ISSN : 0975-5276
EISSN : 0975-9174
IGOR DANIEL ALVES RIBEIRO1, BRUNO FRANCESCO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIR2*, ARIANA ALVES RODRIGUES3, MARCUS VINICIUS FORZANI4, JOSE DANIEL GONCALVES VIEIRA5
1Nucleus of Agricultural Microbiology, Department of Genetics, Institute of Biosciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501970, Brazil
2Laboratory of Molecular and Marine Bacteriology, Institute of Microbiology Paulo de Góes, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 74690900, Brazil
3Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, 74605050
4Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, 74605050
5Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Goias, 74605050
* Corresponding Author : bfro.francesco@gmail.com
Received : 22-08-2019 Accepted : 17-04-2019 Published : 30-04-2019
Volume : 11 Issue : 4 Pages : 1528 - 1533
Int J Microbiol Res 11.4 (2019):1528-1533
Keywords : Endophyte¸ Plant-growth promotion, Rhizosphere, Streptomyces
Conflict of Interest : None declared
Acknowledgements/Funding : The authors would like to thank the collection of rhizospheric soil, Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC) for donating the F. moniliforme strain used in antagonism assays. AAR and MVFA were recipients of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES) scholarships.
Author Contribution : IDAR conceived the study, standardized assay conditions and produced the main work results, along with BFRO. BFRO wrote the manuscript. AAR supervised the molecular identification and was responsible for phylogenetic analyses and 16S rRNA gene sequences s
The phylum Actinobacteria stands out in the symbiotic relationship between plant and microorganism, due to its diversity of hydrolases, important in the colonization and, in the production of molecules that help the host, as phytohormones. The aim of this study was to evaluate the endophytic and rhizosphere actinobacteria in terms of their ability to promote plant growth. A total of 9 actinobacterial strains, 4 from sugarcane rhizosphere and 5 endophytes of field mallow and Neem, were tested to produce indole acetic acid (IAA), solubilization of phosphate and zinc, ammonia and hydrocyanic acid production, production of cellulases, antagonism activity against phytopathogen Fusarium moliniforme and the capacity to grow under nitrogen absence. Three isolates, NIM3, FA9K1 and FA8K4, showed the best results in the assays and were identified as Streptomyces sp. Therewith, the results were promising in the search of actinobacterial inoculants.
1. Vorholt J. A. (2012) Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(12), 828-840.
2. Gaiero J.R., McCall C.A., Thompson K.A., Day N.J., Best A.S. and Dunfield K.E. (2013) American Journal of Botany, 100(9), 1738-1750.
3. Santoyo G., Moreno-Hagelsieb G., Orozco-Mosqueda M.D.C. and Glick B.R. (2016) Microbiological Research, 183, 92-99.
4. De La Torre-Ruiz N., Ruiz-Valdiviezo V.M., Rincón-Molina C.I., Rodríguez-Mendiola M., Arias-Castro C., Gutiérrez-Miceli F.A., Palomeque-Dominguez H. and Rincón-Rosales R. (2016) Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 47(3), 587-596.
5. Turner T.R., James E.K. and Poole P.S. (2013) Genome Biology, 14(6), 209.
6. Chaparro J.M., Badri D.V. and Vivanco J.M. (2014) The ISME Journal, 8(4), 790-803.
7. Golinska P., Wypij M., Agarkar G., Rathod D., Dahm H. and Rai, M. (2015) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 108(2), 267–289.
8. Seipke R.F., Kaltenpoth M. and Hutchings M. I. (2012) FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 36(4), 862-876.
9. Hamedi J. and Mohammadipanah F. (2015) Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 42(2), 157-171.
10. Sabaratnam, S. and Traquair J. A. (2002) Biological Control, 23(3), 245-253.
11. Sathya A., Vijayabharathi R. and Gopalakrishnan S. (2017) 3 Biotech, 7(2), 1-10.
12. Sardi P., Saracchi M., Quaroni S., Petrolini B., Borgonovi G.E. and Merli, S. (1992) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58(8), 2691-2693.
13. Cao L., Qiu Z., You J., Tan H. and Zhou S. (2004) Letters in Applied Microbiology, 39(5), 425-430.
14. Coombs J.T., Michelsen P.P. and Franco C.M. (2004) Biological Control, 29(3), 359-366.
15. Tokala R.K., Strap J.L., Jung C.M., Crawford D.L., Salove M.H., Deobald L.A., Bailey J.F. and Morra M.J. (2002) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(5), 2161-2171.
16. Doumbou C. L., Hamby-Salove M. K., Crawford D. L. and Beaulieu C. (2001) Phytoprotection, 82(3), 85-102.
17. Viaene T., Langendries S., Beirinckx S., Maes M. and Goormachtig S. (2016) FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(8), 1-10.
18. Sousa J.A.J. and Olivares F.L. (2016) Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 3(24), 1-12.
19. Araújo L.W., Lima A.O.S, Azevedo J.L., Marconi J., Sobral J.K. and Lacava P.T. (2002) USP, 86
20. Mendes R., Pizzirani-Kleiner A.A., Araujo W.L. and Raaijmakers J.M. (2007) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(22), 7259-7267.
