NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTING IN BLOOD SCREENING: RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF 5 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

K.S. MURTHY1, C. PRAGATI2*
1Managing Director, Dhanwantari Voluntary Blood Bank & Blood Components, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry, 533103, Andhra Pradesh, India
2Professor, Department of Microbiology, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, 533296, Dr NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, 520004, Andhra Pradesh, India
* Corresponding Author : ch.pragatisb@gmail.com

Received : 02-03-2020     Accepted : 27-03-2020     Published : 30-03-2020
Volume : 12     Issue : 3       Pages : 1794 - 1797
Int J Microbiol Res 12.3 (2020):1794-1797

Keywords : Transfusion transmitted infections, MP-NAT, ELISA
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to Professor, Department of Microbiology, GSL Medical College & General Hospital, Rajahmundry, 533296, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, 520004, Andhra Pradesh, India
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Cite - MLA : MURTHY, K.S. and PRAGATI , C. "NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTING IN BLOOD SCREENING: RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF 5 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ." International Journal of Microbiology Research 12.3 (2020):1794-1797.

Cite - APA : MURTHY, K.S., PRAGATI , C. (2020). NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTING IN BLOOD SCREENING: RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF 5 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE . International Journal of Microbiology Research, 12 (3), 1794-1797.

Cite - Chicago : MURTHY, K.S. and C., PRAGATI . "NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTING IN BLOOD SCREENING: RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF 5 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ." International Journal of Microbiology Research 12, no. 3 (2020):1794-1797.

Copyright : © 2020, K.S. MURTHY and C. PRAGATI, Published by Bioinfo Publications. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs) is high in India. The aim of our study was to evaluate the sero-prevalence of TTIs in blood bank at Rajahmundry (Andhra Pradesh, India) since 2010. Materials and Methods: A total 89,639 units of blood donated at our blood bank till date. The sero-prevalence for HIV, HBV and HCV was tested by 4th generation ELISA. Only sero-negative samples were tested on mini pool nucleic acid test (MP-NAT) to detect HIV1, HIV2, HCV and HBV viral nucleic acids. Combined NAT yield was calculated and compared the NAT yield with MPX test and MPX V2.0. We also evaluated the optical density (OD) values of ELISA for MP-NAT reactive donor samples to evaluate the efficacy of NAT in detecting window period cases. Results: The overall sero-prevalence of TTIs was 2.41% and HBV was predominantly present (66%). Total 29 ELISA negative blood donor samples were found reactive on NAT. All NAT reactive donors were of HBV only. Out of 29 cases, 12 were detected by MPX test from 26,008 donations and 17 by MPX V2.0 from 25,619 donations, providing NAT yield of 1:2169 and 1:1507 respectively. OD and Signal cut off values of ELISA for NAT reactive samples were found to be much below extended grey zone value (<0.3). Conclusion: Additional testing of nucleic acids by MP-NAT in combination of mandated primary serology by ELISA provides 99.99% of safe blood to needy patients; thus significantly reduces the risk of TTIs by identifying the window period cases.

References

1. Kaur P. and Basu P. (2005) J Postgard Med., 51,146-151.
2. Morsi H.A. (2011) Journal of the Egyptian Society of Hematology & Research, 7(2), 1-5.
3. Zou S., Stramer S.L., Notari E.P., et al. (2009) Transfusion, 49,1609-20.
4. Zou S., Dorsey K.A., Notari E.P., et al. (2010) Transfusion, 50, 1495-504.
5. http//www.saatm.org accessed on 27 October 2016.
6. http//www.naco.gov.in as accessed on 27 October 2016.
7. Comanor L., Holland P. (2006) Vox Sang, 91,1-12.
8. Busch M.P., Glynn S., Stramer S., Strong D.M., Caglioti S. and Wright D. (2005) Transfusion, 45, 254-64.
9. Leena M.S., Mohd. Shafee (2012) Journal of Pathology of Nepal, 2, 203-06.
10. Shah N., Shah J.M., Javeeri P., Patel K., Shah C.K., Shah N.R. (2013) Gujarat Medical Journal, 68 (2), 35-39.
11. Chandra T., Rizvi N.F. and Agarwal D. (2014) Scientific World Journal, 1-4.
12. Sethi B., Kumar S., Butola K.S., Mishra J.P., Kumar Y. (2014) Internet Journal of Medical Update, 9(1),10-15.
13. Khan M.I., Khan T., Vaghela M. (2015) J Cont Med A Dent, 3(2),17-21.
14. Patel P. (2014) Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University, 7(5), 620-24.
15. Mahapatra S., Ray G. and Bhuyan P. (2016) EC Bacteriology and Virology Research, 2.1, 49-53.
16. Said Z. N. A. (2011) World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17(15), 1927-1938.
17. https//www.cdc.gov as accessed on 22 December 2016.
18. Veldhuijzen I.K., Smits L.J., van de Laar M.J. (2005) Epidemiol Infect.,133(1),113-9.
19. Jain R., Aggarwal P., and Gupta G. (2012) International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Hematology, Article ID 718671, 5 pages.
20. Tulika Chandra S., Nishat F.R., Agarwal D. (2016) International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 3(6),1818-1821.
21. Chandrashekar S. (2014) Asian J Transfus Sci., 8(1), 35-8.
22. cobasĀ® TaqScreen MPX Test, version 2.0-Information for Use document (Package insert)
23. cobasĀ® TaqScreen MPX Test-Information for Use document (Package insert)
24. Bhattacharya P., Kaur R. (2013) Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 7(2),107-108.
25. Kim S., Kim J.H., Yoon S., Park Y.H., Kim H.S. (2008) J Clin. Microbiol., 46(12), 3919-23.