STUDY OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION (PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION)

R.O. BRAHMANE1*, R.W. BHARUD2, D.V. DESHMUKH3
1Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ahmednagar, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413722, India
2Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ahmednagar, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413722, India
3Department of Botany, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ahmednagar, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413722, India
* Corresponding Author : ramesh.brahmane@yahoo.com

Received : 20-04-2017     Accepted : 27-04-2017     Published : 28-04-2017
Volume : 9     Issue : 4       Pages : 266 - 270
Genetics 9.4 (2017):266-270

Keywords : Soil moisture status, Crop phenology, Dry matter accumulation, Yield contributing characters
Academic Editor : Paviter Kaur
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Author thankful to Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Ahmednagar, India
Author Contribution : All author equally contributed

Cite - MLA : BRAHMANE, R.O., et al "STUDY OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION (PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION)." International Journal of Genetics 9.4 (2017):266-270.

Cite - APA : BRAHMANE, R.O., BHARUD, R.W., DESHMUKH, D.V. (2017). STUDY OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION (PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION). International Journal of Genetics, 9 (4), 266-270.

Cite - Chicago : BRAHMANE, R.O., R.W. BHARUD, and D.V. DESHMUKH. "STUDY OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION (PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF GROWTH AND YIELD VARIATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITION)." International Journal of Genetics 9, no. 4 (2017):266-270.

Copyright : © 2017, R.O. BRAHMANE, et al, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Six chickpea genotypes were evaluated for growth and yield variation under moisture stress condition during Rabi-2011 and 2012. Separate experiments were conducted under rainout shelter condition for moisture stress, mild stress and non-stress in split plot design with three replications. Observations were recorded on moisture status at 15 days interval. The per cent available moisture content was reduced and severity duration frequency (SDF) was increased with the advancing age of the crop. The initiation of flowering and 50% flowering was unaffected however the maturity period was declined due to moisture stress and mild stress condition in all the genotypes. The genotypes Vijay and Digvijay were earlier, whereas, PG-5 and Chaffa were late for days to initiation of flowering, 50% flowering and maturity under all the conditions. Vijay and Digvijay maintained higher dry matter accumulation in component parts of plant under different growing conditions at various stages of growth. The bold seed size genotypes Digvijay and Vishal and medium bold Vijay were promising in respect of yield and yield contributing characters under different growing conditions. Therefore, these genotypes might be considered as drought tolerant types.

References

1. Guha Sarkar C. K., Srivastava P. S. L. and Deshmukh P. S. (2001) Indian J. Genet., 61(3), 209-212.
2. Koinov G. and Vitkov M. (1976) Rasteniev dni Nauki, 13(8): 59-62.
3. Kumar P., Deshmukh P.S., Kushwaha S.R. Sunita Kumari P., Kumar and Kumari S. (2001) Annals of Agric. Res., 22(3), 48-51.
4. Kumar S. and Sinha S. K. (1988) The Society of Physiol. and Biochem., pp 21-42.
5. Nanda R. and Saini A.D. (1992) Indian J. Plant Physiol., 3591, 16-24.
6. Panse V.G. and Sukhatme P.V. (1985) Statistical Methods of Agricultural Workers, ICAR Publ., New Delhi (4 Edn.).
7. Rahangaldale S. L., Dhopte A. M. and Wanjari K. P. (1994) Annl. Pl. Physiol., 8(2), 179-189.
8. Saxena N.P., Krishnamurthy L. and Johansen C. (1993) Crop Sci., 33(6), 14-24.
9. Silim S.N. and Saxena M.C. (1993) Field Crop Res., 34(2), 137-146.