EXPLOITING THE PEARL MILLET GENETIC DIVERSITY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF IRON AND ZINC DENSE SEED PARENTAL LINES

M.K. BERWAL¹*, L.K. CHUGH², P. GOYAL³, RAMESH KUMAR^4
1ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture, Bikaner, 33400, India
²CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar, Haryana, 125001, India
³ICAR-Central Institute for Arid Horticulture, Bikaner, 33400, India
⁴CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar, Haryana, 125001, India
* Corresponding Author : mkbiochem@gmail.com

Received : 24-04-2019     Accepted : 15-05-2019     Published : 30-05-2019
Volume : 11     Issue : 5       Pages : 583 - 586
Genetics 11.5 (2019):583-586

Keywords : Pearl Millet, Iron, Zinc, Biofortification, Seed Parents
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : Authors are thankful to ICRISAT, Hyderabad for providing the EDXRF facility for analyzing the micronutrient content. Authors are also thankful to CCS Haryana Agricultural University Hisar, Haryana, 125001
Author Contribution : All authors equally contributed

Micronutrient malnutrition has been recognized as massive health issue, affecting over two billion people, mostly women, children and infants worldwide especially in developing countries. Agricultural approaches including crop based food products and micronutrient (Fe and Zn) biofortified crop cultivars can provide the most cost effective and sustainable solution for this problem. Micronutrient bio-fortification in agricultural crops can be done with conventional breeding strategies, because traits for micronutrient enrichment exist within their genomes and can be used for considerable micronutrient levels in food grain crops without any significant negative impact on crop productivity. In the efforts to address this problem, pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R.Br.), field trials were conducted during kharif 2013 and 2014, to investigate the magnitude of variation in Fe and Zn contents. Composition of the genotypes tested was not affected to an appreciable extent by the growing season. During kharif 2013 and 2014, Fe content in 92 diverse genotypes (Inbreds and B-lines) varied from 23 to 123 mg/kg and 28 to 101 mg/ kg while Zn content varied from 26 to 72 mg/kg and 34 to 70 mg/kg. The correlation co-efficient between Fe and Zn content was positive and highly significant (r =0.523 to 0.702, p<0.01) during both the seasons, indicating likely usefulness of simultaneous improvement of both the micronutrients. Four promising parental lines (HMS 53B, HMS 40b HMS14B and DPHBL 11-123) with >85 mg/kg grain Fe and >55 mg/kg grain Zn content, have the potential to be used as seed parents for development of Fe and Zn biofortified pearl millet hybrids or composites.

1. Welch R.M., Graham R.D. (2004) Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 353–364.
2. White P.J., Broadley M.R. (2009) New Phytologist, 182, 49-84.
3. WHO (2001) Geneva, Switzerland: UNICEF, United Nations University, WHO.
4. McLean E., Cogswell M., Egli I., Wojdyla D., de Benoist B. (2009) Public Health Nutrition 12, 444–454
5. WHO (2012) The World Health Report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
6. WHO/FAO (2006) Guidelines on Food Fortification with micronutrients. Allen L, de Benoist B, Dary O, Hurrell R, eds. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization.
7. Velu G., Rai K.N., Sahrawat K.L. (2008b) ICRISAT eJournal, 6, 1-4.
8. Adekunle A.A. (2012) Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa, Ghana. ISBN 978-99888373, 2-4.
9. Parthasarathy Rao P., Birthal P.S., Reddy B.V.S., Rai K.N., Ramesh S. (2006) Diagnostics of sorghum and pearl millet based nutrition in India. 47, 93-93.
10. ICRISAT (2013) New Letter pp. 1-8.
11. The Hindu (2018) https://www.thehindu.com. June 06, 2018.
12. Finkelstein J.L., Mehta S., Udipi A.S., et al. (2015) Journal of Nutrition, 1-6.
13. Abdella A.N., Tinay A.H., Mohamad B.E., Abdalla (1998) Food Chemistry, 63(2), 243-246.
14. Nithya K.S., Ramachandramurty B., Krishnamoorthy V.V. (2006) Journal of Applied Science and Research, 2(12), 1164-1168.
15. Velu G., Rai K.N., Muralidharan V. et al (2007) Crop Improvement, 126, 182-185.
16. Velu G., Rai K.N., Sahrawat K.L. (2008a) Crop Improvement, 35(2), 186-91.
17. Paltridge N.G., Milham P.J., Ortiz-Monasterio J.I., et al. (2012) Plant and Soil, 361, 261-269.
18. Panse V.G., Sukhatme P.V. (1957) Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 17, 312-328.
19. Jambunathan R., Subramanian V. (1988) (J.M.J. de Wet & T.A. Preston, Eds.). ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.