INOCULATION EFFECT OF EFFICIENT BACTERIAL K-ISOLATES AND LEVELS OF MINERAL K ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY IN RHIZOSPHERE OF MAIZE (Zea mays L) AT DIFFERENT GROWTH PERIODS

INDRA BAHADUR1*, BIHARI RAM MAURYA2
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India
2Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India
* Corresponding Author : ibm07025@gmail.com

Received : 09-01-2017     Accepted : 03-06-2017     Published : 28-06-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 6       Pages : 899 - 901
Int J Microbiol Res 9.6 (2017):899-901

Keywords : Efficient bacterial isolates, Enzymatic activity, Rhizosphere, maize, Bacterial K-isolates
Academic Editor : Jagdish Lavanya
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Sincere thanks to Head, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University. Indra Bahadur thankful to University Grants Commission (UGC, New Delhi), Government of India (GOI) for Doctoral Fellowship
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : BAHADUR, INDRA and MAURYA, BIHARI RAM "INOCULATION EFFECT OF EFFICIENT BACTERIAL K-ISOLATES AND LEVELS OF MINERAL K ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY IN RHIZOSPHERE OF MAIZE (Zea mays L) AT DIFFERENT GROWTH PERIODS ." International Journal of Microbiology Research 9.6 (2017):899-901.

Cite - APA : BAHADUR, INDRA, MAURYA, BIHARI RAM (2017). INOCULATION EFFECT OF EFFICIENT BACTERIAL K-ISOLATES AND LEVELS OF MINERAL K ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY IN RHIZOSPHERE OF MAIZE (Zea mays L) AT DIFFERENT GROWTH PERIODS . International Journal of Microbiology Research, 9 (6), 899-901.

Cite - Chicago : BAHADUR, INDRA and BIHARI RAM, MAURYA. "INOCULATION EFFECT OF EFFICIENT BACTERIAL K-ISOLATES AND LEVELS OF MINERAL K ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY IN RHIZOSPHERE OF MAIZE (Zea mays L) AT DIFFERENT GROWTH PERIODS ." International Journal of Microbiology Research 9, no. 6 (2017):899-901.

Copyright : © 2017, INDRA BAHADUR and BIHARI RAM MAURYA, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Soil microorganisms constitute the largest section of living things with varying potential in its habitat, biochemical, physiological processes and nutritional characteristics. They play an important role in remediation, biomedicine, environmental and agricultural area. Current trends in agriculture are focused on reduction of the use of chemical fertilizers and use of alternative ways to improve crop yield in a sustainable manner. JHK2 showed the maximum activity with 60 kg K2O ha-1 and it was at par with the activity of BRG 6. The experimental treatments had a significant impact on rhizosphere soil enzyme activity. When K was applied @ 60 kg K2O ha-1, the urease activity of JHK2 and JHG11 was at par to each other. Application of 40 kg K2O ha-1 of K, APN7 and RJJ4 resulted similar activities. Increasing the level from 20 to 60 kg K2O ha-1, RJJ 4 was found maximum activity. When K was applied @ 40 kg K2O ha-1, RJJ 4 and JHG 11 showed similar activity and 14.63% higher activity than control. In the entire crop period, the alkaline phosphatase activity increased initially at 30 DAS and then declined with the age of the crop

References

1. Meena V.S., Maurya B.R. and Verma J.P. (2015) Microbiological Research, 169, 337–347.
2. Bahadur I., Meena V.S. and Kumar S. (2014) International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(12), 80-85.
3. Saha M., Maurya B.R., Meena V.S., Bahadur I. and Kumar A. (2016) Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 7, 202–209.
4. Singh G., Biswas D.R. and Marwaha T.S. (2010) Journal of plant nutrition, 33(8), 1236-1251.
5. Maurya B.R., Meena V.S. and Meena O.P. (2014) Vegetos, 27(1), 181–187.
6. Zhang C. and Kong F. (2014) Applied Soil Ecology, 82, 18–25.
7. Bahadur I., Maurya B.R., Meena V.S., Saha M., Kumar A. and Aeron A. (2016) Geomicrobiology Journal, DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2016.1219431.
8. Meena V.S., Maurya B.R., Verma J.P., Aeron A., Kumar A., Kim K. and Bajpai V.K. (2016) Ecological Engineering, 81, 340–347.
9. Page A.L., Miller R.H. and Keeney D.R. (1982) American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI., USA.
10. Casida L., Klein D. and Santoro T. (1964) Soil Science 98, 371-376.
11. Tabatabai M.A. and Bremner J.M. (1969) Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1, 301-307.
12. Mc-Garity J.W. and Myers M.C. (1967) Plant and Soil, 27, 217-223.
13. Gomez K.A. and Gomez A.A. (1984) John Wiley and sons, Inc. London, U.K (2nd edtn) 13-175.
14. Nihorimbere V., Ongena M., Smargiassi M. and Thonart P. (2011) Biotechnology Agronomy Social and Environment, 15(2), 327–337.
15. Das B.B. and Dakhar M.S. (2011) American European Journal Agriculture and Environmental Science, 10(2), 140–150.
16. Manjunath B. (2006) Impact of farmer’s organic farming practices on soil properties in northern dry zone of Karnataka. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences.
17. Chendraya K., Adhya J. K and Sethunathan N. (1980) Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 12, 271-273.
18. Nannipieri P., Grego S., Ceccanti B., Bollag J. and Stotzky G. (1990) Soil Biochemistry, 6, 293–355.
19. Dotaniya M.L., Datta S.C., Biswas D.R. and Meena B.P.(2013) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Section-B, 83(3), 305–309.
20. Alam S., Khalil S., Ayub N. and Rashid M. (2002) International Journal of Agricultural Biology, 4, 454–458.
21. Baudin E., Benizri E. and Guckert A. (2002) Applied Soil Ecological, 19, 135–145.
22. Sugiyama A. and Yazaki K. (2012) Springer, Heidelberg, pp 27–48.
23. Singaram P. and Kamalakumari K. (1995) Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 43, 378-381.
24. Dotaniya M.L. (2012) Lap Lambert Academic Publisher, Saarbrucken, p 116.