal of Genetics, 10 (3), 365-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-2862.10.3.365-369

Cite - Chicago : NATH, ANAMIKA, S.R. MALOO, DEVENDRA JAIN, SRIKANTA NATH, ASHIM CHAKMA, and RAJANI VERMA. "GENETIC CONFIRMATION OF MUNGBEAN GENOTYPES (Vigna radiata L. WILCZEK) USING MOLECULAR MARKERS." International Journal of Genetics 10, no. 3 (2018):365-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.9735/0975-2862.10.3.365-369

Copyright : © 2018, ANAMIKA NATH, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to identify the genetic variation present among different mungbean genotypes. Out of 25 RAPD primers only 17 were amplified. A total of 104 amplified bands, 91 polymorphic, 13 monomorphic bands and 88 % polymorphism. A total of 112 amplified bands were obtained from 18 ISSR primers, out of which 88 polymorphic. The average number of bands per primer was 6.22 and average numbers of polymorphic bands per primer 4.89. The RAPD and ISSR data were evaluated to obtain a combined similarity matrix and cluster tree analysis. The similarity coefficient values lay between 0.46-0.68 and cluster tree analysis showed that the eight genotypes could be divided into 4 clusters. The genotype BM-4 was grouped in separate VI cluster and PDM-139 was grouped on cluster IIA. In the light of RAPD and ISSR study the parents of the cross BM-4 x PDM-139 noticed for their genetic diversity. Here validation of these data compared with phenotypic character in the field and revealed that cross BM-4 x PDM-139 turned out to be the most promising on the basis of its high per se performance and also for their high genetic diversity.

References

1. Kannaiyan S. (1999) Bioresources Technology for Sustainable Agriculture, Associated Publishing Company, New Delhi, 422.
2. Singh G., Kapoor S. and Singh K. (1988) AVRDC, VI, 290-296.
3. Thirumaran A. S. and Seralathan M. A. (1988) Proceeding of the second international symposium. Taiwan, AVRDC, 470-485.
4. Gunter L.E., Tuskan G.A. and Wullschleger S.D. (1996) Current Science, 36, 1017-1022.
5. Lashermes P., Trouslot P., Anthony F., Combes M.C. and Charrier A. (1996) Euphytica, 87, 59-64.
6. Bouchired N. (1997) 3rd International Symposium on Mineral Nutrition of Deciduous Fruit Tree, Acta Horticulturae, 448.
7. Colombo C., Second G. and Charrier A. (2000) Genetics and Molecular Biology, 23, 189-199.
8. Mullis K.B., Faloona F.A., Scharf S., Saiki R., Horn G. and Erlich H. (1986) Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Quantitative Biology, 51, 263 – 273.
9. Mullis K.B. and Faloona F.A. (1987) Methods of Enzymology, 255, 335 – 50.
10. Kanazin V., Marek L. and Shoemaker R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93, 11746-11750.
11. Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. L. (1987) Phytochemical Bulletin, 19,11-15.
12. Rohlf F.J. (1993) NTSYS-PC. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, New York
13. Nisar M., Ghafoor H., Ahmad K. M., Rashid A. S., Qureshi H. and Ali H. (2008) Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40(5), 2081-2088.
14. Karuppanapandian T., Karuppudurai T., Sinha P.B., Haniya A.H. and Manoharan K. (2006) African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 1214-1219.
15. Reddy M.P., Sarla N. and Siddiq E.A. (2002) Euphytica, 128, 9-17.
16. Khamassi K., Khoufi S., Chaabane R., Da Silva J. A. T. and Naceur M. B. (2011) International Journal of Plant Breeding, 12, 141-145.
17. Das S. (Sur), Das S. S. and Ghosh P. (2014) Advances in Applied Science Research, 5, 93-97
18. Datta S., Gangwar S., Kumar S., Gupta S., Rai R., Kaashyap M., Singh P., Chaturvedi S.K., Singh B.B. and Nadarajan N. (2012) American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3, 1085-1091.
19. Saini M., Singh S. Hussain Z. and Sikka V.K. (2010) Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 09, 276-282.
20. Singh R., Heusden A. W. V. and Yadav R. C. (2011) African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(47), 6574- 6582.
21. Tantasawat P., Trongchuen J., Prajongjai T., Thongpae T., Petkhum C., Seehalak W. and Machikowa T. (2010) African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 4152-4164.
22. Undal V. S., Thakare P. V., Chaudhari U. S., Deshmukh V. P. and Gawande P. A. (2011) Annals of Biological Research, 2, 348-354.
23. Chattopadhyay K., Ali M.N., Sarkar H.K., Mandal N. and Bhattacharyya S. (2005) Indian Journal Genetics, 65, 172-175.
24. Datta J. and Lal N. (2011) Advanced Biotech, 11, 39-44.
25. Singh M., Devi E. L., Aglawe S., Kousar N. and Behera C. (2013) The Bioscan., 8(4), 1393-1401.
26. Pratap N., Shekhar R., Singh P. K. and Soni S. K. (2013) The Bioscan, 8(4), 1521-1528.
27. Singh R. Heusden A. W. van and Yadav R. C. (2013) African Journal of Biotechnology, 12,6574-6582.
28. Bhareti P., Singh D. P. and Khulbe R. K. (2012) Journal of Food Legumes, 25, 89-93.
29. Dikshit H. K., Sharma T. R., Singh B. B. and Kumari J. (2009) Journal of Genetics, 88, 341-344.
30. Lavanya G.R., Srivastava J. and Ranade S.A. (2008) Journal of Genetics, 87, 65–74.
31. Singh S. K., Suresh B. G. Lavanya G. R., Lalit Arya Bhat K. V., Hussain Z. and Verma M. (2014) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84, 534-539.