21. Carrim A.J.I., Barbosa E.C. and Vieira J.D.G. (2006) Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 49(3), 353-359.
22. Rodrigues A.A., Araújo M.V.F., Soares R.D.S., Sibov S.T. and Vieira, J.D.G. (2016) Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 46(2), 149-158.
23. Rodrigues A.A., Araújo M.V.F., Soares R.D.S., Oliveira B.F.R., Sibov S.T. and Vieira J.D.G. (2018) International Journal of Microbiology Research, 10(5), 1193-1198.
24. Shirling E.B. and Gottlieb D. (1966) International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 16, 313-340.
25. Nimnoi P., Pongslip N. and Lumyong S. (2010) World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 26, 193-203.
26. Goudjal Y., Toumatia O., Sabaou N., Barakate M., Mathieu F. and Zitouni A. (2013) World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 29(10), 1821-1829.
27. Gordon S.A. and Weber R.P. (1951) Plant Physiology 26, 192 -195.
28. Bapiri A., Asgharzadeh A., Mujallali H., Khavazi K. and Pazira, E. (2012) Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 16(3), 295-298.
29. Nautiyal C.S. (1999) FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170, 265-270.
30. Pikovskaya R. I. (1948) Mikrobiologiya, 17, 362–370.
31. Lira-Cadete L., Farias A.R.B., Ramos A.P.S., Costa D.P., Freire F.J. and Kuklinsky-Sobral J. (2012) Bioscience Journal, 28(1), 122-129.
32. Nosrati R., Owlia P., Saderi H., Rasooli I. and Malboobi M.A. (2014) Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 6, 285-295.
33. Cappuccino J.G. and Sherman N. (1996) The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, 208.
34. Walpola B.C. and Yoon M. (2013) African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7, 3534-3541
35. Khamna S., Yokota A. and Lumyong, S. (2009) World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 25(4), 649-655.
36. Dobereiner J., Marriel I.E. and Nery M. (1976) Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 22(10), 1464-1473.
37. Kasana R.C., Salwan R., Dhar H., Dutt S. and Gulati A. (2008) Current Microbiology, 57(5), 503-507.
38. Kim M., Morrison M. and Yu, Z. (2011) Journal of Microbiological Methods, 84(1), 81-87.
39. Silva F.A.S. and Azevedo, C.A.V. (2016) African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(39), 3733-3740
40. Passari A. K., Chandra P., Mishra V.K., Leo V.V., Gupta V.K., Kumar B. and Singh B.P. (2016) Research in Microbiology, 167(8), 692-705.
41. Lin, L., & Xu, X. (2013) Current Microbiology, 67(2), 209-217.
42. Oliveira M.F., Silva M.G. and Van Der Sand S.T. (2010) Research in Microbiology, 161(7), 565-572.
43. Palaniyandi S.A., Yang S.H., Damodharan K. and Suh J.W. (2013) Journal of Basic Microbiology, 53(12), 985-995.
44. Xue L., Xue Q., Chen Q., Lin C., Shen G. and Zhao, J. (2013) Crop Protection, 43, 231-240.
45. Gtari M., Ghodhbane-Gtari F., Nouioui I., Beauchemin N. and Tisa L.S. (2012) Archives of Microbiology, 194(1), 3-11.
46. Glick B.R. (2012) Scientifica, 2012, 1-15.
47. Yaish M.W., Antony I. and Glick B.R. (2015) Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 107(6), 1519-1532.
48. Kaur T., Sharma D., Kaur A. and Manhas R.K. (2013) Archives Of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 46(14), 1756-1768
49. Shrivastava P., Kumar R. and Yandigeri M.S. (2017) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 24(1), 192-199.
50. Chen X., Pizzatti C., Bonaldi M., Saracchi M., Erlacher A., Kunova A., Berg G. and Cortesi P. (2016) Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 714.
51. Singh S.P. and Gaur R. (2017) Biological Control, 104, 44-56.
52. Ramette A., Frapolli M., Défago G. and Moënne-Loccoz Y. (2003) Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 16(6), 525-535.
53. Saini A., Aggarwal N.K., Sharma A. and Yadav A. (2015) Enzyme Research, 2015.
54. Hata E.M., Sijam K., Ahmad Z.A.M., Yusof M.T. and Azman N.A. (2015) Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 58(6), 821-832.
55. El-Tarabily K.A. (2008) Plant and Soil, 308(1-2), 161-174.
56. Kruasuwan W. and Thamchaipenet A. (2016) Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 35(4), 1074-1087.
57. Kruasuwan W., Hoskisson P.A. and Thamchaipenet A. (2017) Genome Announcements, 5(29), 1-2.
58. Dias M.P., Bastos M.S., Xavier V.B., Cassel E., Astarita L.V. and Santarém E.R. (2017) Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 118, 479-493.