M. SRINIVASA REDDY1*, G.M. LAL2, V. SIVA KRISHNA3, MD OMAIR SUBHAN4
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : medagamsrinivasareddy5@gmail.com
Received : 02-11-2020 Accepted : 26-11-2020 Published : 30-11-2020
Volume : 12 Issue : 11 Pages : 784 - 786
Genetics 12.11 (2020):784-786
Keywords : Black gram, Variability, Heritability, Genetic advance, Correlation coefficient, Path analysis
Academic Editor : Dr Vijay Prajapati, Dr Vipul N Kapadia
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, 211007, Uttar Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed
The present investigation on variability parameters, correlation and path analysis for different characteristics in germplasm of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) was undertaken during Summer-2019. Evaluation of 30 genotypes revealed moderate genetic advance as % of mean for no. of primary branches/plant, and grain yield per plant, therefore, selection may be effective for these characters. Number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod at genotypic as well as phenotypic level showed positive significant correlation with seed yield per plant. Days to 50% flowering, number of branches per plant, 100 seed weight, harvest index showed positive direct effect on seed yield per plant at phenotypic and genotypic level
1. Prakash V. (2006) Crop Improvement, 32(2), 175-180.
2. Narasimhulu, R., Naidu N.V., ShanthiPriya M., Rajarajeswari V. and Reddy K.H.P. (2013) Indian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2(3), 82-86.
3. Konda C.R., Salimath P.M. and Mishra M.N. (2008) Legume Research, 31 (3), 202-205.
4. Kadam G.R. Kalyankar S.N., Borg, Aonkar S.B. Sasamkar S.S. and Kadam B.P. (2008) Int. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3 (2), 409-410.
5. Haritha S. and Sekhar M. R. (2002) Legume Research, 25, 180-183.
6. Prasanna B. L., Rao P. J. M., Murthy K. G. K. and Prakash K. K. (2013) Environment and Ecology, 31(4), 1782-1788.
7. Kumar G.V., Vanaja M., Sathish P., Vagheera P. and Lakhsmi N. J. (2015) International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5 (4), 2250-3153.